갈암葛庵 이현일李玄逸과 우담愚潭 정시한丁時翰의 사단칠정론 비교고찰

Abstract

In this paper made clear the theoretical differences by comparing the sadanchiljeonglon of the Galam and Wodam. Galam and Woodam are contemporary figures, and they are almost identical to birth and death, their representative writings, “Yulgokllisilonsadanchiljeongshebyun” and “sachilbyunzeung”, starting with the rejection of Yulgok’s theory, Toegye’s theory is consistently supported. But even though Galam and Woodam were members of Toegye school, they succeeded Toegye’s theory in theory. Nevertheless, clear theoretical differences can be identified between the two. Like Toegye, Galam emphasizes the logic of discretion and recognizes the fundamental differences sadanchiljeong, interpret the two separately by dividing Libal and Kibal. Woodam, on the other hand, on the premise of one mind that combines the view of the Honlun and Bunbyul, on top of that are interpreted by dividing Libal and Kibal. In other words, Galam reinforced the logic of discrimination and interpreted Toegye’s theory, on the other side Woodam can be reinterpreting Toegye’s theory as compromising Yulgok’s theory.