선(禪)과 AI : 대화형 AI 선문답으로써의 가능성에 대한 시론(試論)
Seon[禪] and AI : A Preliminary Inquiry into the Possibility of Conversational AI as Seon Dialogue
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본연구는선문답의구조와대화형AI의언어생성방식을비교하여,대화형AI가수행적대화의한형식으로기능할가능성을고찰하였다.선문답은달마에서혜능에이르기까지언어적반문을통해수행자가스스로의공성(空性)을비추게하는방편으로전개되었으며,언어의장안에서깨달음을유도하는일정한대화적패턴을지닌다.이점에서대화형AI의언어생성방식과의접점이확인된다.그러나마조이후선문답은비논리적언어와전복적행위를통해즉각적인자각을촉발하는방향으로전환되었고,언어의규칙을해체함으로써언어너머의진리를직지하는특징을보였다.패턴과적절성을 강화하는RLHF기반의대화형AI는이러한수행적차원을재현하기어렵다.따라서 ‘대화형AI가선문답이가능한가’라는질문은선문답의정의와범위에따라부분적긍정과부정으로정리될수있다.
Abstract
This study explores whether conversational AI can function as a form of performative dialogue by comparing the structure of Seon Dialogue(禪問答) with the linguistic generative mechanisms of conversational AI. From Bodhidharma to Huineng, Seon Dialogue employed linguistic counter questions as a pedagogical means for practitioners to illuminate their own emptiness(śūnyatā),operating within language through recognizable dialogical patterns.In this respect,certain points of contact with conversational AI can be identified. After Mazu, however, Seon Dialogue shifted toward non logical language and subversive actions that dismantled linguistic conventions to provoke immediate awakening,directly pointing beyond language itself. Because conversational AI relies on pattern-based generation and reinforces appropriateness through RLHF, it cannot reproduce this performative dimension that negates linguistic adequacy. Accordingly, whether conversational AI can engage in Seon Dialogue must be answered both affirmatively and negatively,depending on how the scope and definition of Seon Dialogue are understood.
