1920년대 전반기 이광수 문학에 나타난 문화담론 연구 - 『개벽』과 『조선문단』을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Cultural Discourse of Lee Guang-Su's literature in 1920's first half year -focused on <Gaebyuk>(개벽) and <Chosunmundan>(조선문단)
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Aim of this dissertation 1920's Lee Guang-Su's cultural discussion leads and relation with the media is to try to observe the aspect which becomes known. This research 1920's his cultural discussion to kick from literary world and under to reveal meaning the possibility will be. 1920's <Gaebyuk> where is a central media was the space where forms a cultural discussion. <Chosunmundan> was the space where as literature practices a cultural discussion. In <Gaebyuk>, it insists on the revision through the direction in which it advances of the colony shipbuilding worker and culture through <the national reorganization argument>(민족개조론). And in <Chosunmundan>, it used as the space in which it practices the culture discussion with a novel and critique. His discourse was to educate elite audiences loaded in <Gaebyuk>. The discourse loaded in <Gaebyuk> was that it is for a communicaion with an audience. A novel and the critique loaded in <Chosunmundan> are to rally an audience. That is, <Chosunmundan> acted as the space in which it can practice his the culture discussion. After all, his the cultural discussion meaning can be obtained from the cross relation between <Gaebyuk> and <Chosunmundan>, that is a media, in 1920's. This is not planned in order to exclude the proletarian literature but it is the discussion formed in the direction finding process where the Chosun nation can go forward in the situation of in 1920's.
Abstract
Aim of this dissertation 1920's Lee Guang-Su's cultural discussion leads and relation with the media is to try to observe the aspect which becomes known. This research 1920's his cultural discussion to kick from literary world and under to reveal meaning the possibility will be. 1920's <Gaebyuk> where is a central media was the space where forms a cultural discussion. <Chosunmundan> was the space where as literature practices a cultural discussion. In <Gaebyuk>, it insists on the revision through the direction in which it advances of the colony shipbuilding worker and culture through <the national reorganization argument>(민족개조론). And in <Chosunmundan>, it used as the space in which it practices the culture discussion with a novel and critique. His discourse was to educate elite audiences loaded in <Gaebyuk>. The discourse loaded in <Gaebyuk> was that it is for a communicaion with an audience. A novel and the critique loaded in <Chosunmundan> are to rally an audience. That is, <Chosunmundan> acted as the space in which it can practice his the culture discussion. After all, his the cultural discussion meaning can be obtained from the cross relation between <Gaebyuk> and <Chosunmundan>, that is a media, in 1920's. This is not planned in order to exclude the proletarian literature but it is the discussion formed in the direction finding process where the Chosun nation can go forward in the situation of in 1920's.
참고문헌 (25)
- "개벽", ~
- "조선문단", ~
- 김경미, "이광수 문학에 나타난 민족주의 담론의 양가성 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 김동식, "한국의 근대적 문학 개념형성과정 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 金明久, "1920년대 국내 부르주아 민족운동 우파 계열의 민족운동론", 한국근현대사연구, 20, pp.163~196 (2002), 한국근현대사학회
- 김미형, "논설문 문체의 변천연구", 한말연구, (11), pp.23~71 (2002), 한말연구학회
- 김현주, "이광수의 문화이념 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 김현주, "논쟁의 정치와 <민족개조론>의 글쓰기", 역사와 현실, (57), pp.111~140 (2005), 한국역사연구회
- 김형국, "1920년대초 민족개조론 검토", 한국근현대사연구, (19), pp.187~206 (2001), 한국근현대사학회
- 박찬승, "한국 근대정치 사상사연구-민족주의 우파의 실력양성운동론" (1994), 역사비평사
- 박헌호, "同人誌에서 新春文藝로―등단제도의 권력적 변환", 대동문화연구, (53), pp.5~40 (2006), 대동문화연구원
- 방인근, "한국문단이면사" (1999), 깊은샘
- 이경돈, "『조선문단』의 재인식", 상허학보, (7), pp.61~101 (2001), 상허학회
- 이봉범, "1920년대 부르주아문학의 제도적 정착과 『조선문단』", 민족문학사연구, (29), pp.187~229 (2005), 민족문학사학회
- 조연현, "한국현대문학사 개관" (1989), 정음사
- 차혜영, "조선문단 연구-‘조선문학’의 창안과 문학 장 생산의 기제에 대하여", 한국문학이론과 비평, 10(3), pp.195~228 (2006), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 천정환, "주체로서의 근대적 대중독자의 형성과 전개", 독서연구, (13), pp.209~235 (2005), 한국독서학회
- 최수일, "1920년대 문학과 『개벽』의 위상", 박사, pp.2002
- 최수일, "『개벽』 유통망의 현황과 담당층", 대동문화연구, (49), pp.347~417 (2005), 대동문화연구원
- 최수일, "근대문학의 재생산 회로와 검열―<개벽>을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (53), pp.77~120 (2006), 대동문화연구원
- 한기형, "문화정치기 검열체제와 식민지 미디어", 대동문화연구, (51), pp.69~105 (2005), 대동문화연구원
- 한기형, "식민지 검열장의 성격과 근대 텍스트", 민족문학사연구, (34), pp.416~446 (2007), 민족문학사학회
- 허수, "일제하 이돈화의 사회사상과 천도교", 박사, pp.2005
- 許洙, "『개벽』의 ‘表象空間’에 나타난 매체적 성격 ―표지 및 목차 분석을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.353~390 (2008), 대동문화연구원
- 사이드, 에드워드, "문화와 제국주의" (1995), 창
