16~17세기 퇴계학파退溪學派의 사서四書 해석과 그 의미 ― 금보琴輔·이덕홍李德弘·조호익曺好益의 사서 해석을 중심으로

Abstract

This thesis was intended to analyze Saseogilyue(四書質疑) by Kum bo(琴輔), Saseogilyue(四書質疑) by Lee dughong(李德弘), Geoseogilyue(諸 書質疑) and Daehakdongjamundab(大學童子問答) by Jo hoic(曺好益) among Toegye school's interpretations on Chinese classics from 16th to 17th century. In addition to it, it was also intended to study on the characteristics and meaning of the interpretations of Chinese classics. Kum bo(琴輔)'s Saseogilyue(四書質疑) was written when he lived in after his mentor, Lee hwang(李滉) resigned his post in an office. Therefore, it was concluded that the book profoundly influenced Lee hwang's Saseosukyue(四書釋義). To support this, it was made clear that more than half of Saseogilyue(四書質疑) the Analects of Confucius(四書質疑 論語) was integrated into Nonoesukyue(論語釋義). Lee dughong(李德弘)'s Saseogilyue(四書質疑) was mistaken for Toegye's writing by Giho school scholars. As a result, much of Saseogilyue(四書質疑)'s original text was deleted. Nonetheless, Saseogilyue(四書質疑) is succeeded to Lee hwang(李滉)'s Saseosukyue(四書釋義). Therefore, it is a very important material for the study on the interpretation of Chinese classics by the disciples right before the Toegye school ties. Besides, it was found significant in that Jo hoic's interpretations of Chinese classics showed the variety of Toegye school. Furthermore, Geoseogilyue(諸書質疑) is the subject of Saseodaejun(四書大全) analysis. Lastly, much effort was put to exceed the limits of 小註 by the way of both Sunglidaejun(性理大全) and Saseojangdo(四書章圖). The interpretation of Chinese classics of 16th and 17th century by Toegye school has a key importance in that it was achieved very creatively. In other words, contemporary scholars at that time was deeply biased in the way they followed only Zhuxi's theory, however, these scholars took a different way from them.