본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

푸미폰 국왕의 정치개입 요인 분석

The Analysis on the Factors of Bhumibol Adulyadej's Political Interventions

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Abstract

This research analyzes both the pull and push factors of the Thai constitutional monarch's political interventions. The temporary research results are as follows. The first pull factor is the crisis of political legitimacy which brought the Thai constitutional monarch's political interventions. Everytime the coups and political upheavals took place, the King filled the political vacuums and became the key legitimizer to provide the legitimacy to the political system. But, in any case, the King's political interventions as a legitimizer caused successive political instability. Another pull factor is the political groups' exploitation of the King. In this situation the King could be exploited, otherwise he sided with them passively or actively according to the situation. The King's primary aim is to protect or strengthen the kingship. The push factors are both the political strengths and the preserving or strengthening the constitutional monarchy. The primary political strengths are the King's charisma which is complemented by the other prominent factors. Even though the legitimacy crisis created the King's political interventions, if not the political strengths, the political interventions could not happen. Of course, the King's political strengths are not the direct factors of the political interventions, but without these, the political interventions might be impossible. The King's charisma can be found in Dhammaraja's characteristics. Whenever the King presents the political solution at the time of political upheavals, the people follow his decisions for solving the political crisis because of having faith in the King's charisma as Dhammaraja. Lastly, Another push factor is the preserving or strengthening the constitutional monarchy. Even the charismatic King as Dhammaraja played the political role in order to solve the political crisis, it is not clear whether his actions are for national interests or own political interests for himself or the royal family. Accordingly, it is also important to analyze the political interventions in terms of the King's political power.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김홍구, ""입헌군주제하에서의 태국국왕의 카리스마와 정치적 역할:푸미폰(Bhumibol Adulyadej)국왕을 중심으로."서울대 지역종합연구소."국제지역연구"7권 1호(1998년 봄호)" (1998)
  2. 김홍구, "태국의 선거제도 변화와 정당체제", 국제지역연구, 9(4), pp.3~34 (2006), 국제지역연구센터
  3. 김홍구, "태국의 탁씬 정부와 군부 쿠데타", 동남아연구, 16(2), pp.49~87 (2007), 동남아연구소
  4. 김홍구, "태국정치입문" (2008), 부산외대 출판부
  5. 주한태국대사관 자료, "주한태국대사관 자료", ~
  6. 1997년 헌법, 2007년 헌법, "1997년 헌법, 2007년 헌법", ~
  7. Anderson Benedict, "Withdrawal Symptoms: Social and Cultural Aspects of the October 6 Coup" (1990), Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars
  8. Bhumibol Adulayadej, "Phraraachadamrat Phraraach -ataan Kae Prachachon-thai Nai Okaat Wan-kheun-piimai 1961 in: Nai Phraraachadamrat Lae Phraboromrachaowatt Kheong Phrabaatsomdetphracaoyuhua Bhumiphon Adulayadej Lae Somdejphranaangcao Sirikit Phraboromraachinii", Longphim Bandaansaat, ~ (1961)
  9. Bowie, "Rituals of National Loyalty: An Anthropology of the State and the Village Scout Movements in Thailand" (1997), Colombia Univ. Press
  10. Chaleomtiarana, "Kaan-muang Rabop Pheo-khun- Upatham Baep Phadetkaan", Samnak-phim Mahaawithayaalai Thammasaat
  11. Dhiravegin, "Siam Colonialism(1855-1909)" (1975), Thai Wattana Panich Co
  12. Eisenstadt, S. N, "Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building" (1968), the University of Chicago Press
  13. Girth, H. H, "From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology" (1947), Routledge
  14. Handley, "The King Never Smiles" (2006), Yale University Press
  15. Hewison, "Political Change in Thailand: democracy and participation" (1997), Routledge
  16. Hong, "Thailand in 1984: Towards a Political Modus Vivendi in: Southeast Asian Affairs" (1985), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  17. Ishii, "Sangha, State and Society: Thai Buddhism in History" (1986), The University of Hawaii Press
  18. Kershaw, "A Little Question of Dynastic Survival: King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand", Contemporary Review, 234(5), pp.256~ (1979)
  19. Kershaw, "Monarchy in South-East Asia" (2001), Routledge
  20. Kobkua, "The monarchy and constitutional change since 1972 in: Reforming Thai Politics" (2002), NIAS Press
  21. Kobkua, "Kings, Country and Constitutions" (2004), Routledge Curzon
  22. Marks, "Making Revolution: The Insurgency of the Communist Party of Thailand in Structural Perspective" (1994), White Lotus
  23. McCargo, "Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crises in Thailand", The Pacific Review, 18(4) (2005)
  24. Morell, David, "Political Conflict in Thailand" (1981), Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain, Publishers
  25. Phongpaichit,Pasuk, "Thailand: Economy and Politics" (1994), Oxford University Press
  26. Pongsudhirak, "Thailand: Democratic Authoritarianism in: Southeast Asian Affairs 2003" (2003), ISEAS
  27. Prawese, "Overview of Political Reform in: Reforming Thai Politics" (2002), NIAS Press
  28. Rustow, "A World of Nations: Problems of Political Modernization" (1967), The Brookings Institution
  29. Samudavanija, "The Thai Young Turks" (1982), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  30. Scalapino, "Asian Political Institutionalization" (1986), Institute of East Asian Studies
  31. Suriyamongkol, "Institutionalization of Democratic Political Process in Thailand: a Three -Pronged Democratic Polity" (1998), Thammasat Univ. Press
  32. Tha Kruaimai Na Ayuthya, "Thosaphitharaachatham(열가지법)" (1993), Tonoo
  33. Tullis,F, "Politics and Social Change in Third World Countries" (1973), John Wiley and Sons
  34. Turton, "Thailand: Roots of Conflict" (1978), Spokesman
  35. Ungpakorn, "A Coup for the Rich" (2007), Workers Democracy Publishing
  36. Ungpakorn, "Thailand's Military Coup: Liberalism and Dictatorship Deepen the Crisis", 6월 민주화항쟁 20주년 동아시 아 민주주의 국제심포지엄 발표문 (2007), 성공회대 민주주의와 사회운동연구소
  37. 한국일보, "한국일보 2008", 08, pp.2008, ~
  38. 서울 뉴시스, "서울 뉴시스2009", 01, pp.2009, ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)