본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동기수준에 따른 맥락간섭 효과가 골프 칩샷 향상에 미치는 영향

The Benefit of Gradual Practice Condition in Contextual Interference for Golf Chip Shot Improvement by Motivation Level

김지수|권승민|홍석범|육동원
국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠과학원 (Korea Institute of Sport Science)|2008.09|체육과학연구 (Korean Journal of Sport Science)|제19권 제3호|pp. 106-116|DOI 10.24985/kjss.2008.19.3.106

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

맥락간섭효과동기수준motivation levelcontextual interference골프 칩샷 과제golf chip shot task
주제분류체육

초록

본 연구의 목적은 학습자의 동기수준에 따른 맥락간섭효과가 골프 칩샷 과제의 학습에 미치는 차별적인 영향을 밝혀내는데 있다. 본 연구의 대상은 총 54명의 중학교 남학생으로, 사전에 실시한 동기수준 검사를 통하여 고동기 그룹과 저동기 그룹(각각 분단 연습조건 그룹 9명, 무선 연습조건 그룹 9명, 점진적 연습조건 그룹 9명)에 각각 27명씩의 피험자가 무선으로 할당되었다. 본 연구에서 사용된 과제는 골프 칩샷 과제로서, 습득단계는 2(동기수준) × 3(연습조건) × 6(분단)으로, 즉각 파지검사 및 전이검사는 각각 2(동기수준) × 3(연습조건) × 3(분단)의 요인 설계 하에 이루어 졌다. 분석결과는 첫째, 습득단계에서는 고동기-점진적 연습 조건 그룹이 가장 우수한 수행을 한 것으로 나타났고, 동기수준에 따라서는 고동기 수준 그룹이 저동기 수준 그룹 보다 그리고 연습 조건에 따라서는 점진적 연습조건 그룹과 분단 연습조건 그룹이 무선 연습조건 그룹 보다 우수한 수행을 한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 즉각 파지검사에서 동기와 분단간의 상호작용효과에 따르면, 분단이 진행 될수록 고동기 수준 그룹이 저동기 수준 그룹보다 우수한 수행을 하였고, 동기수준에 따라 고동기 수준 그룹은 분단이 진행 될수록 유의한 수행점수가 나타났지만, 저동기 수준 그룹에서는 3분단의 수행만 1, 2분단과 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 그리고 연습조건은 점진적 연습조건 그룹이 분단과 무선 연습조건 그룹 보다, 무선 연습조건 그룹이 분단 연습조건 그룹 보다 우수한 수행을 한 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 전이검사에서는 즉각 파지검사의 주 효과 분석과 동일한 결과가 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 동기수준과 연습조건간의 상호작용효과를 설명하지는 못하였지만, 새로운 연습조건인 점진적 연습조건의 우수성을 밝혀주는 계기가 되는 것이라고 할 수 있겠다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine influence of contextual interference effect on students' golf chip shot learning and to provide more effective methods for teaching various students who have different level of motivation. The subjects were 54 middle school male students. According to the test of motivation level, 54 subjects randomly allocated to either a highly motivated group or a low motivated group(each 9 block practice condition students, 9 random practice condition students and 9 gradual practice conditions). The task used in this research was golf chip shot task. Before acquisition phase, all subjects participated in the pilot test. There were no differences in golf chip shot skill between six groups after analysing the data from pilot test. The experiment was carried out 2(motivation level) × 3(practice condition) × 6(block) factorial design with repeated measures on the last factor for acquisition test and 2 × 3 × 3 factorial design with repeated measures on last factor for retention and transfer test. The following results presented. First, the high motivated-gradual practice condition group did most effective performance in acquisition phase and high-motivated group was more effective than low-motivated group at motivation level. Moreover, gradual and block practice condition groups were more effective than random practice condition group. Second, according to immediately retention phase' interaction of motivation × blocks, high-motivated level group was more effective than low-motivated group and high-motivated level group displayed significant effect during acquisition phase. In main effect analysis, gradual practice condition group more effective than random and block practice condition group and random practice condition group more effective than block practice condition group. Finally transfer test also revealed that main effect analysis had same result with immediately retention phase. Even though this study showed that there was no interaction between motivation level and practice condition, the study revealed that gradual practice condition was most effective method to learn golf chip shot skill.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 박종태, "맥락간섭수준의 단계적 전환이 탁구의 세 가지 기능학습에 대한 습득과 파지에 미치는 영향", 한국체육학회지, 39(1), pp.282~292 (2000)
  2. 정청희, "스포츠 심리학의 이해" (1999), 도서출판 금광
  3. 정현채, "다수의 매개변인을 설정해야 하는 유사화제 학습이 맥락간섭효과에 미치는 영향", 한국체육학회지, 37(4), pp.288~295 (1998)
  4. 조영규, "연습방법의 다양성이 운동기술의 습득과 전이에 미치는 영향", 한국스포츠심리학회지, 11(2), pp.92~108 (2000)
  5. Alderman, R. B, "An analysis of incentive motivation in young Canadian ahtletes", Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 1, pp.169~176 (1976)
  6. Atkinson,J.W, "An Introduction to motivation" (1964), Van Nostrand
  7. Battig,W.F, "Facilitation and interference. IN:Acquisition and Skill" (1966), Academic Press
  8. Bortoli, L, "Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skill", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, pp.555~562 (1992)
  9. Boyce, B. A, "Designing applied research in a naturalistic setting using a contextual interference paradigm", Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, pp.189~200 (1990)
  10. Brady,F, "Contextual interference and teaching golf skills", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, pp.347~350 (1997)
  11. Del Rey,P, "Training and contextual interference effects on memory and transfer", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, pp.342~347 (1989)
  12. Delay, P, "Does retroactive inhibition influence contextual interference effect?", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(2), pp.120~126 (1994)
  13. Fairbrother,J.T, "The roles of response suppression and reinstatement in reminder trial effects in motor learning. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation" (2000), The Florida State University
  14. Fialho, J. V. A. P, "The contextual interference effect in a serve skill acquisition with experienced volleyball players", Journal of Human Movement Studies, 50, pp.65~78 (2006)
  15. French, K. E, "Effects of contextual interference do retention of three volleyball skills", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(1), pp.179~186 (1990)
  16. Goode, S, "Contextual interference effect in learning three badminton serve", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, pp.308~314 (1986)
  17. Green, H. K, "Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3), pp.835~841 (1994)
  18. Herbert, E. P, "Contextual interference in teaching open skills: Maching practice schedule to student skill level" (1994), Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
  19. Jones, L. L, "Effects of contextual interference on acquisition and retention of three volleyball skills", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, pp.105~890 (2007)
  20. Landin, D, "comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, pp.357~361 (1997)
  21. Lee, T. D, "The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 9, pp.730~746 (1983)
  22. Li, Y, "An assessment of the attention demands during random- and blocked-practice schedules", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(2), pp.591~506 (2000)
  23. Magill,R.A, "Motor learning: Concepts and Applications" (1989), Brown
  24. Magill,R.A, "Motor learning-Concepts and Applications-" (2001), McGraw-Hill Inc
  25. Magill, R. A, "A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition", Human Movement Science, 9, pp.241~289 (1990)
  26. Mattson,E.H, "Effects of contextual interference on acquisition, retention, and transfer accuracy in shooting a moving soccer ball. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation" (1995), San Jose State University
  27. Meira, C. M, "The contextual interference effect in acquisition of dart-throwing skill tested on a transfer test with extended trials", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, pp.910~918 (2001)
  28. Merira, C. M, "Contextual interference effects assessed by extended transfer trials in the acquisition of the volleyball serve", Journal of Human Movement Studies, 45, pp.449~468 (2003)
  29. Pelletier, L. G, "Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale(SMS)", Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, pp.35~53 (1995)
  30. Pigott, R. E, "Motor Schema : The structure of the variability session", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, pp.41~55 (1984)
  31. Pollock, B. J, "Dissociative contextual interference effects in children and adults", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, pp.83~92 (1997)
  32. Porter. J. M, "The effects of practicing a golf putting task moving along the contextual interference continuum", Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, pp.S151~ (2004)
  33. Prahl, B. K, "A field test of contextual interference effects on skill acquisition in pickle ball with seven-grade boy and girls", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(1), pp.A55~ (1995)
  34. Proteau, L, "The effects of the amount and variability of practice on the learning of a multisegmented motor task", Acta Psychologica, 85, pp.61~74 (1994)
  35. Schmidt,R.A, "A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning", Psychological Review, 82, pp.225~260 (1975)
  36. Schmidt,R.A, "Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice" (1991), Human Kinetics
  37. Schmidt, R. A, "Motor control and learning -A Behavior Empasis" (1999), Human Kinetics
  38. Shea, C, H, "Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), pp.179~187 (1979)
  39. Shea, C. H, "Contextual interference: Contributions of practice", Acta Psychologica, 73, pp.145~157 (1990)
  40. Sheworkis,P.A, "Is the contextual interference effect generalizable to computer games?", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, pp.3~15 (1997)
  41. Shewokis,P.A, "Memory consolidation and contextual interference effects with computer games", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, pp.581~589 (2003)
  42. Smith,P.J.K, "Attention and the contextual interference effects for a continuous task", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, pp.83~92 (1997)
  43. Smith,P.J.K, "Applying contextual interference to snowboarding skills", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, pp.999~1005 (2002)
  44. Smith, P. J. K, "Applying contextual interference to the pawlata roll", Journal of Sports Science, 13, pp.455~462 (1995)
  45. Ste-Marie, D. M, "High levels of contextual interference enhance handwriting skill acquisition", Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(1), pp.115~126 (2004)
  46. Tsutsui, S, "Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 30(2), pp.151~157 (1998)
  47. Vera, J. G, "Practice schedule and acquisition,retention,and transfer of a throwing task in 6-yr.-old children.Perceptual and Motor", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, pp.1015~1024 (2003)
  48. Williams, L, "The role of perceived competence in the motivation of physical activity", Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, pp.363~378 (1995)
  49. Wrisberg, C. A, "The effect of contextual variety on the practice, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, pp.406~412 (1991)
  50. Wulf, G, "Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning", Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, pp.254~263 (1993)
  51. Yoon,Y, "The effects of variable and random practice conditions on putting", Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 14(3), pp.227~236 (2003)
  52. Zander,A, "Motives and goal in group" (1971), Academic Press
  53. Zander,A, "Motivation and performance of sport group. In:Sport psychology: An analysis of athletic behavior", pp.63~75 (1980), Movement Publication
  54. Zimmerman,B.J, "A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning", Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), pp.329~339 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

동기이론에 입각한 맥락간섭효과가 테니스기술향상에 미치는 영향김지수한국홀리스틱융합교육학회 · 홀리스틱융합교육연구2010 · 제14권 제3호골프퍼팅 과제의 연습시간을 오전, 오후, 야간으로 배분할 때의 학습효과고영규, 곽연희, 서예원국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠과학원 · 체육과학연구2013 · 제24권 제3호맥락간섭과 결과지식의 동기적 속성이 타이밍 학습에 미치는 영향고지현, 한동욱국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠과학원 · 체육과학연구2015 · 제26권 제4호초보자 퍼팅 수행에서 자율성 지지 및 전체적-주의초점이 미치는 영향권택용, 모단단, 신석환국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠과학원 · 체육과학연구2025 · 제36권 제2호칭찬유형과 성공/실패수행 피드백이 골프기능 학습에 미치는 영향박종태미래교육원 · 초등교육연구2023 · 제38권 제3호자아선정 인지연습에 따른 맥락간섭 효과가 발달적 협응성 장애아의 운동기술 학습에 미치는 영향허진영한국특수체육학회 · 한국특수체육학회지2011 · 제19권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

비만인과 정상인 그룹 간 drop 착지 동작 시 수직 반발력과 보상행동 분석권문석, 신성휴, 선남수, 김상규pp. 1-10보행 시 발 교정구 착용에 따른 운동학적 비교 연구송주호pp. 11-21태권도 겨루기 선수들의 반달차기 동작의 운동학적 분석김봉경, 하철수, 최만호pp. 22-30유산소 운동프로그램 참여가 소아․청소년 IDDM 환자의 항산화 유전자 발현과 지질, DNA 손상에 미치는 영향여남회, 강성훈, 우진희pp. 31-38압박 의류 착용이 비만여성의 혈중지질, 신체구성, 체력에 미치는 영향정동춘, 선상규, 기선경, 이호진, 이강구pp. 39-50
원문 보기