17세기 복제예송이 18세기 복제 예론에 미친 영향 - 예론의 지역적 분립과 학파 내의 분화를 중심으로

Abstract

This paper describes and analyzes how the controversy about the Confucian funerary rituals in the 17th century had influences on the debate of the Confucian funerary rituals in the 18th century. In the 17th century, there were issued three types of rituals theory: the mode of one-year mourning by Song siyeol, the mode of three-year mourning by Heo mok, and the mode of three-year untrimmed mourning by Yun hyoo. In the 18th century Chosun dynasty, there were four cases of the Confucian funerary rituals: first, the funerary rituals of Tanuybin whose husband was king Kyongjong, second, that of king Kyongjong, third, that of prince Hyojang, and last, that of princess Hyosoonhyunbin wife of prince Hyojang. In each case, the debate of the funerary rituals was performed by Confucian scholars of ritual ceremony. Confucian scholars had confrontation with each other within their own party, or with opposite party, or with their king. Some points are observed in the analysing of the debates in the 18th century. First, the rituals theories of Song siyeol and Heo mok were still very powerful in each party. Second, the rituals theories of the Old party were bifurcating between Han Wonjin and Yoon Bongkoo. Han gave emphasis to succession of generations and distintion according to social status, but Yoon gave emphasis to original association by kinship. Third, the Southern party corrected and developed their own theories inherited from Heo mok. Forth, Yun hyoo's theory was not cited by the two party.