17세기 율곡학파의 '대학' 해석 연구 ― 대전본 소주 분석을 중심으로

Abstract

This thesis is written in order to consider the school of Yulgok(栗谷)'s level of understanding, its peculiarity, and academic meaning in the Confucian classics in the 17th century. The 17th century was an important turning point on the study of the Confucian classics in Korea. Compared to the previous study, there were various changes and progress in the17th century, based on the completion of Korean annotation of Chinese classics in the 16th century, the establishment of the criteria in interpretation, and the intellectuals' self-consciousness through two wars.(Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592 and Ching's Invasion of Korea in 1636)Among the scholars, starting from Yulgok(栗谷) YiYi(李珥), the school of Yulgok which includes Kim Jangseng(金長生), Song Shiyul(宋時烈), Yi Yutae(李惟泰) and so on was attracted most by Saseodaejun(四書大全) the detailed interpretation of the Confucian classics. anno-tation Saseodaejun(四書大全) was a Ming's advanced culture, however, there were too many misinterpretations. There were many problems; According to the scholar Go Yummu(顧炎武), a small annotation of Saseodaejun(四書大全)'s interpretations do not correspond with Zhu xi's commentary and a mixed explanation of a specific person makes it more difficult to find out his real intention. It was Yulgok(栗谷) who started an academic examination over these a small annotation of Saseodaejun(四書大全)'s problems in Josun Dynasty. Yulgok(栗谷) YiYi(李珥) started to scrutinize a small annotation of Saseodaejun(四書大全) by the order to King of Sunjo(宣祖) and this work had achieved the result through Kim Jangsen(金長生), Yi Yutae(李惟泰) and Song Shiyul(宋時烈). Song Shiyul(宋時烈)'s immediate pupil, Kim Changhyup(金昌協) criticize a small annotation of Saseodaejun(四書大全) by 7points in his Nonoesuk(論語說) and Han Wonjin(韓元震), the pupil of transmission in 18th century, expanded this criticism into the Four Books of Ancient China. These aspects are the typical way the school of Yulgok(栗谷) translated the Confucian classics.