본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Visioning Approach toward the Integration of Land Use and Transportation

최현선|최성연
국토연구원|2009.03|국토연구 (The Korea Spatial Planning Review)|제60권 |pp. 115-137|DOI 10.15793/kspr.2009.60..007

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

미래예측Land Use토지이용TransportationForecasting교통Scenario PlanningVisioningSmall Area Modeling비저닝시나리오계획소지역성장예측

초록

The visioning process, which is newly introduced in the regional planning process, has affected the existing growth planning process. It directly influenced the way of modeling the small area growth, while it has no or little effect on the way of forecasting the large area growth. The scenario approach was actively used as a significant way to identify alternative growth patterns. Four major findings of the growth planning process from the recent visioning approach in Southern California are as follows: First, growth planning is deemed as a participatory and interactive process in a collaborative framework. Second, growth planning relies on a very small geographical scale for better interactive communication. Third, people-driven growth planning puts more emphasis on the qualitative and bottom-up approach than on the quantitative and top-down approach in allocating regional growth into a grid cell. Fourth and last, the performance measures of transportation and environment are used to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the growth planning scenarios. The interactive evaluation process of diverse scenarios results in selecting or searching the most desirable and realistic land use and transportation scenario.

Abstract

The visioning process, which is newly introduced in the regional planning process, has affected the existing growth planning process. It directly influenced the way of modeling the small area growth, while it has no or little effect on the way of forecasting the large area growth. The scenario approach was actively used as a significant way to identify alternative growth patterns. Four major findings of the growth planning process from the recent visioning approach in Southern California are as follows: First, growth planning is deemed as a participatory and interactive process in a collaborative framework. Second, growth planning relies on a very small geographical scale for better interactive communication. Third, people-driven growth planning puts more emphasis on the qualitative and bottom-up approach than on the quantitative and top-down approach in allocating regional growth into a grid cell. Fourth and last, the performance measures of transportation and environment are used to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the growth planning scenarios. The interactive evaluation process of diverse scenarios results in selecting or searching the most desirable and realistic land use and transportation scenario.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. A Citizen's Guide to Transportation Policy and Planning, "A Publication of 1000 Friends of Oregon and the Oregon Transportation Reform Advocates Network", ~ (2002)
  2. Allen,, "INDEX:Software for Community Indicators. in.Planning Support Systems:Integrating Geographic Information Systems,Models,and Visualization Tools,", pp.229~261 (2001), ESRI Press.
  3. Ames,Steven C, "Guide to Community Visioning:Hands-on Information for Local Communities.Revised Edition." (2001), APA Planners Press
  4. Anas,A, "METROSIM:A Unified Economic Model of Transportation and Land-Use" (1994), Williamsville
  5. Ascher, "Forecasting:An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners." (1978), Hopkins University Press
  6. Avin,Uri P., "Getting Scenario-Building Right", .Planning November., 22~27 (2001)
  7. Avin,Uri, ""Using a Scenario Approach:From Business to Regional Futures". in Engaging the Future." (2007), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  8. Baer,W.C, "The Evolution of Housing Indicators and Housing Standards", Public Policy, 24, pp.361~393 (1976), Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management
  9. Barbour,Elisa and Michael Teitz, "Blueprint Planning in California:Forging Consensus on Metropolitan Growth and Development.San Francisco", Policy Institute of California, ~ (2006)
  10. Bartholomew,Keith, "Integrating Land Use Issues into Transportation Planning:Scenario Planning Summary Report.", ederal Highway Administration, ~ (2005)
  11. Berke,, "Urban Land Use Planning.5th ed." (2006), University of Illinois Press
  12. Brotchie,, "TOPAZ:General Planning Technique and Its Applications at the Regional,Urban,and Facility Planning Levels." (1980), Springer-Verlag
  13. Carmichael,J.,, "Georgia Basin Quest:an Integrated Assessment Modelling Tool", Global Environmental Change, 14(2), pp.171~183 (2004), Elsevier Science.
  14. 최현선, "미국의 광역 거버넌스와 지방정부 협의회: 참여와 비전수립", 국토연구, 54, pp.3~22 (2007), 국토연구원
  15. Croteau,, "Smart Places:A Tool for Design and Evaluation of Land Use Scenarios", Presented to the ESRI International User Conference. (1997)
  16. Curtin,Jr, "California Land Use and Planning Law." (1993), Solano Press
  17. De La Barra,, "Integrated Land Use and Transport Modeling:The Tranus Experience. in Planning Support Systems:Integrating Geographic Information Systems,Models,and Visualization Tools.", pp.129~156 (2001), ESRI Press.
  18. Deakin,Elizabeth, "A Manual of Regional Transportation Modeling Practice for Air Quality Analysi" (1993), National Association of Regional Councils
  19. Echenique,M.H.,, "The MEPLAN Models of Bilbao,", Leeds and Dortmund.n Transportation Reviews, 10, pp.309~322 (1990)
  20. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, "The Transportation Planning Process:Key Issues-A Briefing Book for Transportation Decisionmakers,Officials,and Staff.", Federal Highway Administration & Federal Transit Administration, ~ (2007)
  21. Fehr & Peers, "An Assessment of Integrated Land Use", Transportation Models., 2007
  22. Grant,J, "Vision,Planning,and Democracy.in .Engaging the Future." (2007), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  23. Hall,Peter, "Urban and Regional Planning 3rd ed." (1992), Routledge
  24. Hamilton,C., "A Short Method for Projecting Population by Age from One Decennial Census to Another", Social Forces, 41, pp.163~170 (1962), Univ.of North Carolina Press.
  25. Harris, "Plan or Projection:An Examination of the Use of Models in Planning", Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 26(4), pp.265~272 (1960), taylor & Francis Group.
  26. Harris, "New tools for Planning", Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31, pp.90~95 (1965), Taylor & Francis Group
  27. Helling,Amy, "Collaborative Visioning: Proceed with Caution!: Results from Evaluating Atlanta’s Vision 2020 Project”", Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), pp.335~349 (1998), Taylor & Francis Group
  28. Hopkins,Lewis D.and Marisa A.Zapata, "Engaging the Future: Tools for Effective Planning Practices in Engaging the Future" (2007), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  29. Hunt,J.D., "Design and Application of the PECAS Land Use Modelling System", Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management. (2003), Sendai
  30. Hunt,J.D., "Economic Base Studies for Urban and Regional Planning in The Profession of City Planning: Changes, Images, and Challenges." (2000), Center for Urban Policy Research Press.
  31. Hunt,J.D., "Projection,Forecast,and Plan", Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(2), pp.208~221 (1984), Taylor & Francis Group.
  32. Johnston, Robert A, "UPlan: A Versatile Urban Growth Model for Transportation Planning", Transportation Research Record, 1831, pp.202~209 (2004), Elsevier Science
  33. Assessment of Integrated Transportation, "Land Use Models:Final Report", Johnston
  34. Klosterman, "Community Analysis and Planning Techniques." (1990), Rowman and Littlefield
  35. Klosterman, "The What If? Planning Support System. in Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools" (2001), ESRI Press
  36. Krumholz,N, "A Retrospective View of Equity Planning, Cleveland 1969-79 in Introduction to Planning History in the United States" (1983), Center for Urban Policy Research
  37. Kwartler, "Community Viz:An Integrated Planning Support System. in Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools", pp.285~308 (2001), ESRI Press
  38. Landis, "CUF, CUF II, and CURBA: A Family of Spatially Explicit Urban Growth and Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools” in Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools", pp.157~200 (2001), ESRI Press
  39. Lee,Colin, "Models in Planning:An Introduction to the Use of Quantitative Models in Planning." (1973), Pergamon Press
  40. Lemp, "Visioning vs. Modeling: Analyzing the Land Use-Transportation Futures of Urban Regions", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 134(3), pp.97~109 (2008), American Society of Civil Engineers
  41. Lemp,, "From Aggregate Methods to Microsimulation: Assessing the Benefits of Microscopic Activity-Based Models of Travel Demand”", Transportation Research Record, 1994, pp.80~88 (2007), Elsevier Science
  42. Levy, "Contemporary Urban Planning. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River" (2006), Prentice Hall
  43. Lowry,I.S, "A Model of Metropolis,Santa Monica," (1964), Rand Corporation
  44. Meck, "Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook:Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change." (2002), American Planning Association
  45. Myers, "Constructing the Future in Planning: A Survey of Theories and Tools", Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), pp.221~231 (2000), Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
  46. Myers,, "Putting the Future in Planning: Introduction", Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), pp.365~367 (2001), American Planning Association
  47. Myers, "Estimation of Housing Needs Amidst Population Growth and Change", Housing Policy Debate, 13(3), pp.567~596 (2002), Fannie Mae Foundation
  48. National Transit Institute, "NTI Course on Transportation and Land Use." (2008), New Brunswick
  49. Neilson, "Narrating the Vision:Scenarios in Action", The Futurist, 39(3), pp.26~30 (2005), The Futurist
  50. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade, "Land Use Impacts of Transportation: A Guidebook" (1999), National Academy Press
  51. Porter, "Regional Governance of Metropolitan Form: The Missing Link in Relating Land Use and Transportation", Transportation, Urban Form, and the Environment, Transportation Research Board Special Report, 231, pp.63~80 (1991), Transportation Research Board
  52. Prastacos,P, "An Integrated Land-Use- Transportation Model for the San Francisco Region: 1. Design and Mathematical Structure", Environment and Planning, 18, pp.307~322 (1986), Pion Ltd
  53. Prastacos,P, "An Integrated Land-Use- Transportation Model for the San Francisco Region: 2. Empirical Estimation and Results", Environment and Planning, 18, pp.511~528 (1986), Pion Ltd.
  54. Putman,S.H, "Integrated Urban Models, Policy Analysis of Transportation and Land Use" (1983), Pion Limited.
  55. Putman, "The Metropilus Planning Support System: Urban Models and GIS inPlanning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools", pp.99~128 (2001), ESRI Press
  56. Rodier, "Verifying the Accuracy of Land Use Models Used in Transportation and Air Quality Planning: A Case Study in the Sacramento, California Region", Mineta Transportation Institute, College of Business, San Jose State University., ~ (2005)
  57. Ross,C.L., "Land Use Transportation Interaction:An Examination of the 1995 NPTS Data.", Federal Highway Administration,US Department of Transportation, ~ (1997)
  58. Science Applications International Corporation, "Projecting Land-Use Change: A Summary of Models for Assessing the Effects of Community Growth and Change on Land-Use Patterns", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., ~ (2000)
  59. Shipley, "Visioning: Did Anyone See Where It Came From?", Journal of Planning Literature, 1294, pp.407~416 (1998), Ohio State Univ
  60. Shipley, "Visioning in Planning: Is the Practice Based on Sound Theory?", Environment and Planning, 34(1), pp.7~22 (2002), Pion Ltd
  61. Simmonds, "The Objectives and Design of a New Land-Use Modelling Package: DELTA in Regional Science in Business", pp.159~188 (2001)
  62. Smith, "State and Local Population Projections: Methodology and Analysis", pp.2001, Kluwer Academic
  63. Sohn,Dong Wook, "Growth Planning and Metropolitan Governance: Case Study of Southern California in the US", KRIHS Policy Brief, 153, pp.1~8 (2007), KRIHS
  64. Southern California Compass: Growth Vision Report, "Southern California Association of Governments", Southern California Association of Governments., ~ (2004)
  65. Southern California Association of Governments, "Your Guide to SCAG 2007-2008", Southern California Association of Governments, ~ (2007)
  66. Wachs,M, "Forecasting versus Envisioning: A New Window on the Future", Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), pp.367~372 (2001), American Planning Association
  67. Waddell,P, "Urban Sim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation and Environmental Planning", Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), pp.297~314 (2002), American Planning Association
  68. Waddell,P., "Introduction to Urban Simulation: Design and Development of Operational Models”. in Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, Volume 5(Handbooks in Transport", pp.203~236 (2004), Pergamon Press
  69. Waddell,P., "Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of Urban Sim", Networks and Spatial Economics, 3(1), pp.43~67 (2003), Pennsylvania State Univ
  70. Waddell,, "Between Politics and Planning: Urban Sim as a Decision-Support System for Metropolitan Planning” in Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools.", pp.201~228 (2001), ESRI Press.
  71. Walker, "UPlan: Geographic Information System as Framework for Integrated Land Use Planning Model", Transportation Research Record, 1994, pp.117~127 (2008), Elsevier Science.
  72. Wegener,M, "Operational Urban Models: State of the Art", Journal of American Planning Association, 60(1), pp.17~29 (1994), American Planning Association

관련 논문AI추천

Land Use and Sustainable Transportation: An Interpretive Review of Research in the U.S. and Policy Implications이삼수, 이재수서울연구원 · 서울도시연구2010 · 제11권 제4호토지이용-교통 통합모형의 이론 및 적용사례의 고찰과 구축방안 논의유건화, 조성진국토연구원 · 국토연구2017 · 제94권 Climate Change and Regional Land Use Planning：The Formulation of California Senate Bill No. 375최성연, 최현선한국환경연구원 · 환경정책연구2010 · 제9권 제1호Exploring a Method of Estimating Vehicle Miles of Travel시화 후, 최성연, Christopher J. Gray, Frank Wen, Gerard Walters한국교통연구원 · 교통연구2012 · 제19권 제1호통합 토지이용 교통모형을 이용한 교통정책평가에 관한 연구 Ⅰ: 기존사례연구를 중심으로손지언, 이승재한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2010 · 제9권 제1호토지이용-교통 통합모형 구축 및 계획 간 정합성 평가에 관한 연구왕광익, 유선철, 조규영국토연구원 · 국토연구2011 · 제69권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

사회적 재정비를 위한 거점확산형 주거환경개선사업 도입방안 연구서수정, 이창호, 배웅규, 임정민pp. 3-28동남권 내 외국인직접투자가 지역 및 국민경제에 미치는 효과이동우, 조경엽, 정호진, 김영덕pp. 29-45아파트 임대차계약 당사자의 공동균형에 관한 연구: 수도권을 중심으로임재만pp. 47-59세계화시대의 도시범죄관련 미국 도시설계와 질서유지정책권태정pp. 61-80아시아 개도국 민자사업의 자금조달 효율화 방안: 우리나라의 경험에 근거하여오규택, 박창균, 박동규pp. 81-96
원문 보기