중국어 사전의 어휘 연구-쌍음절 언어단위를 중심으로-
A Research on the Differences between old and modern Chinese Disyllabic L anguage Units
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Some disyllabic language units(they are composed of two same Chinese characters and they could be words, phrases, or other constructions)in old and contemporary Chinese are different from each other in the perspective of phonological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic viewpoint. Phonologically, dissimilar pronunciation between old and modern Chinese results in unlike meanings of disyllabic language units. Syntactically, differences between two types of Chinese are revealed in “predicate+object”, “attributive verb phrase”, “coordinate verb phrase”, “verb”; “attributive adjective phrase”, “coordinate adjective phrase”, “adjective”; “attributive noun phrase”, “coordinate noun phrase”, “noun”; “adverb”, “pronoun”, “subject + predicate”, “conjunction + pronoun”, “predicate + complement”, “preposition + object”, “number+measure word”, “coordinate number phrase”, “preposition + verb”, “conjunction + verb”, “verb + conjunction”, “preposition + preposition” construction. Semantically, the differences are shown as the form of meaning enlargement, contraction and shift. Pragmatically, they have been changed from good connotation to bad one and vice versa.
Abstract
Some disyllabic language units(they are composed of two same Chinese characters and they could be words, phrases, or other constructions)in old and contemporary Chinese are different from each other in the perspective of phonological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic viewpoint. Phonologically, dissimilar pronunciation between old and modern Chinese results in unlike meanings of disyllabic language units. Syntactically, differences between two types of Chinese are revealed in “predicate+object”, “attributive verb phrase”, “coordinate verb phrase”, “verb”; “attributive adjective phrase”, “coordinate adjective phrase”, “adjective”; “attributive noun phrase”, “coordinate noun phrase”, “noun”; “adverb”, “pronoun”, “subject + predicate”, “conjunction + pronoun”, “predicate + complement”, “preposition + object”, “number+measure word”, “coordinate number phrase”, “preposition + verb”, “conjunction + verb”, “verb + conjunction”, “preposition + preposition” construction. Semantically, the differences are shown as the form of meaning enlargement, contraction and shift. Pragmatically, they have been changed from good connotation to bad one and vice versa.
참고문헌 (21)
- 舒新城, "辞海" (1947), 中华书局
- 商務印書館編輯部, "辭源" (1987), 商務印書館香港分館
- 漢語大字典編輯委員會, "漢語大字典" (1993), 四川辭書出版社.湖北辭書出版社
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典" (1991), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 郭芹纳, "简明古汉语知识辞典" (1990), 陕西人民出版社
- 汉语常用词词典编写组, "汉语常用词词典" (1989), 福州人民出版社
- 洪成玉, "古汉语词义分析" (1985), 天津人民出版社
- 李扬镜, "常用词古今义例释" (1987), 湖南教育出版社
- 李宗江, "汉语以常用词演变研究" (1999), 汉语大词典出版社
- 罗邦柱, "古汉语知识辞典" (1988), 武汉大学出版社
- 刘庆俄, "汉语常用字古今义对比字典" (1992), 南海出版社
- 刘叔新, "汉语描写词汇学" (1990), 商务印书馆
- 史存直, "汉语词汇史纲要" (1989), 华东师范大学出版社
- 孙常叙, "汉语词汇" (1956), 吉林人民出版社
- 孙树松, "简明古今异义词词典" (1989), 对外贸易教育出版社
- 王春庭, "古汉语词义分析" (1997), 江西教育出版社
- 王德惠, "古今詞義對比辭典" (1989), 吉林文史出版社
- 王克仲, "古今詞義辨析词典" (1993), 黑龙江人民出版社
- 张联荣, "古汉语词义论" (2000), 北京大学出版社
- 赵振钧, "简明语文词语10用词典" (1991), 北京工业大学出版社
- 周荐, "词语的意义和结构" (1994), 天津古籍出版社