보건의료 AI 개발에서 환자 시민 참여 모델 적용을 위한 제언
Considerations for Implementing a Patient and Public Engagement Model of Healthcare AI
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This commentary builds on the lead article for this volume by proposing additional considerations for implementing a healthcare AI framework centered on patients and citizens. It argues that rather than being mere data providers, patients and citizens must serve as external validators, thereby enhancing transparency and fairness in the development of healthcare AI. The participation of patients and citizens is essential to safeguarding the rights of data providers, ensuring transparent AI usage, and promoting equitable healthcare access. However, current domestic systems, including broad consent mechanisms, limit meaningful involvement. This commentary addresses these limitations by highlighting the need for centralized, provider-focused data governance, clear information dissemination, and ongoing education initiatives. Ultimately, while the participation of patients and citizens is crucial for fostering trust in healthcare AI, that participation must be supported with systematic strategies and long-term investments.
Abstract
This commentary builds on the lead article for this volume by proposing additional considerations for implementing a healthcare AI framework centered on patients and citizens. It argues that rather than being mere data providers, patients and citizens must serve as external validators, thereby enhancing transparency and fairness in the development of healthcare AI. The participation of patients and citizens is essential to safeguarding the rights of data providers, ensuring transparent AI usage, and promoting equitable healthcare access. However, current domestic systems, including broad consent mechanisms, limit meaningful involvement. This commentary addresses these limitations by highlighting the need for centralized, provider-focused data governance, clear information dissemination, and ongoing education initiatives. Ultimately, while the participation of patients and citizens is crucial for fostering trust in healthcare AI, that participation must be supported with systematic strategies and long-term investments.
참고문헌 (20)
- Price WN 2nd, "Privacy in the age of medical big data", Nat Med, 25(1), pp.37~43 (2019)[DOI]
- Sieber R, "Who are the publics engaging in AI?", Public Underst Sci, 33(5), pp.634~653 (2024)[DOI]
- OECD, "Focus on citizens: public engagement for better policy and services" (2009), OECD Studies on Public Engagement
- Cameron H, "Ethical considerations in health data sharing: balancing privacy, confidentiality and data utility", J Health Med Inform, 15(2), pp.520~ (2024)[DOI]
- Loftus TJ, "Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series", Surgery, 171(5), pp.1435~1439 (2022)[DOI]
- Cowls J, "The 2019 yearbook of the digital ethics lab" (2019), Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook
- Kwangsu M, "The ethical use of biomedical big data : shifting from a consent model to an agreement model", Korean J Med Ethics, 22(1), pp.1~19 (2019)[DOI]
- Cho SJ, "The overview of the public opinion survey and emerging ethical challenges in the healthcare big data Research", J KAIRB, 4(1), pp.16~22 (2022)
- Kaufman DJ, "A survey of U. S adults’ opinions about conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative cohort study of genes and environment", PLOS ONE, 11(8), pp.e0160461~ (2016)[DOI]
- Yang JH, "Public perceptions and attitudes of the national project of bio-big data : a nationwide survey in the Republic of Korea", Front Genet, 14, pp.1081812~ (2023)[DOI]
- Pearce A, "Publics’ knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics : a scoping review", Eur J Hum Genet, 32(7), pp.747~758 (2024)[DOI]
- Waisbren SE, "Parents are interested in newborn genomic testing during the early postpartum period", Genet Med, 17(6), pp.501~504 (2015)[DOI]
- van der Pal SM, "Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening", PLOS ONE, 17(8), pp.e0272585~ (2022)[DOI]
- Michelson KN, "Navigating clinical and business ethics while sharing patient data", JAMA, 327(11), pp.1025~1026 (2022)[DOI]
- "Dinerstein v. Google, LLC. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 20-3134", ~ (2023)
- "Managing the transition to a multi-stakeholder artificial intelligence governance" (2020)[URL]
- "Improving public health through artificial intelligence-based medical technology innovation" (2024)[URL]
- "Advisory report: big data and artificial intelligence in human biomedical research" (2024)[URL]
- "Ethical guidelines for application of artificial intelligence in Biomedical Research and Healthcare 2023" (2024)[URL]
- "Bill 64, an act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information" (2024)[URL]