AHP를 이용한 정부출연연구소 평가 모형 연구
A Study on the Evaluation Model of Government-funded Research Institutes Using AHP
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.
참고문헌 (18)
- Harma, S., "Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis : An application of data envelopment analysis", Scientometrics, 76(3), pp.483~501 (2008)
- Jun, IJ, "Analyzing the research pic networks of technology management and developing a performance evaluation model of R&D commercialization", PhD, pp.2017
- Jung, GT., "A study on how to identify and prioritize appropriate performance indicators for basic science research", PhD, pp.2015
- Kaplan, RS, "Strategic learning and the balanced scorecard", Strategy and Leadership (1996)
- 김경수, "특허 마이닝을 이용한 국방과학기술 연결망 연구", 품질경영학회지, 49(1), pp.97~112 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 김영현, "국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(2), pp.183~197 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Kostoff, RN, "Strategic Management and Implementation of Textual Data Mining in Government Organizations", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(4), pp.493~525 (1999)
- 라영재, "정책평가의 이론기반평가: 평가원칙과 적용의 실제: 정부업무평가와 공공기관 경영평가 사례를 중심으로", 정책분석평가학회보, 30(3), pp.43~78 (2020), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
- 이문영, "피인용 특성 분석을 통한 출연(연) 임무중심형 기관평가의 질적 성과평가 개선 방향", 기술혁신학회지, 19(4), pp.768~798 (2016), 한국기술혁신학회
- Lim, GH, "Evaluation of R&D project in basic research support", Report of Business Evaluation, 16(7), pp.1~90 (2016)
- Park, S, "A case study on the university life of returning students", Journal of the Korean Association for Youth Research, 29(3), pp.5~40 (2018)
- A study on the development direction of the research institute based on autonomy and responsibility, "Park, SH", KISTEP, ~ (2017)
- Pouris, A, "Peer Review in Scientifically Small Countries", R&D Management, 18(4), pp.333~340 (1988)
- Powell ET, "Logic Models: A framework for program planning and evaluation", Nutrition Food Safety and Health Conference (2005)
- Ruegg, R., "A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment models, models, and findings from ATP’s first decade", National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration. US Department of Commerce, 3~857 (2003)
- Saaty, TL, "Decision making-the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes", Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13, pp.1~35 (2004)
- 손은일, "디지털 시대의 R&D 프로세스 변화 의미와 정책 방향", 품질경영학회지, 50(1), pp.35~42 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Werner, BM, "Measuring R&D performance – state of the art", Research-Technology Management, 40, pp.34~42 (1997)