갈암과 우담의 율곡 인심도심설 비판과 퇴계 인심도심설의 재해석

Abstract

This paper is preparation for review of Galam(Lee, hyunil) and Woodam(Jeong, sihwan) of the two men insimdosimsul characteristics, same Toigye school members these people to theories make sure there are theoretical differences, through these differences consider Toigye this after Toigye school sunglisul of systematic development aspect to a variety of. In conclusion, These are two parent criticize Yulgok and admit Toigye hobalsul, but even between them can check that there was a difference on academic. Galam to explain the feasibility of Toigye hobalsul, more emphasis on the bunbulsul logic, as bunbulsul logic sees division will be developed insim and dosim. because insim and dosim originally ‘not one source’ the expression but not too much. on the other side, Woodam movie as one the harmony between heaven and earth, insim and dosim formerly the fact that the source of one, and they decided to go on it, as juli and juki of logic divide insim and dosim. because insim and dosim speak by relative ‘source is not one’ you must never talk. In other words, Galam as bunbulsul logic Toigye enhance insim and dosim, Woodam could be seen as deadlock in the centralized point of view of Yulgok. Galam and Woodam insimdosimsul trait theory understand in a variety of one side of the developments of in the 17th century Toigye school sunglisul.