조선후기 기해예송의 ‘사종설’에 드러난 참의미 - 송시열 ‧ 윤휴 ‧ 정약용의 입장에서 비교 연구 -

Abstract

King Hyeonjong, who ascended the throne after the middle of the Joseon Dynasty, was caught up in the first and the second Yesong (禮訟) arguments during his reigning period of 15 years. As for the manifestation of the argument, the controversy over how long King Hyojong’s stepmother, Jodaebi, should wear a mourning dress when King Hyojong died, that is, whether she must wear it for one year or wear Chamchoi (斬衰) for three years, was the first Gihae Yesong (己亥禮訟). And the controversy over how long Jodaebi who was still alive should wear a mourning dress when King Hyojong’s queen, Queen Inseon, died in the year of Gapin (甲寅, 1674) was the second Yesong argument. In this paper, the Yesong argument between Seoin (西人) and Namin (南人) was examined, which began with Song Si-yeol’s contention of Gineyonbok (朞年服) based on Gagongeon’s Sajongseol (四種說) in consideration of Hyojong’s being a second son in Gihae Yesong. In this study, first, the reasons why Song Si-yeol had chosen the theory of Ginyeon (朞年) were investigated focusing on Sajongseol. Second, the intensity of the political conflicts between Seoin and Namin revealed through Yesong was checked as the grounds on which Yun Hyu insisted on Chamchoi, a three-year-mourning dress, were verified. Third, Dasan Jeong Yak-yong agreed to and criticized the clothing systems of Song Si-yeol and Yun Hyu in Jeongchejeonjungbyeon (正體傳重辨), but had a neutral position regarding Seoin and Namin. In this paper, the meanings of ‘Sajongseol’ were reexamined through the three persons’ opinions of a clothing system.