한ㆍ일어 이중주격론의 대조 분석 - 三上 章설을 중심으로 -
A Comparative Analysis on the 'Double-Subject' in Korean and Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Research in contrastive linguistics is noteworthy as it provides valuable observations that can be applied in foreign language education and as it allows shared theories attested in the languages under comparison. The current study compares the various accounts for the double-subject construction, which has received much attention in Korean and Japanese linguistics, and attempts to reveal their fundamentals. The existing theories on the phenomenon in the two languages have so far been overall compatible in terms of macro-micro subject theory, predicate clause theory, and topicalization theory. Nevertheless, the current paper offers critiques on ‘additional/vicarious function’(‘兼務’/‘代行’) that Mikami(三上) defended in 「zou-wa hana-ga nagai(象は鼻が長い)」. Additional/ vicarious function of topic marker {wa}(nun) argues that the nominative, accusative, locative, dative, and genitive case markers have. However, this is a misinterpretation caused from the omission of the case marker that follow {wa}(nun) as a result of topicalization. Topic markers cannot be argued to substitute the roles of other case markers.
Abstract
Research in contrastive linguistics is noteworthy as it provides valuable observations that can be applied in foreign language education and as it allows shared theories attested in the languages under comparison. The current study compares the various accounts for the double-subject construction, which has received much attention in Korean and Japanese linguistics, and attempts to reveal their fundamentals. The existing theories on the phenomenon in the two languages have so far been overall compatible in terms of macro-micro subject theory, predicate clause theory, and topicalization theory. Nevertheless, the current paper offers critiques on ‘additional/vicarious function’(‘兼務’/‘代行’) that Mikami(三上) defended in 「zou-wa hana-ga nagai(象は鼻が長い)」. Additional/ vicarious function of topic marker {wa}(nun) argues that the nominative, accusative, locative, dative, and genitive case markers have. However, this is a misinterpretation caused from the omission of the case marker that follow {wa}(nun) as a result of topicalization. Topic markers cannot be argued to substitute the roles of other case markers.
참고문헌 (52)
- 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색", pp.12~33 (1988), 탑출판사
- 남기심, "그림씨를 풀이말로 하는 문장의 몇 가지 특질", 한글, (142), pp.103~127 (1968), 한글학회
- 박순함, "‘격문법’에 입각한 국어의 겹주어에 관한 고찰", 어학연구, 4(2), pp.11~31 (1970), 서울대
- 박승빈, "조선어학", 歷文, (1), pp.50~ (1935), 조선어학연구회
- 서정수, "국어의 이중주어 문법", 국어국문학, (52), pp.169~195 (1971), 국어국
- 서정수, "수정 증보 국어문법", pp.170~181 (1996), 한양대 출판원
- 성광수, "국어 주어 및 목적어의 중출현상에 대하여", 문법연구, 1, pp.219~225 (1974), 문법연구회
- 송석중, "Some Transformation Rules in Korean", 박사, pp.1967
- 유길준, "대한문전", 歷文, (1) (1909), 융문관
- 임홍빈, "국어의 주제화 연구", 국어연구, (28), pp.3~100 (1972), 서울대 국어연구회
- 임홍빈, "주격중출론을 찾아서", 문법연구, 1, pp.113~146 (1974), 문법연구회
- 정인상, "주어 in : 국어연구 어디까지 왔나?", pp.241~247 (1990), 서울대 대학원 국어연구회
- 주시경, "국어문법", 歷文, (1), pp.11~ (1910), 박문서관
- 주시경, "조선어문법", 歷文, (1), pp.12~ (1913), 박문서관
- 최현배, "우리말본", 歷文, (1), pp.47~ (1937), 연희전문 출판부
- 홍기문, "조선문법연구", 歷文, (1), pp.39~ (1947), 서울신문사
- 홍사만, "現代韓國語の特殊助詞の硏究, -日本語の副助詞との對比を中心に-", 박사, 文藝ㆍ言語學系, pp.1989
- 홍사만, "日本語の副助詞における格との無関係性の硏究", 島根県立国際短期大学紀要, 7, pp.27~53 (2000), 島根県立国際短期大学
- 홍사만, "국어 어휘의미의 사적 변천", pp.82~89 (2003), 한국문화사
- 홍사만, "韓日言語對照分析の一端 in : 東アジア言語ㆍ文化の比較", 北海道大學大學院文學硏究科 國際シンポジウム, pp.77~101 (2009)
- 홍사만, "한국어와 외국어 대조분석론", pp.54~56 (2009), 도서출판 역락
- 靑木伶子, "現代語助詞｢は｣の構文論的硏究" (1992), 笠間書院
- 安藤貞雄, "英語の論理ㆍ日本語の論理, -對照言語學的硏究-", pp.145~159 (1990), 大修館書店
- 大久保忠利, "日本文法陳述論", pp.109~152 (1968), 明治書院
- 大久保忠利, "日本文法の心理と論理", pp.187~203 (1974), 國土社
- 大久保忠利, "‘ぞうハはなガ長い’という文の常識", 新日本語講座, 2, pp.3~15 (1975), 汎文社
- 尾上圭介, "提題論の遺産", 言語, 6, pp.20~29 (1977), 大修館書店
- 尾上圭介, "助詞“は”硏究史に於ける意味と文法 in : 神戶大學文學部30周年紀念論文集" (1979)
- 菊地康人, "“は”構文の槪觀 in : 日本語の主題と取り立て", pp.37~47 (1995), くろしお出版
- 久野 暲, "日本文法硏究", pp.27~47 (1973), 大修館書店
- 久野 暲, "日本語の主語の特殊性", 言語, 6, pp.15~16 (1977), 大修館書店
- 北原保雄, "日本文法事典", pp.282~283 (1981), 有精堂
- 北原保雄, "日本語文法の焦點", pp.76, 102~89, 105 (1984), 敎育出版
- 阪田雪子, "“ハ”と“ガ”はどう違う?", 新日本語講座, 2, pp.127~138 (1975), 汎文社
- 柴谷方良, "日本語の分析", pp.185~216 (1978), 大修館書店
- 衫本 武, "大主語構文と總記の解釋 in : 日本語の主題と取り立て", pp.81~102 (1995), くろしお出版
- 橋本萬太郞, "總主語ㆍ小主語の統辭法", 國語學, (74), pp.12~22 (1968), 國語學會
- 堀口和吉, "“∼は∼”のはなし", pp.75~83 (1995), ひつじ書房
- 野田尙史, "文階層構造からみた主題 in : 日本語の主題と取り立て", pp.1, 20~ (1995), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "日本語の主題と取り立て" (1995), くろしお出版
- 松下大三郞, "改撰標準日本文法", pp.711, 772~716, 781 (1974), 勉誠社
- 松村 明, "日本文法大辭典", pp.320, 395~ (1971), 明治書院
- 三上 章, "象は鼻が長い", pp.8~129 (1960), くろしお出版
- 三上 章, "日本語の論理 -ハとガ-", pp.224~234 (1963), くろしお出版
- 三上 章, "文法敎育の革新", pp.97~121 (1963), くろしお出版
- 三上 章, "文法小論集", pp.125~143 (1974), くろしお出版
- 村田美穗子, "助辭“は”のすべて", pp.12, 23~92 (1998), 至文堂
- 山田 光, "象は鼻が長い", 言語, 6, pp.2~8 (1977), 大修館書店
- Andrej, Bekeš, "文脈から見た主題化と“は” in : 日本語の主題と取り立て", pp.155~ (1995), くろしお出版
- Kuroda, S., "ガ、ヲ及びニについて", 國語學, (63), pp.75~85 (1965), 國語學會
- Kuroda, S., "Subject In : Japanese generative grammar(Syntax and Semantics 5)" (1976), Academic Press
- Li, Ch., "Subject and Topic", pp.483~ (1976)