우리나라의 MDP 도입방안에 관한 연구
A Study on MDP in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Multi-disciplinary Practice(hereinafter MDP) refers to the practice of lawyers and nonlegal professionals engaging in a business partnership. The approval of MDP and its extent differs in each country, depending on factors such as the country’s legal system, lawyer system, and legal environment. Countries that disapprove MDP are the United States and Japan. Countries that approve MDP are England, Germany, and Australia. The need and call for an one-stop service from the market will likely increase more and more, consequently resulting in the global trend of MDP’s approval. At this point, Korea should immediately launch studies and discussions on MDP to come up with a ‘Korean MDP’ and systemize the practice. Not only would this be a means to provide the people a service that well suits the changing phases of time, but it would also be an opportunity to expand Korea’s legal market as well as increase the country’s legal competitiveness. If Korea adopts MDP, I suggest the followings. First, discussions in Korea on MDP should be mainly focused on business partnership between lawyers and paralegals. Second, MDP form should be allowed only to law firms. Third, non-lawyers can be partner of MDP. However, lawyer should have interests more than 50 % of the MDP. Fourth, articles for form change from the current law firm to MDP is needed. Fifth, Ministry of Justice should be the licensing authorities for MDP. Sixth, discipline of non-lawyer specialists of MDP may be done by other laws that control the non-lawyer specialists.
Abstract
Multi-disciplinary Practice(hereinafter MDP) refers to the practice of lawyers and nonlegal professionals engaging in a business partnership. The approval of MDP and its extent differs in each country, depending on factors such as the country’s legal system, lawyer system, and legal environment. Countries that disapprove MDP are the United States and Japan. Countries that approve MDP are England, Germany, and Australia. The need and call for an one-stop service from the market will likely increase more and more, consequently resulting in the global trend of MDP’s approval. At this point, Korea should immediately launch studies and discussions on MDP to come up with a ‘Korean MDP’ and systemize the practice. Not only would this be a means to provide the people a service that well suits the changing phases of time, but it would also be an opportunity to expand Korea’s legal market as well as increase the country’s legal competitiveness. If Korea adopts MDP, I suggest the followings. First, discussions in Korea on MDP should be mainly focused on business partnership between lawyers and paralegals. Second, MDP form should be allowed only to law firms. Third, non-lawyers can be partner of MDP. However, lawyer should have interests more than 50 % of the MDP. Fourth, articles for form change from the current law firm to MDP is needed. Fifth, Ministry of Justice should be the licensing authorities for MDP. Sixth, discipline of non-lawyer specialists of MDP may be done by other laws that control the non-lawyer specialists.
참고문헌 (10)
- George C. Nonna, "Towards a Reformed Conception of Multidisciplinary Practice", Clev. St. L. Rev, 56, pp.533~534 (2008)
- 이전오, "미국과 영국의 MDP 동향", 인권과 정의, (412), pp.7~27 (2010), 대한변호사협회
- 대한변협 정책조정실, "이종(異種) 자격사 간 동업 제도의 도입에 관한 소고", 대한변협신문, ~ (2010)
- Sydney M. Cone, "American lawyers fight over MDP rules", Euro. Law, pp.51~52 (2000)
- Paul D. Paton, "Symposium:The Economic Downturn and the Legal Profession: Multidisciplinary Practice Redux: Globalization, Core Values, and Reviving the MDP Debate in America", Fordham L. Rev, 78, pp.2193~ (2010)
- "Report To The House Of Delegates"[URL]
- 김용섭, "독일과 일본에서의 MDP 논의", 인권과 정의, (412), pp.28~47 (2010), 대한변호사협회
- 전문자격사 규제개혁의 필요성과 방향, "고영선", KDI, ~ (2010)
- "변호사들, 돈 되는 부동산시장 넘본다는데․․․", 조선일보, B3~ (2012)
- 최승재, "한국형 MDP의 도입 방향", 인권과 정의, (412), pp.48~84 (2010), 대한변호사협회
