학교교육에서 성교육의 문제
A Study on the sexuality education of schooling in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
유교적 전통이 강한 우리 사회에서는 대체로 성적 욕망을 부정하거나 무시해왔다. 1990년을 전후하여 우리 사회가 소비사회로 변화함에 따라 성적 쾌락에 관한 관심이 크게 증대되었으며, 성에 대한 청소년의 의식과 문화도 급변하고 있다. 성에 관한 사회적 관심의 증대와 청소년 성의식과 성문화의 변화는 학교교육에서 이 문제를 적극적으로 다루어야 할 필요성을 낳고 있다. 이 논문은 성의 문제에 대한 논의를 교육 영역에서 제기하기 위한 시론적인 성격을 띠고 있다. 이 연구에서는 첫째 제7차 교육과정에서 성교육이 어떻게 이루어지고 있는가를 살펴보았으며, 둘째 도덕 교과(Moral Subject)를 중심으로 성교육의 내용을 살펴보았으며, 셋째 도덕 교과에서 제시하고 있는 성교육의 문제점을 비판적으로 분석하였으며, 넷째 바람직한 성교육의 방향을 위해 필요한 교육적 노력에 대해 살펴보았다.
Abstract
The problem of sexuality has significant meanings in social level as well as in individual level. In individual level, it is related with the realization of the greatest desire human being have, sexual desire. In social level, it has the meaning of social maintenance and labor reproduction through the childbirth. In Korea, where sexual desire had been denied and neglected in strong confucian tradition, the concern about it increased around 1990 as Korea reached to a consuming society. School couldn't avoid this issue as the social interest increased. It is both social and adolescents' demand to take it into schooling. This article examined the problem of sexuality education in a tentative style in educational sector. This study examined, firstly how it was treated in schooling, especially in the 7th school curriculum and Moral Subject, secondly critically analysed the premises of Moral Subject on it, thirdly considered educational necessary efforts for desirable sexuality education. The results of this study are as follows; The premise of Moral Subject was based on Cartesian dualism, so that the value of sexuality was denied or neglected. Recently many studies were being carried to criticize the Cartesian dualism, and those argued that human reason was based on body. Those results showed the possibility of unity of body and mind, and that means we should think of human being as united being of both. Besides, Moral Subject supported the equality of both sexes formally, but premised discrimination of them actually. This is not suitable to the spirit of the times which is to realize the society of the equality of both sexes. It is not persuasive to demand to subdue our sexual desire in society where it is regarded as important to realize the desire of body. Desire itself is not problematic, and it is more important task to deliberate the meaning of the realization of the desire in our lives, and to utilize it desirably for our lives. Out of denying it, We should start in schooling from the acknowledgement of desire of body.