인공지능과 법원의 분쟁해결-최근 영미법국가들의 인공지능 법제

키워드

참고문헌 (127)

1. 김용주, "인공지능(AI; Artificial Intelligence) 창작물에 대한 저작물로서의 보호가능성", 법학연구, 27(3), pp.267~297 (2016), 법학연구소
2. 김종호, "인공지능 로봇의 출현으로 인한 법적 논란에 관한 영역별 쟁점의 고찰", 법이론실무연구, 6(2), pp.225~263 (2018), 사단법인 한국법이론실무학회
3. 송영현, "인공지능 담론과 법의 사회적 현재성", 법학연구, 18(4), pp.429~461 (2018), 한국법학회
4. 오병철, "인공지능 로봇에 의한 손해의 불법행위책임", 인공지능과 법 세미나 (2017), 연세대
5. 윤혜선, "인공지능을 둘러싼 법의 관심과 그 지향점에 관한 일고(一考) – 미국의 인공지능과 법에 관한 논의 동을 중심으로", KISO저널, (23) (2016)
6. 정영화, "미국 연방대법원의 헌법해석의 진화와 쟁점", 홍익법학, 16(4), pp.87~119 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
7. 정영화, "미국의 자율주행 자동차의 안전성과 윤리 및 법적 책임", 미국헌법연구, 29(2), pp.199~244 (2018), 미국헌법학회
8. 조한상, "인공지능과 법, 그리고 논증", 법과정책연구, 16(2), pp.295~320 (2016), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
9. 사법정책연구원, "AI와 법 그리고 인간", 세미나 (2019)
10. 한국인공지능법학회, "인공지능과 데이터 3법", 세미나 (2020)
11. 인공지능 시대의 법적·윤리적 쟁점, "최은창", 과학기술정책연구원, ~, pp.｢미래포커스｣ 제28호 (2016)
12. "The Caging of America" (2012)[URL]
13. "Sent to Prison by a Software Program’s Secret Algorithms" (2017)[URL]
14. Ajay Agrawal, "Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb, Prediction Machines" (2018), Harvard Business Review Press
15. Alexandra Shookhoff, "The Unintended Sentence of Criminal Justice Debt", FED. SENT’G REP., 24(1), pp.62~63 (2011)
16. Nikolaos Aletras, "Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective", PeerJ Computer Science, 2, pp.e93~ (2016), PeerJ[DOI]
17. Andrea Roth, "Machine Testimony", Yale Law Journal, 126, pp.1972~ (2017)
18. "Machine bias" (2016)[URL]
19. Anupam Chander, "The Racist Algorithm?", Mich. L. Rev., 115 (2017)
20. Ashley K. D., "Artificial intelligence and legal analysis- new tools for the digital age" (2017), Cambridge University Press
21. Autor D H., "Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation", Journal of Economic Perspect, 29(3) (2015)
22. Preventing Crime Through Selective Incapacitation, "Ben Vollaard", Tilburg Law and Econ. Ctr, ~, pp.Discussion Paper No. 2011-001 (2010)
23. "ODR and the BC courts"[URL]
24. Birte Englich, "SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF PUNISHMENT OF CRIME" (2009)
25. Bureau of Justice Statistics Working Paper Series, Federal Sentencing Disparity: 2005–2012, , ~ (2015)
26. "Smart courts ease access to legal services" (2020)[URL]
27. Carniero D., "Online dispute resolution: An artificial intelligence perspective", Artificial Intellectual Review, 41(2) (2014)
28. Cathy O’Neil, "Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy" (2016)
29. Chin D, "Sentencing: A Role for Empathy", Univ Penn Law Rev, 160(6) (2012)
30. Christopher Slobogin, "Risk Assessment", pp.203~205 (2012)
31. "Y combinator startup uses big data to invest in civil lawsuits" (2016)[URL]
32. "How the CRT works"[URL]
33. Collby TB, "In defense of Judicial Empathy", Minn Law Rev, 96 (2012)
34. C M Chu, "The Short- to Medium-term Predictive Accuracy of Static and Dynamic Risk Assessment Measures in a Secure Forensic Hospital", ASSESSMENT, 20 (2013)
35. Cao Yin, "Smart courts ease access to legal services", China Daily, ~ (2020)
36. David Abrams, "Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?", J. LEGAL STUD.,, 41 (2012)
37. Dag Wiese Schartum, "Law and Algorithms in the Public Domain", NORDIC J. APPLIED ETHICS, 10(1), pp.15~ (2016)
38. Danielle Keats Citron, "Technological Due Process", Wash. Univ. L. Rev., 85, pp.1249~ (2008)
39. David Abrams, "Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?", J. LEGAL STUD., 41, pp.347~ (2012)
40. "Do no harm, don’t discriminate: official guidance issued on robot ethics" (2016)[URL]
41. Don Weatherburn, "How Much Crime Does Prison Stop? The Incapacitation Effect of Prison on Burglary", N.S.W. CRIME & JUST. BULL (2006)
42. Edward Latessa, "The Role of Offender Risk Assessment: A Policy Maker Guide", VICTIMS & OFFENDERS, 5 (2010)
43. Eisenberg MA, "Participation, Responsiveness, and the Consultation Process: An Essay for Lon Fuller", Harv Law Rev, 92 (1978)
44. "Algorithmic Due Process: Mistaken Accountability and Attribution in State v.Loomis" (2017)[URL]
45. "National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 57th Annual Meeting and 13th State Criminal Justice Network Conference" (2014)[URL]
46. Fuller Lon L, "The Forms and Limits of Adjudication", Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978)
47. "Online dispute resolution, The Internet Encyclopaedia"[URL]
48. Geoffrey De Q. Walker, "The Rule of Law" (1988)
49. Harvey D., "From Susskin to Briggs: Online Court Approaches", Journal Civil Litigation Practice, 5(2) (2016)
50. "Prison and courts bill scrapped" (2017)[URL]
51. "United States of America"[URL]
52. J Finis, "Natural Law and Natural Rights" (1980)
53. J L Jowell, "The Changing Constitution" (1985)
54. J. Raz, "The Authority of Law" (1979)
56. "Courts Are Using AI to Sentence Criminals. That Must Stop Now" (2017)[URL]
58. Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, "Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?", NOTRE DAME L. REV., 84 (2009)
59. John Lightbourne, "Damned Lies & Criminal Sentencing Using Evidence-Based Tools", Duke L. & Tech. Rev., 15 (2017)
60. Joshua M. Divine, "Booker Disparity and Data-Driven Sentencing" (2016)
61. Judge James S. Gwin, "Juror Sentiment on Just Punishment: Do the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reflect Community Values?", HARV. L. & POL’Y REV., 4 (2010)
62. "Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it’s Biased Against Blacks" (2016)[URL]
66. "Code-Dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age" (2017)[URL]
67. Levin S., "A beauty contest was judged by AI and the robots didn’tlike dark skin", The Guardian, ~ (2016)
68. Lind EA, "The social Psychology of procedural Justice" (1988), Plenum Press
69. Liptak A., "Sent to person by a software program’s secret algorithms", New york Times, ~ (2017)
70. Lopez I., "The early years begin for AI’s transformation of law", Legaltech News, ~ (2016)
71. M Davis, "PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW: BRIDGING THE GAP" (2008)
72. "There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it’s Biased Against Blacks" (2016)[URL]
73. "Big Data May be Reinforcing Racial Bias In the Criminal Justice System" (2017)[URL]
74. Maria Jean J. Hall, "Supporting Discretionary Decision-Making with Information Technology: A Case Study in the Criminal Sentencing Jurisdiction", UOLTJ, 2(1) (2005)
76. Melissa Hamilton, "Back to the Future: The Influence of Criminal History on Risk Assessments", BERKELEY J. CRIM. L., 20 (2015)
77. "Ten Economic Facts about Crime and Incarceration in the United States" (2014)[URL]
78. Michael Tonry, "Legal and Ethical Issues in the Prediction of Recidivism", FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER, 26(3) (2014)
79. Michael Tonry, "PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS AT SENTENCING" (2010)
80. Michael Cross, "Judges go online to explain their modern mission", Law Society Gazette (2019)
81. Michael Tonry, "Legal and Ethical Issues in the Prediction of Recidivism", FED. SENT’G REP., 26 (2014)
82. Michele Benedetto Neitz, "Socioeconomic Bias in the Judiciary", CLEV. ST. L. REV., 61 (2013)
83. "Artificial intelligence in law: the state of play 2016 (part 1)" (2016)[URL]
84. "Ministry of Justice of the Gov’t of UK and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service, Transforming our Justice System" (2016)[URL]
85. Mirko Bagaric, "Sentencing by Computer: Enhancing Sentencing Transparency and Predictability, and (Possibly) Bridging The Gap Between Sentencing Knowledge and Practice", George Mason Law Review, 25(4), pp.4~ (2018)
86. Mirko Bagaric, "Bringing Sentencing into the 21st Century: Closing the Gap Between Practice and Knowledge by Introducing Expertise into Sentencing Law", HOFSTRA L. REV., 45(3) (2017)
87. Mirko Bagaric, "Sentencing: From Vagueness To Arbitrariness: The Need to Abolish the Stain that is the Instinctive Synthesis", U.N.S.W. L. J., 38 (2015)
88. Mirko Bagaric, "Three Things That a Baseline Study Shows Do Not Cause Indigenous Over-Imprisonment", HARV. J. ON RACIAL & ETHNIC JUST., 32 (2016)
89. Mirko Bagaric, "Three Things That Might (But Shouldn’t) and Three Reforms that Will Reduce Indigenous Over-Imprisonment", HARV. J. ON RACIAL & ETHNIC JUST., 32 (2016)
90. "MyLawBC, Separation, Divorce & Family Matters"[URL]
91. Nancy Gertner, "A Short History of American Sentencing: Too Little Law, Too Much Law, or Just Right", J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY, 100 (2010)
92. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, "THE GROWTH OF INCARCERATION IN THE UNITED STATES, EXPLORING CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES" (2014)
93. Neil Hutton, "Sentencing, Rationality, and Computer Technology", J. Law & Society, 22(4) (1995)
95. "Baum der Erkenntnis nicht nur im Paradies verboten" (2019)[URL]
96. Nikolaos Aletras, "Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective", PeerJ Computer Science, 2, pp.e93~ (2016), PeerJ[DOI]
97. Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service, "Small Claims", ~ (2011)
98. Northpointe, "A Practitioner's Guide to COMPAS Core", ~ (2015)
99. "OECD Skills Outlook 2019"[URL]
100. Pari McGarraugh, "Up or Out: Why “Sufficiently Reliable” Statistical Risk Assessment Is Appropriate at Sentencing and Inappropriate at Parole", MINN. L. REV., 97 (2013)
101. Perry M., "iDecide: Administrative Decision-making in the Digital World", Austria Law Journal, 91 (2017)
102. Picard R, "Affective Computing" (1997), MIT Media Lab
104. Ric Simmons, "Quantifying Criminal Procedure: How To Unlock The Potential of Big Data in Our Criminal Justice System", MICH. ST. L. REV. (2016)
105. Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art 31, "Richard Berk", U. Pa. Dep’t. of Criminology, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 2017-10 (2017)
106. Richard Susskind, "Transforming Law: Essays On Technology, Justice and The Legal Marketplace" (2000)
107. Ronald Everett, "Difference, Disparity, and Race", Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing, 2002, pp.18, ~
108. Rose Matsui Ochi, "Racial Discrimination in Criminal Sentencing", JUDGES, 24 (1985)
110. "Y combinator startup uses big data to invest in civil lawsuits" (2016)[URL]
111. Shawn Bushway, "Sentencing Using Statistical Treatment Rules: What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Us", J. QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 23 (2007)
112. Siegfried L. Sporer, "SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF PUNISHMENT OF CRIME" (2009), John Wiley & Sons
113. Silver D., "Mastering the game of Go with deep neutral networks and tree search", Nature, 529 (2016)
114. Sinai Y, "Expanding Judicial Discretion: Between Legal and conflict Considerations", Harv. Negotiation Law Rev, 21 (2016)
115. Sonja B. Starr, "Evidence–Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination", Stan. L. Rev., 66 (2014)
116. Sourdin T., "The role of the courts in the new justice system", Yearbook Arbitration and Mediation, 7 (2016)
117. State v. Loomis, "Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Warning Before Use of Algorithmic Risk Assessments in Sentencing", Harv. L. Rev., 130 (2017)
118. Stefan Voigt, "Determinants of Judicial Efficiency: A Survey", EUR. J. L. ECON., 42 (2016)
119. Surden H., "Machine learning and law", Washington Law Review, 89 (2014)
121. Tania Sourdin, "The Responsive Judge- International Perspectives" (2018), Springer
123. Thibaut J., "Procedural Justice: A psychological Analysis" (1975), Erlbaum
125. "United States v. Taveras, 585 F. Supp. 2d 327 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)", ~ (2008)
126. Van den Bos K, "On the role of perceived procedural Justice in citizens’ Reactions to Government decisions and the handling of conflicts", Utrecht Law Review, 10(4) (2014)
127. Wilson T., "Explaining Away: a model of attractive adaptation", Perspect Psychology Science, 3(5) (2017)

관련 논문AI추천