본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스위치선하증권의 법적 성질과 효력에 관한 연구

A Study on the Legal Characteristic and Effect of Switch Bill of Lading

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The switch B/L is a substitute of bill of lading that may be issued by the carrier(or agent) in exchange for the original bill of lading to change the original terms of carriage contract. Goods can be resold and the discharge port can be changed to different port and sometimes the seller doesn’t wish the name of provider or the actual origin of the cargo to be known to the buyer. In that case, the holder of the original B/L like seller or consignee would often ask the carrier to issue switch B/L in exchange for the original B/L. The carrier should issue the switch B/L after collecting the original B/L of same cargo and the switch B/L needs to satisfy the requirements provided in relevant regulations to be effective. In some practical cases where the person who is not the carrier issues switch B/L after receiving the original. And sometimes the carrier issues the switch B/L without receiving the original B/L. In that case, the switch B/L issued by the perdon other that the carrier or without receiving the original B/L doesn’t have effect. Because such rules that carrier issue B/L and there be only one B/L on same cargo is mandatory. As switch B/L can be compared with house B/L which is issued by the person who is not actual carrier, there can be misunderstanding that a switch B/L could be issued by any person other than the original carrier. In spite that there are some similarities between switch B/L and house B/L in some points like the issuer other than actual carrier and the existence of 2 sets of B/L, it is evident that the house B/L should be issued by the contract carrier who is the legitimate issuer of B/L. The switch B/L which was issued by third party other than the carrier can not be effective as that B/L doesn’t satisfy the mandatory requirement of Commercial Law that only the carrier or the agent of carrier can issue B/L.

Abstract

The switch B/L is a substitute of bill of lading that may be issued by the carrier(or agent) in exchange for the original bill of lading to change the original terms of carriage contract. Goods can be resold and the discharge port can be changed to different port and sometimes the seller doesn’t wish the name of provider or the actual origin of the cargo to be known to the buyer. In that case, the holder of the original B/L like seller or consignee would often ask the carrier to issue switch B/L in exchange for the original B/L. The carrier should issue the switch B/L after collecting the original B/L of same cargo and the switch B/L needs to satisfy the requirements provided in relevant regulations to be effective. In some practical cases where the person who is not the carrier issues switch B/L after receiving the original. And sometimes the carrier issues the switch B/L without receiving the original B/L. In that case, the switch B/L issued by the perdon other that the carrier or without receiving the original B/L doesn’t have effect. Because such rules that carrier issue B/L and there be only one B/L on same cargo is mandatory. As switch B/L can be compared with house B/L which is issued by the person who is not actual carrier, there can be misunderstanding that a switch B/L could be issued by any person other than the original carrier. In spite that there are some similarities between switch B/L and house B/L in some points like the issuer other than actual carrier and the existence of 2 sets of B/L, it is evident that the house B/L should be issued by the contract carrier who is the legitimate issuer of B/L. The switch B/L which was issued by third party other than the carrier can not be effective as that B/L doesn’t satisfy the mandatory requirement of Commercial Law that only the carrier or the agent of carrier can issue B/L.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "대법원 1991. 12. 10 선고, 98다13211판결 참조", ~
  2. "동규정 제2조", ~
  3. 박세운, "스위치선하증권의 불법적 발행 관행에 따른 위험과 그 대책", 통상정보연구, 14(2), pp.389~409 (2012), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
  4. "대법원 2003. 10. 9 선고 2002다2249판결", ~
  5. 김인현, "해상법", pp.253~ (2011), 법문사
  6. 최종현, "해상법상론" (2009), 박영사
  7. 정경영, "상법학강의" (2009), 박영사
  8. "서울중앙지법, 2013.8.23. 선고 2012가합516056 판결", ~
  9. "대법원 2003. 1. 10. 선고 2000다70064 판결", ~
  10. "대법원 1997. 7. 25. 선고 97다19656 판결", ~
  11. Thomas J.Schoenbaum, "Admiralty and Maritime Law", pp.551~ (2004), Thomson West
  12. 김인현, "실무에서 나타나는 다양한 선하증권과 그 대용물", 국제거래법연구, 22(1), pp.259~283 (2013), 국제거래법학회
  13. "대법원 1989. 3. 14. 선고 87다카1791판결", ~
  14. "대법원 1992.2.25. 선고 91다30026 판결", ~
  15. "대법원 2009. 10. 15. 선고 2009다39820판결", ~
  16. "SGCA 42(Singapore)", ~ (2005)
  17. "3 SLR 611", ~ (2003)
  18. "SGHC 111", ~ (2003)
  19. 1 SLR 295, , 2003
  20. "싱가포르 선하증권법 제5조", ~
  21. 1 Lloyd’s Rep 642 at 644, , 1996
  22. NSWSC 900, , 2001
  23. UNCITRAL, "Draft rpovisions on electronic transferable records", A, WG.Ⅳ, pp.WP.124[DOI]
  24. 김창준, "복합운송주선업자의 법적 지위에 관한 연구 : 법해석론적 쟁점을 중심으로", 박사, 상사법, pp.2004
  25. 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제14판)", pp.942~ (2012), 박영사
  26. "Singapore Law" (2011)[URL]
  27. "Switched Bills of Lading"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)