본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터넷 악성댓글에 있어 낮은 자기통제력과 인터넷사이트 환경요인의 조건적 작용과 그 남녀 차이

A Gender Difference in Conditioning Effect between Low Self-Control and Internet Environmental Variables on Internet Bullying

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This s tudy t ests t he e f f ect of low self -control o n internet b ullying behavior and also analyzes the conditioning effect of low self-control by internet environmental factors including both collective efficacy (trust/cohesion and informal control) and internet subculture. This study tests a gender difference in interaction effect between low self-control and both environmental variables on internet bullying behavior. Using data from surveying 576 middle school students in Seoul, 2007, results show that there are gender differences. It is revealed that the effect of low self control is stronger on female than on male and also results show that the effect of internet subculture is stronger on female than on male, while the effect of informal control is stronger on male than on female. It is found that the interaction effect between low self-control and internet subculture is significant only on female, while interaction effects between low self-control and collective efficacy variables are not significant on both male and female.

Abstract

This s tudy t ests t he e f f ect of low self -control o n internet b ullying behavior and also analyzes the conditioning effect of low self-control by internet environmental factors including both collective efficacy (trust/cohesion and informal control) and internet subculture. This study tests a gender difference in interaction effect between low self-control and both environmental variables on internet bullying behavior. Using data from surveying 576 middle school students in Seoul, 2007, results show that there are gender differences. It is revealed that the effect of low self control is stronger on female than on male and also results show that the effect of internet subculture is stronger on female than on male, while the effect of informal control is stronger on male than on female. It is found that the interaction effect between low self-control and internet subculture is significant only on female, while interaction effects between low self-control and collective efficacy variables are not significant on both male and female.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 민수홍, "청소년의 자기통제력이 비행과 범죄에 미치는 영향: 패널자료를 이용한 인과성 및 일반성 검증", 청소년학연구, 13(6), pp.27~47 (2006), 한국청소년학회
  2. 박정선, "지역사회중심의 청소년비행 대책", 한국범죄학, 1(2), pp.3~39 (2007)
  3. 이성식, "사이버공간에서의 익명성이 언어플레이밍에 미치는 영향에서의 경로모델의 제시와 검증", 형사정책, 16(2), pp.165~185 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
  4. 이성식, "사이버상의 청소년비행에 대한 일반이론의 검증", 한국공안행정학회보, (21), pp.227~249 (2005), 한국공안행정학회
  5. 이성식, "낮은 자기 통제력과 비행친구의 청소년비행에의 영향 : 청소년패널자료의 분석", 한국청소년연구, 18(2), pp.159~181 (2007), 한국청소년정책연구원
  6. 이성식, "청소년비행에서 개인성향요인과 사회학습요인들의 조건적 효과 : 두 이론의 검증", 형사정책연구, 22(4), pp.1~22 (2011), 한국형사정책연구원[DOI]
  7. 이성식, "인터넷사이트 집합적 효율성과 사이버언어폭력", 형사정책연구, 19(1), pp.167~189 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  8. Arneklev, B.J, "Low Self-Control and Imprudent Behavior", Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, pp.225~247 (1993)
  9. Baron, S.W, "Self-Control, Social Consequences, and Criminal Behavior: Street Youth and the General Theory of Crime", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, pp.403~425 (2003)
  10. Bellair, P.E, "Social Interaction and Community Crime: Examining the Importance of Neighbor Networks", Criminology, 35, pp.677~704 (1997)
  11. Bursik, R.J, "Neighborhoods and Crime" (1993), Lexington Books
  12. Burton, V.S.Jr, "Gender, Self-control and Crime", Journal of Research inCrime and Delinquency, 35, pp.123~147 (1998)
  13. Chapple, C.L, "Self-Control, Peer Relations, and Delinquency", Justice Quarterly, 22, pp.89~106 (2005)
  14. Cohen, L, "Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activities Approach", American Sociological Review, 44, pp.588~608 (1979)
  15. Daigle, L.E, "Gender Differences in the Predictors of Juveni le Delinquency", Youth Vi olence and Juvenile Justice, 5(3), pp.254~286 (2007)
  16. Elliott, D.S, "The Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Adolescent Development", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, pp.389~426 (1996)
  17. Evans, T.D, "The Social Consequences of Self-Control: Testing theGeneral Theory of Crime", Criminology, 35, pp.475~501 (1997)
  18. Gibbs, J.J, "Self-Control and Its Manifestations among University Students: An Empirical Test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime", Justice Quarterly, 12, pp.231~235 (1995)
  19. Gottfredson, M.R, "A General Theory of Crime" (1990), Stanford University Press
  20. Grasmick, H.G, "Tesing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, pp.5~29 (1993)
  21. Hay, C, "Self-Control Theory and the Concept of Opportunity: The Case for a More Systematic Union", Criminology, 46(4), pp.1039~1071 (2008)
  22. Jones, S, "In Eye of the Impulsi ve Behavi or: The Interaction between Impulsivity and Perceived Informal Social Control od Offending", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, pp.307~321 (2009)
  23. Keane, C, "Dri nking and Dri vi ng, Self-Control a nd G ender: T esti ng a G eneral T heory of Crime", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, pp.30~46 (1993)
  24. LaGrange, T.C, "Low Self-Control and Opprtunity: Testing the General Theory of Crime as an Explanation for Gender Differences in Delinquency", Criminology, 37, pp.41~72 (1999)
  25. Longshore, D, "Self-Control and Criminal Opportunity: A Prospective Test of the General Theory of Crime", Social Problems, 45, pp.102~113 (1998)
  26. Longshore, D, "Self-Control and Criminal Opportunity: Cross-sectional Test of the General Theory of Crime", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, pp.281~298 (1998)
  27. Longshore, D, "Self-Control and Social Bonds: A Combined Control Perspective on Deviance", Crime and Delinquency, 50, pp.542~564 (2004)
  28. Lynam, D.R, "The Interaction between Impulsivity and Neighborhood Context on Offending", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, pp.563~574 (2000)
  29. Meier, M.H, "Impulsive and Callous Traits are more likely associated with Delinquent Behavior in Higher Risk Neighborhoods among Boys and Girls", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, pp.377~385 (2008)
  30. Morenoff, J, "Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence", Criminology, 39, pp.517~560 (2001)
  31. Nagin, D.S, "Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime", Law and Society Review, 3, pp.467~496 (1993)
  32. Nynam, D.R, "The Interaction between Impulsivity and Neighborhood Context on Offending", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, pp.563~574 (2000)
  33. Paternoster, R, "Multiple Routes to Delinquency? A Test of Developmental and General Theories of Crime", Criminology, 35, pp.49~84 (1997)
  34. Pratt, T.C, "The Empirical Status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime: A Meta-Analysis", Criminology, 38, pp.931~964 (2000)
  35. Sampson, R.J, "Crime i n the Maki ng: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life" (1993), Harvard University Press
  36. Sampson, R.J, "Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social Disorganization Theory", American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.774~802 (1989)
  37. Sampson, R.J, "Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy", Science, 277, pp.918~924 (1997)
  38. Sampson, R .J, "B eyond Soci al Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children", American Sociological Review, 64, pp.633~660 (1999)
  39. Shaw, C.R, "Juveni le Deli nquency and Urban Areas" (1969), ni versi ty of Chi cago Press
  40. Simons, R.L, "A Test of Latent Trait versus Life-Course Perspectives on the Atability of Adolescent Antisocial Behavior", Criminology, 36, pp.217~243 (1998)
  41. Smith, T. R, "Low Self-Control, Staged Opportunity, and Subsequent Fraudulent Behavior", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, pp.542~563 (2004)
  42. Tibbetts, S.G, "Gender Differences in Factors of Social Control and Rational Choice", Deviant Behavior, 17, pp.183~208 (1996)
  43. Thompsen, P.A, "Whats fueling the Flames in Cyberspace? a Social Influence Model, In Communications and Cyberspace" (1996), Hampton Press
  44. Vazsonyi, A.T, "Does the Effect of Impulsivity on Delinquency vary by Level of Neighborhood Disadvantage?", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, pp.511~541 (2006)
  45. Willi ams, K .R, "Percepti ons of C ollecti ve Efficacy and Bullying Perpetration in Schools", Social Problems, 59(1), pp.124~143 (2011)
  46. Wood, P.B, "Risk-Taking and Self-Control: Social Psychological Correlates of Delinquency", Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, pp.111~130 (1993)
  47. Wright, B.R, "Low Self-Control, Social Bonds, a nd C rime: Soci al C ausati on, Soci al S electi on, or Both?", Criminology, 37, pp.479~514 (1999)
  48. Zimmerman, G .M, "I mpulsi vi ty, O ffendi ng a nd N ei ghborhood: Investigating the Person-Context Nexus", Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, pp.301~332 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)