본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임파워링 리더 행동과 창의성과의 관계에서 조직 신뢰의 매개효과 분석: 지방정부 관료들의 창의성 영향요인 탐색을 중심으로

Structural Relationship between Empowering Leader Behavior and Organizational Creativity with Organizational Trust as a Mediator : Focused on Investigating Antecedent Constructs of Organizational Creativity of Local Government Employees

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

창의적인 인적자원이 조직 경쟁력의 원천으로 인식되면서 창의성이 조직 효율성의 중요한 영향요인으로 부각되고 있다. 본 연구는 조직 생존과 발전의 핵심원천이 조직 창의성이라는 전제하에 조직 창의성을 주도적 창의성과 기대적 창의성으로 구분하고 이에 영향을미치는 변인으로 임파워링 리더 행동과 조직신뢰를 선정하여 경남지역 관료들 268명을 대상으로 이들 변인들간 구조적 관계를 실증적으로 분석하는 데 목적을 두였다. 분석 결과, 임파워링 리더 행동과 조직신뢰는 조직 창의성(주도적 창의성과 기대적 창의성)에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 동시에 조직신뢰는 임파워링 리더 행동과 조직 창의성간 관계에서 매개역할도 하는 것으로 확인되었다. 따라서 본 연구는 관료제적 통제 중심의 조직문화에서는 리더의 경직된 관리로 인해 구성원들의 창의성을 기대하기가 불가능하다는 사실을 근거로 구성원들의 주도적 창의력 발휘를 위해서는 리더의 역할이 매우 중요하며, 동시에 기대적 창의성을 높이기 위해서는 조직신뢰를 통한 사회.정서적 연결망을 만들어 지식과 정보 및 가치를 자발적으로 공유할 수 있는 조직구조로의 변화가 필요하다는 것을 확인하였다는 점에서 연구의 가치가 있는 것으로 판단된다.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between empowering leaderbehavior (ELB) and organizational creativity (OC: proactive and expected) withorganizational trust (OT) as a mediator effect through which the study not onlyexamines the effectiveness of ELB on OC, but suggests academic implications andmanagerial insights to management executives of local government. Participants inthe study were 268 public employees serving at public organizations in Kyungnamprovince of Korea, which are subject to relatively strong hierarchical culture. After developing the psychometric properties of the scales of ELB, OC and OTthe reliabilities of which have been verified by Cronbach's α coefficient,hypotheses were tested using a sample of 268 public workers from local governmentorganizations in Korea. Verifying empirically that ELB is expected to contribute to building trust andinstilling a sense of motivation, and enhancing employees’ respect and trusttowards their leader, the study proved that both ELB and OT are significantlycorrelated to proactive and expected OC. Also OT was proved to partiallymediate the effects between ELB and proactive and expected OC each. Conclusively, it is advised to strengthen ELB such as delegating discretionalauthority to the employees, contributing to instilling a true sense of motivationand strengthening employee’s trust which leads to influence significantly proactiveand expected creativity.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 김계수, "New Amos 7.0 구조방정식 모형 분석" (2007), 한나래
  2. 김승용, "임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 지식공유와 내재적 동기부여에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰 매개를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 14(2), pp.89~116 (2013), 한국지식경영학회
  3. 배병렬, "구조방정식 모델링" (2011), 청람
  4. 설경진, "호텔조직문화의 동기부여가 개인창의성에 미치는 영향 연구", 한국외식산업학회지, 5(2), pp.53~69 (2009), 한국외식산업학회
  5. Amabile, T. M., "Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do", California Management Review, 40(1), pp.39~58 (1997)
  6. "Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale" (2013)[URL]
  7. Aryee, S., "Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), pp.267~285 (2002)
  8. Bettencourt, L. A., "Role stressors and customer-oriented boundary-spanning behaviors in service organizations", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), pp.394~408 (2003)
  9. Bryant, A., "Self-leadership: How to become a more successful, efficient, and effective leader from the inside out" (2013), McGraw-Hill
  10. Collins, C. J., "Knowledge exchange and combination", Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), pp.544~560 (2006)
  11. Deci, E. L., "Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, pp.105~115 (1971)
  12. Diamantopoulos, A., "Introducing LISREL" (2000), Sage
  13. Galia, F., "Intrinsic-extrinsic motivations and knowledge sharing in French firms", The Icfaci Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), pp.56~80 (2008)
  14. George, J. M., "Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), pp.605~622 (2007)
  15. Hair, J. F., "A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)" (2013), SAGE Publication, Inc
  16. Hargadon, A. B., "When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work", Organization Science, 17, pp.484~500 (2006)
  17. Hon, A. H. Y., "Team Creative Performance: The Roles of Empowering Leadership, Creative-Related Motivation, and Task Interdependence", Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), pp.199~210 (2013)
  18. Huang, Q., "The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer-to-peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing", Information Systems Journal, 21, pp.557~577 (2011)
  19. Joo, B. K., "Creativity and human resource development: An integrative literature review and a conceptual framework for future research", Human Resource Development Review, 12, pp.390~402 (2013)
  20. Kerlinger, F. N., "Foundations of behavioral research" (2000), Thomson Learning
  21. Khazanchi, S., "Who and what is fair matters: A multi-foci social exchange model of creativity", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, pp.86~106 (2011)
  22. Laschinger, K. S., "Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage", Nursing Economic, 23(1), pp.6~13 (2005)
  23. MacCurtain, S. M., "The top management team, reflex ivity, knowledge sharin g and new product performance", Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), pp.219~232 (2010)
  24. MacPhee, M., "Testing the effects of an empowerment-based leadership development programme:part 2 - staff outcomes", Journal of Nursing Management, 22(1), pp.4~15 (2014)
  25. Mainemelis, C., "When the muse takes it all: A model for the experience of timelessness in organizations", Academy of Management Review, 26, pp.548~565 (2001)
  26. Marshall, E., "Transformational Leadership in Nursing" (2011), Springer Publishing
  27. Mayer, R. C., "Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?", Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), pp.874~888 (2005)
  28. Martin, S., "Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity", Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), pp.1372~1395 (2013)
  29. Mishra, A, K., "Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In Trust in organizations", pp.261~287 (1996), Sage
  30. Montag, T., "A Critical Analysis of the Workplace Creativity Criterion Space", Journal of Management, 38, pp.1362~1386 (2012)
  31. Nasurdin, A. M., "Training: Can It Be a Tool to Boost Service-Oriented Citizenship Behaviors?", Asian Social Science, 10(11), pp.141~148 (2014)
  32. Oldham, G. R., "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work", Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp.607~634 (1996)
  33. Podsakoff, P. M., "Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it", Annual Review of Psychology, 65, pp.539~569 (2012)
  34. Robinson, S. L., "Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behaviour", Journal of organizational behaviour, 16, pp.289~298 (1995)
  35. Raub, S., "Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values", Human Relations, 63(11), pp.1743~1770 (2010)
  36. Shalley, C. E., "What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity", The Leadership Quarterly, 15, pp.33~53 (2004)
  37. Srivastava, A. K., "Refractive indices, order parameter and principal polarizability of cholesteric liquid crystals and their mixtures", Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst, 454, pp.234~242 (2006)
  38. Swift, P. E., "The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning", The Learning Organization, 20(1), pp.20~37 (2013)
  39. Unsworth, K., "Unpacking creativity", Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp.289~297 (2001)
  40. Walumbwa, F. O., "Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, pp.4~24 (2011)
  41. Whitener, E. M., "Managers as initiator of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior", Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.513~530 (1998)
  42. Williams, M., "Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries", Academy of Management Review, 32(2), pp.595~621 (2007)
  43. Woodman, R. W., "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Review, 18(2), pp.293~321 (1993)
  44. Zhang X., "Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creativity process engagement", Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), pp.107~128 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

리더의 변혁적리더십과 직원의 혁신행동 관계에 조직신뢰의 매개효과에 관한 연구 - 지방공기업 이사장과 직원 관계를 중심으로 -강하영, 함요상한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2021 · 제35권 제1호상사의 임파워링 리더십과 조직구성원의 창의성 관계에서 심리적 안전감과 직무 자율성의 매개효과김준희, 김지혜, 이재은한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2021 · 제23권 제4호리더의 임파워링 행동이 혁신행동과 직무열의에 미치는 영향:상사신뢰 및 학습조직의 조절효과정선화, 탁진국한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2013 · 제26권 제4호심리적 임파워먼트와 창의성 - 내재적 동기부여의 매개효과 및 상사신뢰의 조절효과 -김선혁, 이승필한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2016 · 제23권 제1호임파워링 리더십이 조직구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 - 창의성의 매개효과 및 혁신지원분위기의 조절효과 -김정은, 장수덕, 최석봉한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2013 · 제20권 제3호과학기술분야 정부출연연구기관 연구개발 인력이 지각한 임파워링 리더십이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향: 전문가 지향성의 조절효과와 직무열의의 매개효과송은주, 이현응한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2024 · 제26권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)