본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국판 성격조직화 척도(IPO)의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구

A Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Inventory of Personality Organization

이영호|김영란
한국임상심리학회 (Korean Clinical Psychology Association)|2015.02|Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology|제34권 제1호|pp. 77-102|DOI 10.15842/kjcp.2015.34.1.005

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

신뢰도psychometric propertiesreliabilityvalidity타당도확인적 요인분석confirmatory factor analysis심리측정적 속성성격조직화 척도(IPO)Inventory of Personality Organization(IPO)
주제분류심리과학

초록

본 연구는 성격조직화 척도(Inventory of Personality Organization: IPO)(Kernberg & Clarkin, 1995; Clarkin, Foelsch, & Kernberg, 2001)의 주요 3개 하위 척도(원시적 방어기제, 정체감 혼란, 현실검증력 손상)에 대한 심리측정적 속성을 검토하였다. 대학생 477명을 대상으로 하였으며, IPO와 함께, 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(PANAS), 공격성 척도(AQ-K), 한국판 역학연구센터 우울 척도(CES-D), 상태-특성 불안 척도(STAI), 정서곤란 척도(DERS-K) 등의 정서 관련 척도와 대상관계와 애착의 질을 반영하는 성인애착 척도(ASS), 그리고 각 하위 척도와 관련이 있는 개념을 측정하는 세 가지 척도, 즉 방어유형 측정 척도(DSQ), 자기개념 명료성 척도(SCS) 및 자기안정성 척도(SSS), 분열형 성격장애 척도 단축형(SPQ-B)을 실시하였다. 또한 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 측정하기 위해 4주 간의 간격을 두고 일부 참가자에게 IPO를 재실시하였다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, IPO는 양호한 내적 합치도와 높은 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 보였다. 둘째, 확인적 요인분석을 통해 IPO 주요 척도의 요인구조를 알아본 결과, 원시적 방어기제, 정체감 혼란, 현실검증력 손상의 3요인 모델이 가장 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, IPO와 관련 척도 간의 상관분석에서 IPO의 수렴타당도와 준거타당도를 지지하는 결론이 도출되었다. 넷째, IPO의 각 하위척도 점수를 기준으로 신경증적 성격조직화 집단, 경계선적 성격조직화 집단, 정신증적 성격조직화 집단의 심리정서적 특성을 비교한 결과, 심리정서적 특성에 있어서 유의미한 집단 간 차이가 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 종합해 볼 때, IPO는 양호한 신뢰도와 타당도를 가진 척도인 것으로 판단된다.

Abstract

This report describes the psychometric properties of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization(IPO; Kernberg & Clarkin, 1995; Clarkin, Foelsch, & Kernberg, 2001), which assess Primitive Defenses, Identity Diffusion, and Impairment of Reality Testing in a nonclinical sample. Participants (N=477) completed the IPO and measures of theoretically related concepts. The results were as follows. First, the three IPO scales displayed adequate internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. Second, confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure of the IPO (i.e., Primitive Defense, Identity Diffusion, and Impairment of Reality Testing). Third, each of the three IPO scales was associated with an immature defense mechanism, lack of self-concept clarity, and schizotypy. as well as a negative affect, aggression, anxiety, depression, emotional dysregulation, and insecure attachment. Finally, differences in psychological and emotional features were observed between a neurotic personality organization group, a borderline personality organization group, and a psychotic personality organization group. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the IPO possesses an appreciable reliability and validity.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. 계은주, "특성불안과 우울수준에 따른 자아방어기제 사용", 석사, 교육심리, pp.2001
  2. 김은정, "우울 증상과 대인관계 취약성 : 성인기 애착관계 형성을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지 : 임상, 17, pp.139~153 (1998)
  3. 金正澤, "特性 不安과 社會性과의 關係", 석사, pp.1978
  4. 손승연, "성인애착과 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙의 관계 : 자아존중감과 성적자기주장의 매개효과", 석사, 임상심리ㆍ상담심리학, pp.2011
  5. 서수균, "한국판 공격성 질문지의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(2), pp.487~501 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
  6. 양현정, "대학생활적응에 영향을 미치는 일상적 스트레스와 자아존중감의 상호작용효과 : 자아존중감의 안정성 및 수준을 중심으로", 석사, 심리학, pp.2003
  7. 윤선아, "한국판 분열형 성격장애 척도-단축형(Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief: SPQ-B)의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(2), pp.491~504 (2010), 한국임상심리학회
  8. 이수현, "자기 복잡성과 자기 개념 명료성이 심리적 적응에 미치는 영향", 석사, 사회심리학, pp.2005
  9. 이현희, "한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도 (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), pp.935~946 (2003), 한국임상심리학회
  10. 전겸구, "통합적 한국판 CES-D 개발", 한국심리학회지 : 건강, 6, pp.59~76 (2001)
  11. 조성호, "한국판 방어유형 질문지 타당화 연구", 한국심리학회지; 상담과 심리치료, 11, pp.115~137 (1999)
  12. 조용래, "정서조절곤란의 평가: 한국판 척도의 심리측정적 속성", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(4), pp.1015~1038 (2007), 한국임상심리학회
  13. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" (2000), American Psychiatric Press
  14. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" (2013), American Psychiatric Press
  15. Arntz, A., "Can personality disorders be changed?", Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 62, pp.8~18 (2006)
  16. Bandalos, D. L., "New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling", pp.269~296 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
  17. Berghuis, H., "Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization(IPO-NL)", Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73, pp.44~60 (2009)
  18. Bond, M., "Empirical study of self-rated defense styles", Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, pp.333~338 (1983)
  19. Bollen, K. A., "Structural equations with latent variables" (1989), Wiley
  20. Buckholdt, K. E., "Emotion regulation as a mediator of the relation between emotion socialization and deliberate self harm", American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, pp.482~490 (2009)
  21. Buss, A., "The aggression questionnaire", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp.452~459 (1992)
  22. Campbell, J. D., "Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlations and cultural boundaries", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.141~156 (1996)
  23. Clarkin, J. F., "Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO)" (2004), Weil Cornell Medical College
  24. Clarkin, J. F., "The Inventory of Personality Organization" (2001), The Personality Disorders Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Weil College of Medicine of Cornell University
  25. Clarkin, J. F., "An object relations model of borderline pathology", Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, pp.474~499 (2007)
  26. Collins, N. L., "Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couple", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp.644~663 (1990)
  27. Comtois, K. A., "Relationship between borderline personality disorder and Axis I diagnosis in severity of depression and anxiety", The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, pp.752~758 (1999)
  28. Diguer, L., "The Personality Organizations Diagnostic Form(PODF)", Université Laval, ~, pp.Unpublished manuscript (1996)
  29. Ellison, W. D., "Factor structure of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a nonclinical sample using exploratory structural equation modeling", Psychological Assessment, 24, pp.503~517 (2012)
  30. Fonagy, P., "Attachment and borderline personality disorder", Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, pp.1129~1146 (2000)
  31. Fornel, C., "Evaluating structural evaluations model with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.39~50 (1981)
  32. Gamache, D., "The Personality Organization Diagnostic Form : Development of a revised version", Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, pp.368~377 (2009)
  33. Gratz, K. L., "Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation : Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties of emotion regulation scale", Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, pp.41~54 (2004)
  34. Gunderson, J. G., "Competing models of personality disorders", Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, pp.60~68 (1991)
  35. Herr, N. R., "Difficulties with emotion regulation mediate the relationship between borderline personality disorder symptom severity and interpersonal problems", Personality and Mental Health, 7, pp.191~202 (2013)
  36. Igarashi, H., "The Inventory of Personality Organization: Its psychometric properties among student and clinical populations in Japan", Annals of General Psychiatry, 8, pp.9~ (2009)
  37. Igarashi, H., "Effects of child abuse history on borderline personality traits, negative life events, and depression : a study among a university student population in Japan", Psychiatry Research, 180, pp.120~125 (2010)
  38. Kernberg, O. F., "Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism" (1975), Jason Aronson
  39. Kernberg, O. F., "Severe personality disorders" (1984), Yale University Press
  40. Kemberg, O. F., "Major theories of personality disorder", pp.106~140 (2005), Guilford Press
  41. Kernberg, O. F., "The Inventory of Personality Organization" (1995), The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center
  42. Krueger, R. F., "Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood : A dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM–V", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, pp.537~550 (2005)
  43. Lenzenweger, M. F., "The Inventory of Personality Organization : Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample", Psychological Assessment, 13, pp.577~591 (2001)
  44. Lenzenweger, M. F., "Exploring the interface of neurobehaviorally linked personality dimensions and personality organization in borderline personality disorder : the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and Inventory of Personality Organization", Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, pp.902~918 (2012)
  45. Little, T. D., "To parcel or not to parcel : Exploring the question, weighing the merits", Structural equation modeling, 9, pp.151~173 (2002)
  46. Little, T. D., "Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one", Psychological Methods, 18, pp.285~300 (2013)
  47. Livesley, W. J., "Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis", pp.153~190 (2003), American Psychiatric Association
  48. Lowyck, B., "Levels of personality functioning and their association with clinical features and interpersonal functioning in patients with personality disorders", Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, pp.320~336 (2013)
  49. MacCallum, R. C., "Sample size in factor analysis", Psychological Methods, 4, pp.84~99 (1999)
  50. Millon, T., "Major theories of personality disorder", pp.221~346 (2005), Guilford Press
  51. Nunnally, J. C, "Psychometric theory" (1994), McGraw-Hill
  52. Radloff, L. S., "The CES-D Scale : A self-report depression scale for research in the general population", Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, pp.385~401 (1977)
  53. Raine, A., "The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria", Schizotypal Bulletin, 17, pp.555~564 (1991)
  54. Raine, A., "The SPQ-B : a brief screeing instrument for schizotypal personality disorder", Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, pp.346~355 (1995)
  55. Rosenberg, M., "Conceiving the self" (1979), Basic Books
  56. Saulsman, L. M., "The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature : a meta-analytic review", Clinical Psychology Review, 23, pp.1055~1085 (2004)
  57. Smits, D. J. M., "The Inventory of Personality Organization-Revised : Construction of an abridged version", European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, pp.223~230 (2009)
  58. Stern, B. L., "Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO): Preliminary psychometrics in a clinical sample", Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, pp.35~44 (2010)
  59. Spielberger, C. D., "Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory" (1970), Consulting Psychologist Press, Inc
  60. Spitzer, R. L., "Clinical utility of five dimensional systems for personality diagnosis : A"consumer preference"study", Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, pp.356~374 (2008)
  61. Thompson, R. A., "Emotion regulation : A theme in search of definition", Monographs of the society for research in child development, 59, pp.25~52 (1994)
  62. Trull, T. J., "Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder", Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, pp.355~380 (2005)
  63. Verreault, M., "Assessment of personality organization in couple relationships : factorial structure of the inventory of personality organization and incremental validity over neuroticism", Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, pp.85~95 (2014)
  64. Watson, D., "Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders : A quantitative hierarchical model for DSM–V", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, pp.522~536 (2005)
  65. Watson, D., "Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect : The PANAS scales", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, pp.1063~1070 (1988)
  66. West, S. G., "Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications", pp.56~75 (1995), Sage
  67. Widiger, T. A., "Toward DSM–V and the classification of psychopathology", Psychological Bulletin, 126, pp.946~963 (2000)
  68. Widiger, T. A., "Diagnostic categories or dimensions : A question for DSM–V", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, pp.494~504 (2005)
  69. Zanarini, M. D., "Pathways to the development of borderline personality disorder", Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, pp.93~104 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

한국판 대상관계질문지 타당화 연구박부형, 이영호한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2004 · 제23권 제4호한국판 Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scale의 확인적 요인분석: 임상표본을 대상으로김상훈, 김정호, 김학렬, 박상학, 이문인, 임남열한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2011 · 제30권 제1호한국판 정신화 불균형 척도 타당화김은석한국발달지원학회 · 발달지원연구2023 · 제12권 제1호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지(K-PID-5) 타당화: 반복 연구김율리, 홍태화, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제4호유기불안, 미성숙한 방어기제, 그리고 경계선적 성격특성의 관계오남경한국재활심리학회 · 재활심리연구2017 · 제24권 제1호한국판 ICD-11 성격장애 심각도 평가 (PDS-ICD-11)의 타당화곽경화, 권은정, 김율리, 양재원, 김미리혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2023 · 제28권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

조현병 환자의 사회인지 능력 측정을 위한 사회행동 배열과제 개정판의 타당도 연구권정혜, 이지예, 강여정, 이은선, 김나라pp. 1-16한국판 패배감 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구 및 패배감과 속박감의 요인구조이소영, 이종선, 권정혜, 조현주pp. 17-36전산화 집행 기능 재활이 조현병 환자의 인지 기능 향상에 미치는 효과김명선, 박주현pp. 37-60누적 아동기 외상이 성폭력 피해 아동의 정서조절과 외상후스트레스장애 증상에 미치는 영향오경자, 최지영pp. 61-76MMPI-2-RF 척도의 진단적 유용성: 양극성장애, 주요우울장애, 조현병 집단의 비교문경주, 육근영, 김지혜, 한경희pp. 103-123
원문 보기