기억의 정치와 ‘법을 통한 과거청산’ 담론 비판
Politics of Memory and the Critical Analysis of Legal Discourse on Truth and Reconciliation
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Restoring transitional justice would refer to a range of approaches to address human rights violations of the past, to repair fractured justice system, to mourn and memorialize historical wounds, and to make legal compensation to the victims. At times of political transition, transitional justice would provide opportunities for the societies to address past human rights abuses, mass atrocities, or other forms of trauma in order to facilitate a smooth transition into more peaceful future. In case of Korean society the list would include i)coercive migration policies, military draft, and comfort women during Japanese occupation, ii)Jeju April 3 Massacre of post colonial period, iii) civilian massacres and rapes including Nogunri Massarcre during Korean War, and iv) fabricated espionage charges, tortures, suspicious deaths, and civil massacres under military dictatorship. In political aspect, memory is the very process of power dispute between the official memory and the suppressed memories, where the suppressed past would fight to be recognized as history by banding together with other oppressed memories to form collective memory. The politics of memory focus at micro-power relations between various political interests that get involved into the making process of collective memory and transitional justice. Critical assertion that this article is trying to make regarding legal discourse of truth and reconciliation is that, such power relations may be perceived not only at the level of suppressing counter memories, but also at the very process of restoring and normalizing those suppressed voices, of adapting them into official history. Thus this article starts with the deconstruction of the notion of restorative justice, through critical analysis on the intentional blurring between absence and loss, which underlies the presumption that we may recover justice of the past and represent existent wounds. Moreover it tries to illustrate how the project of legal compensation leads to normalization, exclusive inclusion, and commodification of counter memories. By doing so, ideological strategy of nation state behind legal discourse of truth and reconciliation may be revealed.
Abstract
Restoring transitional justice would refer to a range of approaches to address human rights violations of the past, to repair fractured justice system, to mourn and memorialize historical wounds, and to make legal compensation to the victims. At times of political transition, transitional justice would provide opportunities for the societies to address past human rights abuses, mass atrocities, or other forms of trauma in order to facilitate a smooth transition into more peaceful future. In case of Korean society the list would include i)coercive migration policies, military draft, and comfort women during Japanese occupation, ii)Jeju April 3 Massacre of post colonial period, iii) civilian massacres and rapes including Nogunri Massarcre during Korean War, and iv) fabricated espionage charges, tortures, suspicious deaths, and civil massacres under military dictatorship. In political aspect, memory is the very process of power dispute between the official memory and the suppressed memories, where the suppressed past would fight to be recognized as history by banding together with other oppressed memories to form collective memory. The politics of memory focus at micro-power relations between various political interests that get involved into the making process of collective memory and transitional justice. Critical assertion that this article is trying to make regarding legal discourse of truth and reconciliation is that, such power relations may be perceived not only at the level of suppressing counter memories, but also at the very process of restoring and normalizing those suppressed voices, of adapting them into official history. Thus this article starts with the deconstruction of the notion of restorative justice, through critical analysis on the intentional blurring between absence and loss, which underlies the presumption that we may recover justice of the past and represent existent wounds. Moreover it tries to illustrate how the project of legal compensation leads to normalization, exclusive inclusion, and commodification of counter memories. By doing so, ideological strategy of nation state behind legal discourse of truth and reconciliation may be revealed.
참고문헌 (57)
- 고병권, "니체,천 개의 눈 천 개의 길" (2004), 소명출판사
- 권명아, "식민지 이후를 사유하다:탈식민화와 재식민화의 경계" (2009), 책세상
- 권오헌, "역사적 인물의 영웅화와 기념의 문화정치:1960~1970년대를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2010
- 시칠리아의 암소, "폭력의 구조", pp.1999, 김 현
- 백승욱, "중국노동자의 기억의 정치" (2007), 폴리테이아
- 이경훈, "오빠의 탄생:한국근대문학의 풍속사" (2003), 문학과지성사
- 이진경, "역사의 공간:소수성,타자성,외부성의 사건적 사유" (2010), 휴머니스트
- 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말한다" (2005), 휴머니스트
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회 2000년 일본군 성노예 전범 여성국제법정 한국위원회 증언팀, "기억으로 다시 쓰는 역사" (2001), 풀빛
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회 부설 전쟁과여성인권센터 연구팀, "역사를 만드는 이야기: 일본군 ‘위안부’ 여성들의 경험과 기억", 여성과인권, ~ (2004)
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회, "강제로 끌려간 조선인 군위안부들 3" (1999), 한울
- 김성례, "여성주의 구술사의 방법론적 성찰", 한국문화인류학, 35(2) (2002), 한국문화인류학회
- 김영범, "집단기억의 사회사적 지평과 동학 In 사회사연구의 이론과 실제", 한국정신문화연구원, ~ (1998)
- 김 원, "서발턴은 침묵하는가?-구술,기억,그리고 재현을 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 17 (2009)
- 김현숙, "경합 중인 과거와 열린 미래 - ＂진실＂ ＂정의＂ ＂화해＂에 관하여", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (61), pp.2~85 (2002), 한국사회사학회
- 심영희, "침묵에서 증언으로:‘군위안부’ 피해자들의 귀국 이후의 삶을 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 23(2)
- 양현아, "증언을 통해 본 한국인 ‘군위안부’들의 포스트식민의 상흔(Trauma)", 한국여성학, 22(3), pp.133~167 (2006), 한국여성학회
- 양현아, "피해 증언의 생산과 ‘과거 청산’: ‘수지 김’ 유족 증언을 중심으로", 민주법학, (33), pp.135~170 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회
- 양현아, "한국가족법에서 읽은 세가지 문제 In 가족과 법제의 사회사" (1995), 문학과지성사
- 이재승, "이행기의 정의", 법과사회, 22, pp.47~74 (2002), 법과사회이론학회
- 이재승, "과거청산과 인권", 민주법학, 24, pp.1~42 (2003), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이재승, "이행기의 정의", 법과사회, 22, pp.47~74 (2002), 법과사회이론학회
- 이철우, "법사회사 연구의 한 방법:일제하 순천지역 연구의 경험", 법사학연구, (17) (1996)
- 임옥희, "국가 페미니즘화와 개혁의 딜레마", 당대비평, (27) (2003)
- 임지현, "`근대`의 담 밖에서 역사 읽기 In 21세기의 한국사학" (2000), 국사편찬위원회
- 장세룡, "로컬 기억과 기억의 정치-폴란드 에드바브네 유대인 학살 기억의 사례-", 대구사학, 98, pp.243~281 (2010), 대구사학회
- 전진성, "트라우마, 내러티브, 정체성－ 20세기 전쟁 기념의 문화사적 연구를 위한 방법론의 모색 －", 역사학보, (193), pp.217~243 (2007), 역사학회
- 정근식, "과거 청산의 역사사회학을 위하여 - 한국의 민주화와 관련하여", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (61), pp.1~52 (2002), 한국사회사학회
- 정근식, "지역정체성과 상징정치", 경제와 사회, (30) (1996)
- 정혜욱, "섭얼턴에서 행위력을 보유한 주체로", 여성학연구, 17(1) (2007)
- 정혜욱, "스피박과 여성", 여성학연구, 18 (2008)
- 정호기, "국가폭력과 피해자 보상－‘5.18민중항쟁’의 인적 피해보상 제도를 중심으로－", 민주주의와 인권, 6(1), pp.113~146 (2006), 5.18연구소
- 정호기, "한국 과거청산의 성과와 전망 - 과거청산 관련 국가기구의 활동을 중심으로", 역사비평, (69), pp.238~261 (2004), 역사문제연구소
- 최정기, "과거청산에서의 기억 전쟁과 이행기 정의의 난점들- 광주민주화운동 관련 보상과 피해자의 트라우마를 중심으로", 지역사회연구, 14(2), pp.3~22 (2006), 한국지역사회학회
- 한건수, "경합하는 역사: 사회적 기억과 차이의 정치학", 한국문화인류학, 35(2) (2002), 한국문화인류학회
- Anderson,B, "상상의 공동체(Imagined Communities)" (2004), 나남
- Assmann,A, "기억의 공간(Erinnerungsräume)" (1999), 경북대학교 출판부
- Braudel,F, "지중해의 기억(Mediterranean)" (2006), 한길사
- Butler,J, "안티고네의 주장(Antigone's Claim)" (2005), 동문선
- Foucault,M, "사회를 보호해야 한다-1976,콜레주 드 프랑스에서의 강의(Il faut defendre la societe:cours au college de france,1976)" (1998), 동문선
- Iggers,G, "20세기 사학사(Historiography in the 20th Century)" (1999), 푸른역사
- LaCapra, D, "현대유럽지성사 (Modern European Intellectual History)" (1986), 강원대학교 출판부
- LaCapra, D., "Representing Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma" (1994), Cornell University Press
- McClintock,A, "Imperial Leather" (1995), Routledge
- "The Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity" (2004), Macmillan Reference USA
- Assmann,J, "Collective Memory and Cultural Identity", New German Critique, (65) (1995)
- Bernstein, R., "The Culture of Memory", History and Theory, 43(4)
- Captain, E., "네덜란드령 동인도제도에서의 성매매 강요와 전후 네덜란드에서 생존자들의 목소리(Forced Prostitution in the Dutch East Indies Then and Post-War Voices of Survivors in the Netherlands Now)" (2007), 군위안부 문제 연구에 대한 검토와 과제
- Chatterjee, P, "The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History" (1990), Rutgers University Press
- Kirsch,J, "Trauer und historische Erinnerung in der Berliner Republik, Überlengungen aus Anlaß der Mahnmalsdebatte" (2001), Trauer und Geschichte, Böhlau
- LaCapra,D, "History and Memory:In the Shadow of Holocaust" (1998), Cornell University Press
- LaCapra,D, "Trauma,Absence,Loss" (1999), Critical Inquiry
- LaCapra,D, "역사 쓰기, 트라우마 쓰기(Writing History, Writing Trauma) In 치유의 역사학으로: 라카프라의 정신분석학적 역사학" (2008), 푸른역사
- Nerone,J, "Professional History and Social Memory", Communication, 11 (1989)
- Popular Memory Group, "Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Methods In Making History: Studies in History Writing and Politics" (1982), University of Minnesota Press
- Schwartz,B, "The Social Context of Commemoration:A Study in Collective Memory", Social Forces, 61 (1982)
- Sturken,M, "Narratives and Recovery: Repressed Memory as Cultural Memory In of Memory: Cultural Recall In the Present" (1998), Dartmouth