본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회인지와 대상관계 척도를 활용한성격 조직 수준 평가

Assessing Levels of PersonalityOrganization Using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in Nonclinical Samples

임종민|장문선|이종환
한국건강심리학회 (Korean Health Psychological Association)|2021.11|한국심리학회지: 건강 (Korean Journal of Health Psychology)|제26권 제6호|pp. 1101-1127|DOI 10.17315/kjhp.2021.26.6.008

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

대상관계object relationsSCORS-G성격 조직 수준성격 병리SCORSLPOMASClevels of personality organizationpersonality pathology
주제분류심리과학

초록

주제통각검사 자료의 사회인지와 대상관계 척도(Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale - Global rating method: SCORS-G) 평정치 평균 점수를 바탕으로 설정한 성격 조직 수준(Level of Personality Organization: LPO)의 타당성과 적절한 활용법을 모색하기 위한 목적으로 본 연구를 수행하였다. 대학생 215명과 고등학생 138명을 대상으로 정신 병리와 성격 특성 및 인지․정서․대인관계 문제를 알아보는 설문 조사를 실시한 후, 주제통각검사를 실시하고 그 결과를 SCORS-G로 평정하였다. 또 대학생 표본에서는 사회인지 평가를 위한 영상 과제를 추가로 실시하였다. 다음으로, SCORS-G의 전체 평균 점수를 기준으로 세 가지 LPO를 설정하고 수준에 따라 세 집단을 구분한 후, 집단 간 다양한 심리․성격 기능 수준의 차이를 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 대학생 표본과 고등학생 표본 모두에서 SCORS-G LPO에 따른 정신 병리․성격 특성․부적응적 심리 문제 양상의 차이가 유의하게 나타났으며, 대학생 표본에서는 마음이론 과제 수행 양상에서도 LPO에 따른 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 대학생 표본에서는 대체로 수준이 1-2-3으로 증가할수록 정신 병리와 부적응적인 심리 문제 수준이 낮아지고, 성격 특성의 안정성이 높아지며, 마음이론의 정확도가 상승하는 것으로 나타났다. 고등학생 표본에서는 대부분의 세부 영역에서 수준 1에 비해 수준 2, 3에서 더욱 양호한 기능 수준을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 LPO의 평가에 SCORS-G를 타당하게 활용할 수 있음을 시사한다. 더 나아가 논의에서는 연구 결과와 경험적․이론적 구성 개념을 조화하여 LPO의 평가에 SCORS-G를 적절히 활용하고 해석하는 방법을 고찰하고 제안하였다.

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the validity of Levels of Personality Organization (LPO) using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale - Global rating method (SCORS-G) global score ratings of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives in nonclinical samples and explore methods of its application. The TAT (1, 2, 3BM, 4, 13MF, 12M, 14) and various scales measuring psychopathological, interpersonal, cognitive and emotional problems were administered to 215 undergraduates and 138 high school students. TAT protocols were then rated with SCORS-G. Participants were classified into three LPO groups based on their overall SCORS-G composite rating. Differences of various psychological and personality functioning were analyzed among three groups categorized according to LPO. As a result, in both the university student sample and the high school student sample, there were significant differences in various psychopathologies, personality traits, and maladaptive problems among different LPO groups. Also, the performance-based theory of mind task was administered only to the university student sample and a significant differences according to LPO were found in its performance levels. In the university student sample, as LPO ascended by one level, the degree of psychopathologies and maladaptive psychological problems decreased, whereas the stability of personality traits and the accuracy of the theory of mind increased. In the high school student sample, it was found that LPO 2 and 3 showed better levels than LPO 1 in psychological and personality domains. These results suggest that the SCORS-G can be appropriately used in the evaluation of LPO. Furthermore, this study discusses how to utilize and interpret SCORS-G in assessing LPO by connecting the empirical results with theoretical LPO.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 김영환, "청소년 성격평가 질문지 실시요강" (2006), 학지사
  2. 김영환, "PAI 표준화연구: 신뢰도와 타당도", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), pp.311~329 (2001)
  3. 유성희, "PAI-A 내현화와 외현화 2요인 모형 검증 연구: 한국 청소년을 대상으로", 한국심리학회지:법, 9(3), pp.163~184 (2018), 한국법심리학회
  4. 이경임, "한국인의 NEO-PI-R 요인구조와 부적응 집단 프로파일", 박사, pp.1995
  5. 이종환, "한국판 사회인지 평가를 위한 영상", 심리학과, pp.2016
  6. 이종환, "주제통각검사를 활용한 사회인지와 대상관계 척도 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(4), pp.540~557 (2018), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  7. 이종환, "청소년 대상 사회인지와 대상관계 척도 타당화 연구", 상담학연구, 21(5), pp.117~144 (2020), 한국상담학회[DOI]
  8. 조용래, "정서조절곤란의 평가: 한국판 척도의 심리측정적 속성", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(4), pp.1015~1038 (2007), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  9. 홍상황, "한국형 대인관계문제검사 원형척도의 단축형(KIIP-SC) 구성", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), pp.923~940 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
  10. 홍정윤, "PAI 내현화 및 외현화 2요인 모형 검증 연구: 성인 교도소 수형자들을 대상으로", 한국심리학회지:법, 10(1), pp.29~45 (2019), 한국법심리학회[DOI]
  11. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, "American Psychiatric Association", American Psychiatric Association, ~ (2013)
  12. Alden, L. E., "Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems", Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3-4), pp.521~536 (1990)
  13. Ashton, M. C., "What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), pp.245~255 (2002)
  14. Bach, B., "Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2. 0 : Utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts", Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), pp.660~670 (2018)
  15. Bender, D. S., "Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, Part I : A review of theory and methods", Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), pp.332~346 (2011)
  16. Berghuis, H., "Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization(IPO-NL)", Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73(1), pp.44~60 (2009)
  17. Blatt, S. J., "Mental representations in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process", Review of General Psychology, 1(4), pp.351~374 (1997)
  18. Bornstein, R. F., "Dependency in the personality disorders : Intensity, insight, expression, and defense", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(2), pp.175~189 (1998)
  19. Caligor, E., "Psychodynamic psychotherapy for personality disorders: A clinical handbook", pp.3~35 (2010), American Psychiatric Pub
  20. Clarkin, J. F., "경계선 인성장애의 정신분석 심리치료" (2016), 학지사
  21. Costa, P. T., "Normal personality assessment in clinical practice : The NEO Personality Inventory", Psychological Assessment, 4(1), pp.5~13 (1992)
  22. DeFife, J. A., "Dimensional assessment of self-and interpersonal functioning in adolescents : Implications for DSM-5's general definition of personality disorder", Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(2), pp.248~260 (2015)
  23. DeYoung, C. G., "Toward a theory of the Big Five", Psychological Inquiry, 21(1), pp.26~33 (2010)
  24. DeYoung, C. G., "Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity : Are there neuroses of health?", Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), pp.533~552 (2002)
  25. Digman, J. M., "Higher-order factors of the Big Five", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), pp.1246~1256 (1997)
  26. Diguer, L., "The Personality Organization Diagnostic Form–II (PODF–II)" (2001), UniversitèLaval
  27. Dziobek, I., "Introducing MASC : a movie for the assessment of social cognition", Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), pp.623~636 (2006)
  28. Fossati, A., "On the relationships between DSM‐5 dysfunctional personality traits and social cognition deficits: A study in a sample of consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients", Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(6), pp.1421~1434 (2017)
  29. Frank, L. D., "Projective methods" (1948), Thomas
  30. Gamache, D., "The personality organization diagnostic form:development of a revised version", The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(5), pp.368~377 (2009)
  31. Gordon, R. M., "Construct validity of the Psychodiagnostic Chart: A transdiagnostic measure of personality organization, personality syndromes, mental functioning, and symptomatology", Psychoanalytic Psychology, 35(2), pp.280~288 (2018)
  32. Goueli, T., "Social cognition in adolescent females with borderline personality traits", Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 93(4), pp.739~753 (2020)
  33. Gratz, K. L., "Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale", Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), pp.41~54 (2004)
  34. Hamamci, Z., "The Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale : Development and psychometric characteristics", Psychological Reports, 95(1), pp.291~303 (2004)
  35. Hermes, M., "Extraversion and its positive emotional core—Further evidence from neuroscience", Emotion, 11(2), pp.367~378 (2011)
  36. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale:Global rating method (SCORS–G), "Hilsenroth, M.", The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, ~ (2004)
  37. Hopwood, C. J., "Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits", Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), pp.305~320 (2011)
  38. Horowitz, L. M., "Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), pp.885~892 (1988)
  39. Hutsebaut, J., "Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM–5level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF)", Personality Disorders:Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), pp.192~197 (2016)
  40. Hyler, S. E., "Personality questionnaire, PDQ-4+" (1994), New York State Psychiatric Institute
  41. Kernberg, O. F., "Major theories of personality disorder", pp.114~156 (2005), The Guilford Press
  42. Kernberg, O. F., "The inventory of personality organization" (1995), The New York Hospital–Cornell Medical Center
  43. Kernberg, O. F., "Severe personality disorders:Psychotherapeutic strategies" (1984), Yale University Press
  44. Koelen, J. A., "The impact of level of personality organization on treatment response: A systematic review", Psychiatry : Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 75(4), pp.355~374 (2012)
  45. Laverdière, O., "Personality organization, five-factor model, and mental health", The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(10), pp.819~829 (2007)
  46. Lingiardi, V., "Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual: PDM-2" (2017), Guilford Press
  47. McWilliams, N, "정신분석적 진단: 성격 구조의이해" (2008), 학지사
  48. Montag, C., "Different aspects of theory of mind in paranoid schizophrenia: evidence from a video-based assessment", Psychiatry Research, 186(2-3), pp.203~209 (2011)
  49. Morey, L. C., "Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual" (1991), Psychological Assessment Resources
  50. Morey, L. C., "Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM–5Level of Personality Functioning Scale", Psychological Assessment, 29(10), pp.1302~1308 (2017)
  51. Morey, L. C., "Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, Part II:Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology", Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, pp.347~353 (2011)
  52. Murray, H. A., "Manual for the Thematic Apperception Test" (1943), Harvard University Press
  53. PDM Task Force, "Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual" (2006), Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations
  54. Preißler, S., "Social cognition in borderline personality disorder : Evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others", Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, pp.182~ (2010)[DOI]
  55. Ritter, K., "Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder", Psychiatry Research, 187(1-2), pp.241~247 (2011)
  56. Ruiz, M. A., "Recovery and replication of internalizing and externalizing dimensions within the Personality Assessment Inventory", Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), pp.585~592 (2008)
  57. Sharp, C., "The Cambridge handbook of personality disorders", pp.74~90 (2020), Cambridge University Press
  58. Siefert, C. J., "Personality disorders:Toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment", pp.203~224 (2015), American Psychological Association
  59. Skodol, A. E., "Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5", Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(2), pp.136~169 (2011)
  60. Skodol, A. E., "Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale", Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2(1), pp.4~22 (2011)
  61. Stein, M. B., "사회인지와대상관계 척도 - 일반 평정법: 임상가, 상담자, 연구자를 위한 종합 지침서" (2021), 학지사
  62. Stein, M. B., "Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global rating method" (2011), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  63. Stein, M. B., "Extending the use of the SCORS–G composite ratings in assessing Level of Personality Organization", Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(2), pp.166~175 (2016)
  64. Stern, B. L., "Structured Interview of Personality Organization(STIPO) : Preliminary psychometrics in a clinical sample", Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(1), pp.35~44 (2010)
  65. Tackett, J. L., "Developmental Psychopathology Vol. 3", pp.1039~1078 (2016), Wiley
  66. Teglasi, H, "TAT와 기타 스토리텔링 평가의 핵심" (2016), 박학사
  67. Vaskinn, A., "Theory of mind in women with borderline personality disorder or schizophrenia: Differences in overall ability and error patterns", Frontiers in Psychology, 6, pp.1239~ (2015)[DOI]
  68. Watson, D., "Handbook of personality psychology", pp.767~793 (1997), Academic Press
  69. Weekers, L. C., "The Level of Personality Functioning Scale‐Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning", Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), pp.3~14 (2019)
  70. Westen, D., "A clinical-empirical model of personality: Life after the Mischelian Ice Age and the NEO-lithic era", Journal of Personality, 63, pp.495~524 (1995)
  71. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Q-sort for projective stories (SCORS–Q), "Westen, D", Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, ~ (1995)
  72. Westen, D., "A model and a method for uncovering the nomothetic from the idiographic:An alternative to the five-factor model?", Journal of Research in Personality, 30(3), pp.400~413 (1996)
  73. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Q-sort for interview and narrative data (SCORS-Q), "Westen, D.", Department of Psychiatry, The Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, ~ (1996)
  74. Westen, D., "Object relations in childhood and adolescence: The development of working representations", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), pp.400~409 (1991)
  75. Westen, D, "Object relations and social cognition: TAT scoring manual" (1985), University of Michigan

관련 논문AI추천

주제통각검사를 활용한 사회인지와 대상관계 척도 타당화 연구이종환, 임종민, 장문선한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제4호대인관계 스트레스가 경계선 성격장애 경향 집단의 정서경험과 대상표상에 미치는 영향이종환, 임종민, 장문선한국상담심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료2019 · 제31권 제4호반사회성 성격장애 경향군의 사회인지 결함곽호완, 윤민혁, 이종환, 임종민, 장문선한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제3호표상의 인지와 정서 양상, 정서조절 곤란, 대인관계 문제의 관계이종환, 임종민, 장문선한국상담학회 · 상담학연구2022 · 제23권 제3호한국판 성격조직화 척도(IPO)의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구김영란, 이영호한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2015 · 제34권 제1호한국판 대상관계질문지 타당화 연구박부형, 이영호한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2004 · 제23권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

초월적 시간관 척도(TFTPS) 타당화이덕희, 이동훈, 남슬기pp. 961-983한국판 보상적 섭식 욕구 척도의 타당화권석만, 양진원pp. 985-1003사회불안수준과 부적 사후반추정도 간의 관계: 상태 자기자비수준의 매개역할조용래, 김경진pp. 1005-1023수용전념치료가 대학생의 대인관계문제 및 정서표현양가성에 미치는 효과: 화상통화 집단상담을 중심으로최성진, 김민지pp. 1025-1039자기비난 수준에 따른 인지적 유연성의 차이조현주, 정현희pp. 1041-1060
원문 보기