배상명령제도의 활성화방안
A Study on the Activation Plans of the Restitution System
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to devise activation plans for the restitution system. For that purpose, the study identified problems with the system, explored improvement measures, and proposed a system required for its activation. Problems with the restitution system were approached in three areas, which include problems with the crimes subject to restitution, those with the scope of compensation for damages, and those with the regulations to restrict restitution. First, it is reasonable to set the crimes subject to restitution as certain rights rather than the current limited enumeration method. Secondly, the scope of compensation for damages should include loss profit and funeral costs. In addition, a set of criteria should be set for estimation of consolation money. Finally, the current Article 25, Clause 3 of Special Act on Lawsuit Facilitation lists a group of cases that allow the court to give a restitution judgment. However, the provision is too abstract and serves as a ground provision for the judge not to give a restitution judgment according to his or her conclusion. The study thus proposed improvement measures on the regulations to restrict restitution. The study also proposed five systems required for the activation of the restitution system as follows:First, a regulation to make it mandatory for the defendant to report his or her property should be introduced in order to guarantee the effectiveness of restitution. Second, a regulation to make restitution based on authority mandatory should be introduced. The regulation allows the court to give a restitution judgment based on its authority in case that the intention of the defendant is likely to be suppressed or restricted by the plaintiff or the offender or it is difficult to expect normal judgment from the defendant. Third, the prosecutor's obligation to give a notice of compensation application in the current Special Act on Lawsuit Facilitation should be expanded to his or her obligation for explanation or cooperation. Fourth, the discovery system should be expanded, as well. Fifth, the attorney of crime victim system should be introduced to help the victim in independent status from the defendant or investigation agency in the criminal procedure.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to devise activation plans for the restitution system. For that purpose, the study identified problems with the system, explored improvement measures, and proposed a system required for its activation. Problems with the restitution system were approached in three areas, which include problems with the crimes subject to restitution, those with the scope of compensation for damages, and those with the regulations to restrict restitution. First, it is reasonable to set the crimes subject to restitution as certain rights rather than the current limited enumeration method. Secondly, the scope of compensation for damages should include loss profit and funeral costs. In addition, a set of criteria should be set for estimation of consolation money. Finally, the current Article 25, Clause 3 of Special Act on Lawsuit Facilitation lists a group of cases that allow the court to give a restitution judgment. However, the provision is too abstract and serves as a ground provision for the judge not to give a restitution judgment according to his or her conclusion. The study thus proposed improvement measures on the regulations to restrict restitution. The study also proposed five systems required for the activation of the restitution system as follows:First, a regulation to make it mandatory for the defendant to report his or her property should be introduced in order to guarantee the effectiveness of restitution. Second, a regulation to make restitution based on authority mandatory should be introduced. The regulation allows the court to give a restitution judgment based on its authority in case that the intention of the defendant is likely to be suppressed or restricted by the plaintiff or the offender or it is difficult to expect normal judgment from the defendant. Third, the prosecutor's obligation to give a notice of compensation application in the current Special Act on Lawsuit Facilitation should be expanded to his or her obligation for explanation or cooperation. Fourth, the discovery system should be expanded, as well. Fifth, the attorney of crime victim system should be introduced to help the victim in independent status from the defendant or investigation agency in the criminal procedure.
참고문헌 (15)
- 이천현, "범죄피해의 신속한 회복: 배상명령제도", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.1145~1163 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이재상, "배상명령절차" (1991), 고시계
- 大谷實, "刑事政策講義-各種犯罪者とその處遇", pp.345~ (2009), 弘文堂
- 홍태석, "일본에 있어서 범죄피해자에 대한 손해회복과 손해배상명령제도", 피해자학연구, 16(2), pp.219~240 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 이재영, "가정·학교·지역사회 사회자본과 청소년 일탈행동", 사회과학연구, 17(3), pp.61~82 (2010), 사회과학연구원
- 노도균, "한국의 범죄피해자구조법과 일미의 범죄피해자보상제도에 관한 소고", pp.44~45 (2006), 법무연수원
- 김용세, "피해자학", pp.207~ (2003), 형설출판사
- 송기오, "범죄피해자 보호 및 지원제도", pp.167~ (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이재상, "형사절차에서의 피해자보호", 피해자학연구, (창간호), pp.46~ (1992)
- Madlener, "Neue Wege", pp.24~ (1990)
- 이재상, "신형사소송법(제2판)", pp.127~ (2011), 박영사
- 박광민, "형사절차상 피해자보호의 현황과 전망", 경성법학, 14(1), pp.25~ (2005)
- "조선일보"[URL]
- 박광섭, "개정 형사소송법상 피해자보호에 관한 규정의 평가와 향후 입법과제", 106~
- 박광섭, "범죄피해자 보호를 위한 입법론적 검토", (11), pp.169~ (2000)
