영미법에서의 대리권 발생에 관한 약간의 고찰
Agency System in Anglo-American Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The words are derived from the Latin verb, agens, agentis. The purpose of the rules of agency is to accomplish results by utilizing the services of others. The basic theory of the agency device is to enable a person, through the services of another, to broaden the scope of his activities. Agency is well established not only in German law but also in English-American law. However, these two legal systems have developed creation of an agency differently. The American Law Institute's Restatement(Third) of Agency describes the creation of an agency relationship. Agency law is therefore fundamentallly concerned with whether particular kinds of relationships qualify as agency relationships. The creation of an agency relationship necessarily involves two steps: manifestation by the principal and consent by the agent. For example, must both parties subjectively consent to the relationship? Must they intend to create the legal relationship? Must the agent be promised contract-like consideration by the principal? The law of agency must therefore determine under what circumstances an agency relationship exist. When an agency relationship involves the arrangement making function, it is essential that third parties be able to enforce against the principal commitments made by the agent. Perhaps the most important consequence of the agency is the agent's power to bind the principal to third parties and to bind third parties to the principal.
Abstract
The words are derived from the Latin verb, agens, agentis. The purpose of the rules of agency is to accomplish results by utilizing the services of others. The basic theory of the agency device is to enable a person, through the services of another, to broaden the scope of his activities. Agency is well established not only in German law but also in English-American law. However, these two legal systems have developed creation of an agency differently. The American Law Institute's Restatement(Third) of Agency describes the creation of an agency relationship. Agency law is therefore fundamentallly concerned with whether particular kinds of relationships qualify as agency relationships. The creation of an agency relationship necessarily involves two steps: manifestation by the principal and consent by the agent. For example, must both parties subjectively consent to the relationship? Must they intend to create the legal relationship? Must the agent be promised contract-like consideration by the principal? The law of agency must therefore determine under what circumstances an agency relationship exist. When an agency relationship involves the arrangement making function, it is essential that third parties be able to enforce against the principal commitments made by the agent. Perhaps the most important consequence of the agency is the agent's power to bind the principal to third parties and to bind third parties to the principal.
참고문헌 (16)
- "Cheshire and Fifoot's, Law of contract", pp.421~ (1981), London Butterworths
- Daniel S. Kleinberger, "Agency, Partnerships, and LLCs", pp.6~ (2008), Wolters Kluwer
- G.H.L. Fridman, "The Law of Agency", pp.8~ (1971), London Butterworths
- Henry Campbell Black, "Black's law dictionary", pp.625~ (1990), West Publishing Co
- J.Dennis Hynes, "Agency, Partnership, and The LLC", pp.2008, Thomson
- Raphael Powell, "The law of agency, Sir Isaac", pp.36~ (1961), Pitman & Sons Ltd
- Roderick Munday, "Agency(Law and Principles)", pp.35~ (2010), Oxford University Press
- Stoljar, "The law of agency", pp.267~ (1961), Sweet & Maxwell
- Warren A. Seavey, "The rationale of agency", Yale L. J, 29, pp.859~ (1920)
- William A. Gregory, "The law of agency and partnership", pp.34~ (2001), Westgroup
- 가정준, "영미법상의 consideration법리", 비교법학연구, 2, pp.1~ (2003), 한국비교법학회
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅲ)", pp.29~ (2007), 박영사
- 박기령, "수임자의무(Fiduciary Duty)에 대한 영미법의 해석론 비교연구", 법학논집, 13(3), pp.57~91 (2009), 법학연구소
- 엄동섭, "미국계약법Ⅰ", pp.53~
- 이호정, "영국계약법", pp.43~ (2003), 경문사
- 장근영, "영미법상 신인의무 법리와 이사의 지위", 비교사법, 15(1), pp.269~302 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
