태국의 싸릿(Sarit) 정부와 국왕의 역할
Sarit Government and the role of King
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out the cause and role of the king's authority, which had been tarnished since the 1932 coup, restored its authority in the Sarit government. It can be seen that King Bhumibol's authority has been exercised an important function increasingly in Thai politics since the Sarit government in 1957. In other words, in addition to the symbolic center of national integration, the king's role as a person who gives legitimacy to political power, a supporter and legitimacy of government policy, a supporter of solidarity between political elites, and an "mediator" to transfer donations has increased. These dramatic changes were the result of the Sarit government's policy. Sarit had a political thought that focused on recreating a society consisting of three classes: king, Buddhism, and people. He also sought legitimacy for himself and his regime by instilling the perception that the regime and the king are the closest beings. Eventually, since establishing a strategic alliance with the Sarit government, King Bhumibol has secured extensive influence in all areas of Thailand's politics, economy, and culture.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the cause and role of the king's authority, which had been tarnished since the 1932 coup, restored its authority in the Sarit government. It can be seen that King Bhumibol's authority has been exercised an important function increasingly in Thai politics since the Sarit government in 1957. In other words, in addition to the symbolic center of national integration, the king's role as a person who gives legitimacy to political power, a supporter and legitimacy of government policy, a supporter of solidarity between political elites, and an "mediator" to transfer donations has increased. These dramatic changes were the result of the Sarit government's policy. Sarit had a political thought that focused on recreating a society consisting of three classes: king, Buddhism, and people. He also sought legitimacy for himself and his regime by instilling the perception that the regime and the king are the closest beings. Eventually, since establishing a strategic alliance with the Sarit government, King Bhumibol has secured extensive influence in all areas of Thailand's politics, economy, and culture.
참고문헌 (18)
- Chaloemtiarana, Tak, "Asia", pp.41~56 (1976), Asia Society
- Chaloemtiarana, Tak, "Chantornwong Sombat and Thanapbonphan", pp.35~82 (1976), I Thai Textbook Project
- Chaloemtiarana, Tak, "Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism" (2007), O.S. Printing House
- Mahakan, Paradi, "태국 정치사" (1984), Silapabannasan
- Mosel, James N., "Toward a Comparative Study of Public Administration", The Department of Government, Indiana University Press
- Thailand and Japanese Presence, 1941-1945, "Numnonda, Thamsook", ISEAS, ~, pp.Research Notes and Disscussion, No. 6 (1977)
- Phamonmontri, Prayoon, "Bangkok : Social Science Association of Thailand)", pp.36~50 (1978), Social Science Association of Thailand
- Riggs, Fred W., "The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity" (1966), East-West Center Press
- Santisombat, Yot, "태국 정치의 권력, 개성, 지도자" (1990), Rongpim nam thai
- Sayamnon, Rong, "헌법체제에서 태국의 역사" (1977), Thai Wattanapanich
- Sichan, Rian, "1912년 반란" (1974), National Student Center of Thailand
- Singthong, Siphanom, "태국국왕들의 왕실의식" (1962), Odeon Store Press
- Sinsavat, Narong, "태국정치: 심리학적 분석" (1996), Orian Tels Keola
- Sirisantisuk, Somsak, "태국사회" (1985), Prae Pittya Press
- Teeravekin, Likhit, "태국 정치의 전개" (1992), Thammasart University Press
- Teeravit, Kiyan, "태국정치의 위기" (1991), Matichon Press
- Yano, Toru, "Thailand: A Rice Growing Society" (1978), Kyoto University
- Wilson, David A., "Politics in Thailand" (1962), Cornell University Press