율곡 이이와 남당 한원진 인심도심설의 대비적 고찰

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the theoretical differences by way of preparedness Yulgok Leeyi(1536-1584) and Namdang Hanwŏnjin(1682-1751) of Inshimdoshim. In conclusion, Yulgok and Namdang both interpreted based on Kibarisŭngilto, but there were some theoretical differences between the two people. More specifically, their Kibarisŭngilto was illogical compared to Zhuza's Hogwŏnhoksaeng that interpreted difference between Insim and Dosim in Chungyongjanggu『中庸章句』 preface. About Zhuza's Hogwŏnhoksaeng, T'oegye interpreted difference between Dosim which was based on Sŏngmyŏng(li) and Insim which was based on Hyŏnggi(gi), while Yulgok interpreted Dosim which was based on morality and loyalty(道義) and Insim which was based on appetite and prurience(食色) divided in two ways based on Kibarisŭngilto, and finally, as a theoretical basis, he attracted Juli and Juki perspective. Of course, this interpretation resulted in the combination of two aspects of Wonil and Ryui both sides. However Namdang was divided into Insim/Jugi and Dosim/Juli, in this case, he criticized that Insim was defined as evil unlike Dosim. Namdang claimed that Insim cannot completely be defined as evil, in this light, he interpreted Inshimdoshim which was made up of three structures of Dosim(Sunsŏnmuak 純善無惡), Insim(Yusŏn 有善) and Insim(Yuak 有惡). This is characteristic of Namdang’s Inshimdoshim, which distinguishes Yulgok.