真值语义相同下的“才”和“就”之比较
comparative study of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” in the same meaning of truth valu e semantics
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“cai(才)”and“jiu(就)”,both of them are adverbs that have meaning of emphasis. But even in the same meaning of truth value, their direction, range, meaning are not the same. “cai(才)”has a clear meaning of reverse converse. On the contrary, “jiu(就)”has a meaning of positive definite. When teaching Chinese to nonnative students ,“cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” are one of the common obstacle making it difficult for them to understand chinese grammars. Being a kind of expletive that don’t have any concrete meaning, only having functional meaning, “caiconfusion easily.” and “jiu(就)” can make the students learning chinese confusion easily. Their position and function in the sentence is the same, so students make errors repeatedly. Thus there are no little comparative studies of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. But there are only a few studies about their basic color of emotion, grammatical meaning, and derivative uses. I hope, this study will be able to help the students to understand differences between “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. This essay is the comparative study of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” in the same meaning of truth value in the reductive context way.
Abstract
“cai(才)”and“jiu(就)”,both of them are adverbs that have meaning of emphasis. But even in the same meaning of truth value, their direction, range, meaning are not the same. “cai(才)”has a clear meaning of reverse converse. On the contrary, “jiu(就)”has a meaning of positive definite. When teaching Chinese to nonnative students ,“cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” are one of the common obstacle making it difficult for them to understand chinese grammars. Being a kind of expletive that don’t have any concrete meaning, only having functional meaning, “caiconfusion easily.” and “jiu(就)” can make the students learning chinese confusion easily. Their position and function in the sentence is the same, so students make errors repeatedly. Thus there are no little comparative studies of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. But there are only a few studies about their basic color of emotion, grammatical meaning, and derivative uses. I hope, this study will be able to help the students to understand differences between “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)”. This essay is the comparative study of “cai(才)” and “jiu(就)” in the same meaning of truth value in the reductive context way.
참고문헌 (10)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (1982), 外语教学与研究出版社
- 史锡尧, "副词“才”与“都”、“就”语义的对立和配合", 世界汉语教学, (一) (1991)
- 陈小荷, "主观量问题初探——兼谈副词“就”、“才”、“都”", 世界汉语教学, (四) (1994)
- 周守晋, "“主观量”的语义信息特征与“就”、“才”的语义》", 北京大学学报·哲社版, (三) (2004)
- 陈立民, "也说“就”和“才”", 当代语言学, 七(一) (2005)
- 王群力, "略说汉语主观量———以副词“才”、“就”为例》", 辽宁大学学报·哲社版, (三) (2005)
- 张旭, "估价副词“就”和“才”的语用过程分析》", 天津师大学报·社科版, (二) (1999)
- 王群, "试论“才”和“就”语义变化的双向性和不平衡性", 语言科学, (四) (2005)
- 白梅丽, "现代汉语中“就”和“才”的语义分析", 中国语文, (五) (1987)