일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제에 관한 법적 검토 재고
A Legal Reappraisal on the Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ Issue
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Japanese military ‘comfort women’ issue is a serious ‘legal’ issue which should be resolved before the victims, who are in their 70’s or 80’s, breathe their last. The issue was raised by Korean women in the late 1980’s and has been discussed in the international communities. The legal conclusions are that those Japanese who had engaged in the Japanese ‘comfort women’ issue committed the international laws including the crime against humanity, and that they should be punished and Japan should apologize and make compensation to the victims. The Japanese government, however, did not accept its liability. So the victims raised lawsuits against Japan in Japan and the United States. Even though the lawsuits made the facts of injury clear and encouraged the movement of the enactment of a law on the issue, they all ended against the plaintiffs. There remains the last ‘legal’ resolution, that is the enactment of a law including the apology and compensation by the Japanese assembly. The Korean government should urge the Japanese government and assembly for the prompt enactment of the law.Key Words : Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’, Sexual Slavery, Legal Liability and Moral Liability, Righting the Wrongs of the Past
Abstract
The Japanese military ‘comfort women’ issue is a serious ‘legal’ issue which should be resolved before the victims, who are in their 70’s or 80’s, breathe their last. The issue was raised by Korean women in the late 1980’s and has been discussed in the international communities. The legal conclusions are that those Japanese who had engaged in the Japanese ‘comfort women’ issue committed the international laws including the crime against humanity, and that they should be punished and Japan should apologize and make compensation to the victims. The Japanese government, however, did not accept its liability. So the victims raised lawsuits against Japan in Japan and the United States. Even though the lawsuits made the facts of injury clear and encouraged the movement of the enactment of a law on the issue, they all ended against the plaintiffs. There remains the last ‘legal’ resolution, that is the enactment of a law including the apology and compensation by the Japanese assembly. The Korean government should urge the Japanese government and assembly for the prompt enactment of the law.Key Words : Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’, Sexual Slavery, Legal Liability and Moral Liability, Righting the Wrongs of the Past
참고문헌 (62)
- "‘위안부문제는 과거청산 아닌 인권문제’, 조선일보 1998.2.26 20:57", 조선일보[URL]
- 국무조정실, "보도자료 한일회담 문서공개 후속대책 관련 민관공동위원회 개최, 2005.8.26", ~ (2005)
- 이용수, "청구인(이용수 외 108명), 헌법소원심판청구서, 2006.7", ~ (2006)
- "피청구인(외교통상부장관), 변론요지서, 2009.3.5", ~ (2009)
- "慰安婦関係調査結果発表に関する河野内閣官房長官談話, 1993.8.4"[URL]
- "戦後50周年にあたり内閣総理大臣談話, 1995.8.15"[URL]
- "日韓共同宣言─21世紀に向けた新たな日韓パートナーシップ, 1998.10.8"[URL]
- "平成11年(ネ)第206號 損害賠償請求控訴事件 第12準備書面, 2003.9.19", ~ (2003)
- "内閣総理大臣談話, 2010.8.10"[URL]
- "戰時性的强制被害者問題の解決の促進に關する法律案"[URL]
- 日本参議院, "豫算委員会会議録第一九號, 1990.6.6", ~ (1990)
- 日本参議院, "豫算委員会会議録第三號, 1991.8.27", ~ (1991)
- 日本衆議院, "豫算委員会会議録第二號, 2006.10.5", ~ (2006)
- 山口地裁下関支部, "山口地裁下関支部 平成4年(ワ)349號等, 1998.4.27", ~ (1998)
- "広島高裁 平成10年(ネ)278號等, 2001.3.29", ~ (2001)
- "最高裁 平成15年(オ)1895號, 2004.11.29", ~ (2004)
- "Hwang Geum Joo v. Japan, 172 F.Supp.2d 52 (D.D.C.,2001)", ~ (2001)
- "Hwang Geum Joo v. Japan, 332 F.3d 679 (C.A.D.C.,2003)", ~ (2003)
- "Hwang Geum Joo v. Japan, 413 F.3d 45 (C.A.D.C.,2005)", ~ (2005)
- "Hwang Geum Joo v. Japan, 546 U.S. 1208, 126 S.Ct. 1418 (U.S.,2006)", ~ (2006)
- "UN Doc. E", CN. 4, 53, pp.Add. 1 (1996)[DOI]
- "UN Doc. E", CN.4, 1998, pp.13, Add. 1
- "한국정신대문제대책협의회의", 한국정신대문제대책협의회[URL]
- "新しい歷史敎科書をつくる会"[URL]
- "女性のためのアジア平和國民基金"[URL]
- 김명기, "정신대와 국제법" (1993), 법지사
- 일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제에 관한 국제사회의 동향, "김창록", 여성부, ~ (2003)
- 도츠카 에츠로, "위안부가 아니라 성노예이다" (2001), 소나무
- "한일 역사현안 관련 일본군 위안부 연구논저 목록(상, 하)", 동북아역사재단[URL]
- 재일조선인 ‘위안부’ 재판을 지원하는 모임, "나의 마음은 지지 않았다 - 재일조선인 ‘위안부’ 송신도의 투쟁 -(DVD)", ~ (2010)
- 정진성, "일본군 성노예제 - 일본군위안부문제의 실상과 그 해결을 위한 운동 -" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
- 2000년 일본군성노예전범 여성국제법정 보고서, "한국정신대문제대책협의회", 한국정신대문제대책협의회, ~ (2001)
- VAWW-NET Japan, "女性國際戰犯法廷の全記錄 , I·II" (2002), 凱風出版
- 高橋哲哉, "戦後責任論" (1999), 講談社
- 高橋哲哉, "歴史認識 論争" (2002), 作品社
- 吉見義明, "從軍慰安婦" (1995), 岩波書店
- 大島考一, "'慰安婦'への償いとは何か - '国民基金'を考える" (1996), 明石書店
- 大沼保昭, "'慰安婦'問題とは何だったのか - メディア․NGO․政府の功罪" (2007), 中央公論新社
- 大沼保昭, "'慰安婦'問題とアジア女性基金" (1998), 東信堂
- 大沼保昭, "慰安婦問題という問い" (2007), 勁草書房
- 申惠丰他, "戰後補償と國際人道法 - 個人の請求權をめぐって" (2005), 明石書店
- 戸塚悦朗, "日本が知らない戦争責任 - 日本軍｢慰安婦｣問題の真の解決へ向けて" (2008), 現代人文社
- 김창록, "일본군 ‘위안부’문제의 법적 해결을 위한 하나의 모색 - 시모노세키판결을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (167) (1998)
- 김창록, "한일관계와 과거청산 - 한일 신파트너십’을 실마리로 -", 國際地域問題硏究, 17(1) (1999), 부산대
- 김창록, "한일간 과거청산에 있어서의 국가의 논리와 개인의 권리", 법사학연구, (30), pp.233~254 (2004), 한국법사학회
- 김창록, "일본에서의 대일과거청산소송", 법사학연구, (35), pp.329~402 (2007), 한국법사학회
- 김창록, "일본군 ‘위안부’ 헌법소원", 법학논고, (31), pp.337~368 (2009), 법학연구원
- 박재영, "독일의 과거극복, 어디까지 왔나? - “기억·책임·미래 재단”을 중심으로", 동학연구, (26), pp.115~140 (2009), 한국동학학회
- 송충기, "독일의 뒤늦은 과거청산: 나치하 외국인 강제노역자에 대한 보상을 중심으로", 역사비평, (73), pp.271~293 (2005), 역사문제연구소
- 양현아, "증언과 역사쓰기 - 한국인 ‘군위안부’의 주체성 재현. in: 근대를 다시 읽는다 2" (2006), 역사비평사
- 조시현, "2000년 일본군 성노예전범 여성국제법정과 일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제에 대한 새로운 이해의 가능성. in: 한일간 역사현안의 국제법적 재조명" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 양현아, "2000년법정을 통해 본 피해자 증언과 법 언어의 만남. in: 한일간 역사현안의 국제법적 재조명" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 최태현, "미국에서의 일본군 위안부 관련 소송 연구. in: 한일간 역사현안의 국제법적 재조명" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 한우성, "끝나지 않은 전쟁 - 미국에서 진행중인 ‘일본군위안부’ 및 징용 소송에 대한 보고서 -", 당대비평, 13 (2000)
- 高橋哲哉, "二〇一〇年の戦後責任論─｢応答の失敗｣からの再出発", 世界, 800 (2010)
- 金昌祿, "日本軍｢慰安婦｣訴訟と日本の裁判所の課題. in: 日韓の相互理解と戦後補償" (2002), 日本評論社
- 阿部浩己, "戦後責任と和解の模索. in: 20世紀の中のアジア·太平洋戦争" (2006), 岩波書店
- 花房俊雄, "慰安婦｣問題に劃期的判決. in: 関釜裁判判決文全文" (1998)
- Christopher P. Meade, "From Shanghai to Globocourt: An Analysis of the ‘Comfort Women's’ Defeat in Hwang v. Japan", Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 35 (2002)
- Jennifer Kwon, "The Comfort Women Litigation and the San Francisco Treaty: Adopting a Different Principle of Treaty Interpretation", George Washington Law Review, 73 (2005)