본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

헬스케어 AI 윤리에서 환자·시민 참여 모형: 주제범위 고찰과 방법론적 검토에 기초하여

Patient and Public Involvement Model in Healthcare AI Ethics: Based on Scoping Review and Methodological Reflections

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.

Abstract

To apply healthcare AI ethics in clinical and research settings, self-regulatory frameworks emphasize the necessity of external validation. Building on theoretical discussions that justify patients and the public as key actors in this validation process, this article conducts a scoping review on patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare AI and proposes a model for their engagement. A search was conducted in academic databases using the keywords “AI” and “patient and public involvement.” Out of the 114 studies that were identified, 16 were selected for review; the selected studies consisted of four scoping reviews, eight empirical studies, and four theoretical papers. The review confirmed ongoing discussions on PPI in healthcare AI, but highlighted the lack of detailed implementation strategies. This article suggests participatory design, healthcare AI literacy, and citizen science models as potential approaches for engagement, discussing their possibilities and limitations.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Topol EJ, "Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again" (2019), Basic Books
  2. "Former OpenAI board member explains why they fired Sam Altman" (2024)[URL]
  3. "He tried to oust OpenAI’s CEO. Now, he’s starting a ‘safe’ rival" (2024)[URL]
  4. "OpenAI CEO says company could become for-profit corporation, The Information reports" (2024)[URL]
  5. Asan O, "Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare : focus on clinicians", J Med Internet Res, 22(6), pp.e15154~ (2020)[DOI]
  6. World Health Organization(WHO), "Basic documents" (2020), WHO
  7. "Real-world evidence" (2024)[URL]
  8. Bhatt A, "Ethical considerations for real-world evidence studies", Perspect Clin Res, 15(3), pp.152~154 (2024)[DOI]
  9. Lee S, "Issues under applicable law"Guidelines for the Use of Health data"", Korean Med Law Soc, 22(4), pp.3~35 (2021)[DOI]
  10. Beauchamp TL, "Principles of biomedical ethics" (2019), Oxford University Press
  11. Delpierre C, "Precision and personalized medicine : what their current definition says and silences about the model of health they promote. Implication for the development of personalized health", Front Sociol, 8, pp.1112159~ (2023)[DOI]
  12. Cha H, "Ethical issues concerning health data ownership", Korean J Med Ethics, 24(4), pp.423~459 (2021)[DOI]
  13. Lintner T, "A systematic review of AI literacy scales", njp Sci Learn, 9(1), pp.50~ (2024)[DOI]
  14. Kohlmayer F, "Pseudonymization for research data collection : is the juice worth the squeeze?", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 19(1), pp.178~ (2019)[DOI]
  15. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, "World Health Organization(WHO)", WHO, ~ (2019)
  16. Kim H, "Ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence research in healthcare : introducing South Korean perspectives", Korean J Med Law, 31(1), pp.85~110 (2023)[DOI]
  17. Kim J, "Developing a framework for self-regulatory governance in healthcare AI research : insights from South Korea", Asian Bioeth Rev, 16(3), pp.391~406 (2024)[DOI]
  18. Fricker M, "Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing" (2007), Oxford University Press
  19. Research ethics guidelines for AI researchers in healthcare, "Korean National Institute of Health", Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, ~ (2023)
  20. Modigh A, "The impact of patient and public involvement in health research versus healthcare : a scoping review of reviews", Health Policy, 125(9), pp.1208~1221 (2021)[DOI]
  21. Dengsø KE, "Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research : a scoping review of contemporary practice", Res Involv Engagem, 9(1), pp.72~ (2023)[DOI]
  22. Cluley V, "Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation : a scoping review", Health Expect, 25(3), pp.840~855 (2022)[DOI]
  23. Zidaru T, "Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care : a systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice", Health Expect, 24(4), pp.1072~1124 (2021)[DOI]
  24. Kelly BS, "The ethical matrix as a method for involving people living with disease and the wider public(PPI)in near-term artificial intelligence research", Radiography, 29(suppl 1), pp.S103~S111 (2023)[DOI]
  25. Hui CY, "Patient and public involvement workshop to shape artificial intelligence-supported connected asthma self-management research", PLOS Digit Health, 3(5), pp.e0000521~ (2024)[DOI]
  26. Hughes NF, "Patient and public involvement to inform priorities and practice for research using existing healthcare data for children’s and young people’s cancers", Res Involv Engagem, 9(1), pp.71~ (2023)[DOI]
  27. Kuo RYL, "Stakeholder perspectives towards diagnostic artificial intelligence : co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis", eClinicalMedicine, 71, pp.102555~ (2024)[DOI]
  28. Lammons W, "Centering public perceptions on translating AI into clinical practice : patient and public involvement and engagement consultation focus group study", J Med Internet Res, 25, pp.e49303~ (2023)[DOI]
  29. Katirai A, "Perspectives on artificial intelligence in healthcare from a Patient and Public Involvement Panel in Japan : an exploratory study", Front Digit Health, 5, pp.1229308~ (2023)[DOI]
  30. Stogiannos N, "AI implementation in the UK landscape : knowledge of AI governance, perceived challenges and opportunities, and ways forward for radiographers", Radiography, 30(2), pp.612~621 (2024)[DOI]
  31. Newton L, "Assessing early feasibility of a novel innovation to increase consumer partnership capability within an Australian health innovation organisation using a mixed-method approach", BMJ Open, 14(5), pp.e080495~ (2024)[DOI]
  32. McKay F, "Public governance of medical artificial intelligence research in the UK : an integrated multi-scale model", Res Involv Engagem, 8(1), pp.21~ (2022)[DOI]
  33. Banerjee S, "Patient and public involvement to build trust in artificial intelligence : a framework, tools, and case studies", Patterns, 3(6), pp.100506~ (2022)[DOI]
  34. Rogers WA, "Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications : detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues", Bioethics, 35(7), pp.623~633 (2021)[DOI]
  35. Donia J, "Co-design and ethical artificial intelligence for health : an agenda for critical research and practice", Big Data Soc, 8(2), pp.1~12 (2021)[DOI]
  36. Rifkin SB, "Alma Ata after 40 years : primary health care and health for all : from consensus to complexity", BMJ Glob Health, 3(suppl 3), pp.e001188~ (2018)[DOI]
  37. Ocloo J, "From tokenism to empowerment : progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement", BMJ Qual Saf, 25(8), pp.626~632 (2016)[DOI]
  38. Cha MK, "‘Get undone science done’ and challenges to expertism in research : the case of Korean Type 1 Diabetes Association", J Sci Technol Stud, 23(1), pp.1~39 (2023)[DOI]
  39. Long D, "What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations", CHI ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), Association for Computing Machinery
  40. Ghassemi M, "The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care", Lancet Digit Health, 3(11), pp.E745~E750 (2021)[DOI]
  41. Cavalier D, "The field guide to citizen science: how you can contribute to scientific research and make a difference" (2020), Timber Press
  42. Park J, "The current state and tasks of citizen science in Korea", J Sci Technol Stud, 18(2), pp.7~41 (2018)[DOI]
  43. Ceccaroni L, "Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence", Citizen Sci, 4(1), pp.29~ (2019)[DOI]
  44. Kim J, "A request for active patient : in relation to"Living with COVID-19"", Humanit Res, 53, pp.37~77 (2022)[DOI]
  45. "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service"[URL]
  46. Hernandez RG, "The COVID-19 vaccine social media infodemic : Healthcare providers’ missed dose in addressing misinformation and vaccine hesitancy", Hum Vaccin Immunother, 17(9), pp.2962~2964 (2021)[DOI]
  47. Rhodes N, "Mapping buyer’s clubs; what role do they play in achieving equitable access to medicines?", Glob Public Health, 17(9), pp.1842~1853 (2022)[DOI]
  48. Wynne B, "Public participation in science and technology : performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake", East Asian Sci Technol Soc Int J, 1(1), pp.99~110 (2007)[DOI]
  49. Larson H, "Stuck : how vaccine rumors start and why they don’t go away" (2022), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)