การกลายเป็นคำไวยากรณ์ของคำว่า 가다 /gada/ ในภาษาเกาหลี เปรียบเทียบกับคำว่าไป ในภาษาไทย
Grammaticalization of /gada/ in Korean in comparison to /paj/ in Thai.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Grammaticalization is the process whereby lexical or content words acquire grammatical function or existing grammatical units acquire further grammatical functions. Grammaticalization has received a great deal of attention within cognitive linguistics, because it is characterized by interwoven changes in the form and meaning of a given construction and can therefore be seen as a process that is essentially grounded in meaning. Polysemy of /gada/ in Korean and /paj/ in Thai have both similarities and differences and main reason of the similarities come from the fact that the two words have the same prototypical meaning. Then the meaning extended from the movement of animate to non-animate agents, from the movement of concrete to abstract trajectors, from objective motion to subjective motion, and lastly from spatial meaning to temporal/aspectual meaning by grammaticalization process. Both words have aspectual meaning of continuation (imperfective aspect), while /paj/ in thai have the meaning of perfective aspect which /gada/ in Korean does not have. There still is a controversy on the issue of grammaticalization especially in Thai academia, but I suggest that phenomenon of content word such as /gada/ in Korean and /paj/ in Thai acquiring additional function as auxiliary verbs with aspectual meaning should be considered as a kind of grammaticalization. Though we cannot bring to a conclusion that how far the words are grammaticalized at the moment, but it is still very interesting and valuable to study the grammaticalization which might let us predict the trend of language change.
Abstract
Grammaticalization is the process whereby lexical or content words acquire grammatical function or existing grammatical units acquire further grammatical functions. Grammaticalization has received a great deal of attention within cognitive linguistics, because it is characterized by interwoven changes in the form and meaning of a given construction and can therefore be seen as a process that is essentially grounded in meaning. Polysemy of /gada/ in Korean and /paj/ in Thai have both similarities and differences and main reason of the similarities come from the fact that the two words have the same prototypical meaning. Then the meaning extended from the movement of animate to non-animate agents, from the movement of concrete to abstract trajectors, from objective motion to subjective motion, and lastly from spatial meaning to temporal/aspectual meaning by grammaticalization process. Both words have aspectual meaning of continuation (imperfective aspect), while /paj/ in thai have the meaning of perfective aspect which /gada/ in Korean does not have. There still is a controversy on the issue of grammaticalization especially in Thai academia, but I suggest that phenomenon of content word such as /gada/ in Korean and /paj/ in Thai acquiring additional function as auxiliary verbs with aspectual meaning should be considered as a kind of grammaticalization. Though we cannot bring to a conclusion that how far the words are grammaticalized at the moment, but it is still very interesting and valuable to study the grammaticalization which might let us predict the trend of language change.
참고문헌 (31)
- Chae, Hee Rahk., "A definition and classification of locomotion verbs. (이동 동사의 정의와 분류)", Studies in Modern Grammar, 15, pp.1~22 (1999)
- Evans, Vyvyan., "A glossary of cognitive linguistics" (2007), Edinburgh University Press
- Evans, Vyvyan, "Cognitive linguistics: An introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Gao, Yuan, "Ten lectures on cognitive linguistics by George lakoff" (2007), Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
- 정주리, "'가다' 동사의 의미와 구문에 대한 구문문법적 접근", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.267~294 (2005), 한국어의미학회
- Jin, Ryeo Bong., "A study on meaning of Korean verbs ‘gada’ and ‘oda’. (한국어 동사 ‘가다’와 ‘오다’의 의미에 대한 연구)", 석사, pp.2008
- Johnson, Mark, "The body in the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Jung, Hwan Seung., "Theory of modern Thai grammar. (현대태국어문법론)" (2002), Samji Books
- 정환승, "태국어의 빠이", paj, ma, pp.에 관한 연구, 동남아연구[DOI]
- Jung, Hwan Seung, "A comparative study on Korean and Thai directional verbs (한국어와 태국어의 방향동사 연구)", Journal of South-east Asian Studies, 15(2), pp.75~106 (2009)
- Kil, Bon Il, "‘oda", gada’ and viewpoint. (‘오다, Studies in Korean, pp.1996, 6[DOI]
- Kim, Jong do, "Aspectual meanings of auxiliary verbs ‘oda’", ‘gada’(도움 움직씨 ‘오다, Hangeul, pp.1996, 233[DOI]
- Lakoff, George, "Women, fire, and dangerous things" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind And its challenge to western thought" (1999), Basic Books
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Grammar and Conceptualization" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- ’ and its semantic extensions(동사 ‘가다’의 의미), "Korean", 2000, 1~17
- Lee, Min Woo, "A cognitive semantic study on Korean motion verbs (국어 이동동사의 인지적 의미연구)", 석사, pp.2002
- Lim, Ji Ryong, "A cognitive linguistic research on meaning (의미의 인지언어학적 탐색)" (2008), Hankuk moonhwasa
- ’ (‘가다’의 의미 확장에 대한 연구), "석사", Konkuk University, 2004
- Thepkanjana, Kingkarn, "Serial verb constructions in Thai", 박사, pp.1986
- Ungerer, Friedrich, "An Introduction to cognitive linguistics" (1996), Addison Wesley Longman
- คฺยอง อึน ปาร์ค., "ปรากฏการณ์พหุนัยของคำว่า 가다", gada, 박사, pp.มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, ภาควิชาภาษา ศาสตร์, สาขาวิชาภาษาศาสตร์[DOI]
- จรัสดาว อินทรทัศน์, "กระบวนการที่คำกริยากลายเป็นคำบุพบทในภาษาไทย", 박사, pp.1996
- ชัชวดี ศรลัมพ์, "การศึกษามโนทัศน์ของคำว่า เข้า", pp.1995
- นันทนา วงษ์ไทย, "อุปลักษณ์ประสาทสัมผัสในภาษาไทย: การศึกษาตามแนว ภาษาศาสตร์ปริชาน", 박사, pp.2009
- ยาใจ ชูวิชา., "ความเป็นประโยคของหน่วยสร้างกริยาเรียงในภาษาไทย", 박사, pp.1993
- ราชบัณฑิตยสถาน, "พจนานุกรมฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน พ.ศ.2542" (2003), บริษัทนานมีบุ๊คส์ พับลิเคชั่นส์
- ราชบัณฑิตยสถาน, "ศัพท์ภาษาศาสตร์ ฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน" (2003), ผู้ แต่ง
- สุดา รังกุพันธุ์., "กริยารอง ไป และ มา ในภาษาไทย", 박사, pp.1992
- อมรา ประสิทธิ์รัฐสินธุ์, "หน่วยสร้างที่มีข้อขัดแย้งในไวยากรณ์ไทย" (2006), โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย