中国少数股东强制挤出制度的不足与改进
Insufficiency and Improvement of the Squeeze-out System in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
少数股东强制挤出(Squeeze-out)制度是指,为了提高公司经营效率,在保证公正性交易的条件下,持有公司法定比率以上股份的控股股东通过合法程序违背少数股东的意愿将其挤出公司的制度。本制度虽然以提高经营效率、实现利益最大化为目的,但违背股东意愿强制剥脱其股东地位,则突破了传统公司法理念,因此各国在引入该制度时也颇有争论。尽管如此,随着金融和经济的规模化,为了便利公司组织调整及提高经营效率,该制度已经在全世界普遍存在。强制收购制度的具体内容和运作方式各国不尽相同,但是一般是以现金合并、要约收购方式,或者法律直接规定绝对持股股东的挤出权利为方式运作的。 中国目前尚无强制挤出少数股东的法律制度,而且与股东退出法律制度相关的法律仍不够健全,同时学术界关于该制度的理论研究也不够全面和深入。实际上,控股股东通过各种重组技术挤出少数股东,其挤出过程当中往往发生这些控股股东和少数股东之间的利益冲突及处理余股股东等难题,且其代价往往是远远高于原来对价。但是中国现行经济政策和各种改革措施乃是为了进一步推进上市公司并购重组市场化进程,促进上市公司深入推进行业整合和产业升级。通过强制挤出少数股东制度有利于上市公司增强竞争力、提升公司价值,有利于优化市场资源配置,这符合目前中国的政策方向。 本文主要关注本制度的效率性和利益调节功能,首先概述强制挤出制度的意义和价值,其次研究各国强制挤出机制的运作模式,最后,分析中国现行强制挤出规则的局限性,提出该制度的必要性和改进意见。
Abstract
Squeeze-out system means that, in order to improve operating efficiency, while ensuring fair trading conditions, the controlling shareholder holds the legal ratio or more through legal procedures against minority shareholders, and squeeze the company's system. For the purpose of improving operational efficiency and maximizing the profit, this system stripped of its majority shareholders and against shareholders ' will, consequently outweigh the traditional company laws. That is why so many countries had been disputed over the system while introducing it into their nations. Nevertheless, as the financial and economic scale, in order to facilitate organizational restructuring and enhancing operating efficiency of the company, this system has already been widespread throughout the world. Squeeze-out of specific contents and mode of operation of the system vary in nations, yet are generally presented in cash merger, takeover or laws to directly regulate the absolute shareholding rights. At present, there is no forced out of minority shareholders in the China's legal system, but actually it appeared in the way of cash-out merger similar to the practice in the United States to squeeze out minority shareholders 。 But relevant laws on the merger only makes several principle-related provisions, specific details and measures of protection are not sound, which led to the argument of lack of fairness of the deal itself and the rationality of the means. Although China in year 2013 revised the company law and the securities law and other legal norms in connection with corporate restructuring, but regulations related to the shareholders are not flawless, especially provision of passive withdrawal mechanism. Academic theory on this subject is not comprehensive nor has in-depth research either. In fact, the controlling shareholders take on a variety of restructuring process to squeeze out minority shareholders, usually results in the interests-conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders during the process; and various problems in the management, therefore reduce the company's operating efficiency.
참고문헌 (24)
- 施天涛, "公司法论(第二版)" (2006), 法律出版社
- 朱慈蕴, "公司法原论" (2011), 清华大学出版社
- 张善斌, "论强制取得少数股东股权——简易式兼并探析", 法学评论, 05 (2002)
- 孙婷婷, "排挤式公司合并对我国公司并购制度的启迪和借鉴", 法制与社会, 11 (2007)
- 王东光, "股东退出法律制度研究" (2010), 北京大学出版社
- 赵万一, "美国法上的排挤式公司合并及对我国的借鉴意义", 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 7 (2005)
- 朱慈蕴, "资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务", 法学研究, 04 (2004)
- 颜炳杰, "美国上市公司私有化相关法律问题", 北大法律评论, 01 (2008)
- 荣振华, "我国公司简易合并程序法律制度之探索", 法制与社会, 1 (2010)
- 李有星, "公司重组,理论与实践(21世纪商法论坛)" (2012), 社会科学文献出版社
- 刘凯湘, "股东代表诉讼的司法适用与立法完善——以"公司法"第152条的解释为中心", 中国法学, 04 (2008)
- 赵万一, "公司重组, 理论与实践(21世纪商法论坛)" (2012), 社会科学文献出版社
- 王怀劳, "要约收购下的股东权益保护", 管理世界, 2 (2007)
- 郑或, "上市公司收购法律制度研究,历史, 现状, 问题及变革", 证券法苑, 9 (2013)
- 王东光, "上市公司收购中收购方的强制排除权", 证券市场导报 (2009)
- 冯果, "公司重组, 理论与实践(21世纪商法论坛)" (2012), 社会科学文献出版社
- Julian Javier Garza, "Rethinking Corporate Governance : the Role of Minority Shareholders-Comparative Study", St. Mary. s Law Journal (2000)
- Franklin A. Gevurtz, "Squeeze-Outs and Freeze-outs in limited liability companies", Wash.U.L.Q, 73 (1995)
- Steven L, "Corporation: Emanuel Law outline" (2009), Wolter Kluwer
- Greene Edward F., "Corporate Freeze-out Mergers : A Proposed Analysis", Stanford Law Review, 28 (1976)
- Elliot J.Weiss, "The Law of Take Out Mergers : A Historical Perspective", New York Univ. L. Rev., 56 (1981)
- L.H.Leigh, "Introduction to Company Law, 4th ed" (1981), Butterworths
- Guhan Subramanian, "Fixing Freezeouts", Yale Law Journal, 115, pp.2~ (2005)
- Lucian A. Bebchuk, "Federal Corporate Law: Lessons from History", Columbia Law Review, 106 (2006)
