한ㆍ일과거사 청산과 이행기 정의(transitional justice) 개념의 적용
Introduction of Transitional Justice Model for the Settlement of History Disputes between Korea and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to conventional wisdom, the age of empire is over, and the global community exists now in an era of post-colonialism characterized in part by a peaceful relationship of nation-sates and peoples. However, this view is grounded in a wishful historicism. It might be more accurate to say that remnants of colonialism still exist social, political and economic relationships, especially in the current period between Korean and Japanese because of the war crimes of Japan during the World War Ⅱ. The intent of this article is to provide a quasi-judicial institution, the truth commission of two-state parties, on the basis of transitional justice. This kind of hybrid tribunals may offer real potential as a means to facilitate recovery from national feud between Korea and Japan based on the grave violation of human rights such as an act of sexual slavery toward Korean women by Japanese army before and during World War Ⅱ. This argument proceeds in part two with a evolution of the notion of transitional justice and its grounds of legal philosophy. Part three describes the limits of Tokyo International Military Tribunal for the realization of justice. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal failed to throughly address Japanese war crimes in terms of the failure of punishment of the Japanese King Hirohito. As a conclusion, this article suggests to introduce the Truth and Reconciliation Commission between Korea and Japan for the Japanese War Crimes(TRC Korea-Japan) as a transitional justice mechanism. The TRC Korea-Japan will contributes to rebuild the relationship between the two countries and can offer victims the opportunity to share their experience during the war and to recognize the accountability of war crimes toward Japanese Government. This kind of hybrid tribunal has been preceeded by East Timor and Indonesia as a form of the Commission of Truth and Friendship Indonesia-Timor-Leste.
Abstract
According to conventional wisdom, the age of empire is over, and the global community exists now in an era of post-colonialism characterized in part by a peaceful relationship of nation-sates and peoples. However, this view is grounded in a wishful historicism. It might be more accurate to say that remnants of colonialism still exist social, political and economic relationships, especially in the current period between Korean and Japanese because of the war crimes of Japan during the World War Ⅱ. The intent of this article is to provide a quasi-judicial institution, the truth commission of two-state parties, on the basis of transitional justice. This kind of hybrid tribunals may offer real potential as a means to facilitate recovery from national feud between Korea and Japan based on the grave violation of human rights such as an act of sexual slavery toward Korean women by Japanese army before and during World War Ⅱ. This argument proceeds in part two with a evolution of the notion of transitional justice and its grounds of legal philosophy. Part three describes the limits of Tokyo International Military Tribunal for the realization of justice. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal failed to throughly address Japanese war crimes in terms of the failure of punishment of the Japanese King Hirohito. As a conclusion, this article suggests to introduce the Truth and Reconciliation Commission between Korea and Japan for the Japanese War Crimes(TRC Korea-Japan) as a transitional justice mechanism. The TRC Korea-Japan will contributes to rebuild the relationship between the two countries and can offer victims the opportunity to share their experience during the war and to recognize the accountability of war crimes toward Japanese Government. This kind of hybrid tribunal has been preceeded by East Timor and Indonesia as a form of the Commission of Truth and Friendship Indonesia-Timor-Leste.
참고문헌 (28)
- Cesare P. R. Romano, "Can You Here Me Now? The Case for Extending the International Judical Network", Chicago Journal of International Law, 10, pp.240~ (2009)
- David M. Crane, ""Back to the Future"-Reflections on the Beginning of the Beginning : International Criminal Law in the Twenty-First Century", Fordham International Law Journal, 32 (2009)
- Geoffrey Robertson, "Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice", pp.191~ (1999)
- H.L.A. Hart, "The Concept of Law", pp.89~96 (1951)
- Herbert P. Bix, "Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan", pp.617~618 (2000)
- Ingrid Detter, "International Criminal Law", pp.19~ (2001)
- Jamie Rowen, "Social Reality and Philosophical Ideals in Transitional Justice, Cardozo Public Law", Policy and Ethics Journal, 7, pp.96~ (2008)
- John W. Dower, "Embracing Defeat, Japan in the Wake of World War Ⅱ", pp.456~ (1999)
- Jon Elster, "Closing the Books: Transnational Justice in Historical Perspective", pp.1~ (2003)
- Joseph Raz, "The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality", pp.37~38 (2002)
- Kathryn Sikkink, "The Impact of Human Right Trials in Latin America", Journal Peace Research, 44 (2006)
- Kirsten Sellars, "인권, 그 위선의 역사", pp.115~ (2003)
- Larry Niksch, "Japanese Military's "Comfort Women" System", Congressional Report Service (2007)
- Marius B. Jansen, "The Making of Modern Japan" (2000)
- Onuma Yasuaki, "Japanese War Guilt and Postwar Responsibilities of Japan", Berkeley Journal of International Law, 20, pp.600~602 (2002)
- Philip R. Piccigallo, "The Japanese on Trial:Allied War Crimes Operation in the East, 1945-1951", pp.19~20 (1979)
- Priscilla B. Hayner, "Fifteen Truth Commissions-1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study", Human Rights Quarterly, 16, pp.604~ (1994)
- Priscilla B. Hayner, "Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity" (2001)
- Richard John Galvin, "The Case for a Japanese Truth Commission Covering World War Ⅱ Era Japanese War Crimes", Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11 (2003)
- Ruti Teitel, "Transitional Justice", pp.6~ (2000)
- Steven R. Ratner, "Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy", pp.155~ (2001), Oxford Univ. Press
- Velasquez Rodriguez Case, "Judgment of July 29, 1988, Inter-Am.Ct.H.R. (Ser. C) No. 4" (1988)
- Vincent Chetail, "Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon", pp.370~ (2009)
- "남경대학살(Rape of Nanking)"[URL]
- "마닐라 대학살(Manila Massacre)"[URL]
- "바탄 죽음의 행진(Bataan Death March)"[URL]
- 최철영, "강제동원 관련 한인(조선인)소송에 있어 개인배상청구권 연구", 동북아역사논총, (19), pp.233~271 (2008), 동북아역사재단
- 최철영, "식민지 청산과 이행기의 정의: 동티모르의 사례", 민주법학, (45), pp.47~79 (2011), 민주주의법학연구회