Responding to Students Writing: Peer and Teacher Feedback

참고문헌 (50)

1. Allaei, S. K, "Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms" (1990)
2. Baker, M, "Can lurking on the MOO help improve EFL English composition?" (1995), Kaoshiung, Taiwan, R. O. C.
3. Berger, V, "The effects of peer and self feedback", pp.21~35 (1990)
4. Brannon, C, "On students′ right to their own texts: A model of teacher response", pp.157~166 (1984)
5. Carson, J, "Writing Groups: Cross-cultural issues", pp.17~30 (1994)
6. Cohen, A. D, "Student processing of feedback on their compositions" (1987)
7. Cohen, A. D, "Feedback on composition: Teacher and student verbal reports" (1990)
8. Connor, U, "Peer response group in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?", pp.257~276 (1994)
9. Connor, U, "The teaching of topical analysis as a revision strategy: An exploratory study", pp.126~139 (1990), Cambridge University Press.
10. Davies, N. F, "Peer group teaching and the composition class", pp.313~323 (1987)
11. Emig, J, "The composing processes of twelfth graders" (1971)
12. Ferris, D., "Student reactions to the teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", 29, pp.33~53 (1995)
13. Ferris, D., "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision", 31, pp.315~337 (1997)
14. Flower, L, "A cognitive process theory of writing", pp.365~387 (1981)
15. Goldstein, L, "Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences", pp.443~460 (1990)
16. Graves, D, "An examination of the writing processes of seven-year-old children", pp.228~231 (1975)
17. Hairston, M, "The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing", pp.76~88 (1982)
18. Hedgcock, J, "Collaborative oral", aural revision in foreign language writing instruction, 1992, 255~276
19. Hillocks, G., Jr, "Research on written composition: New directions for teaching" (1986)
20. James, D. R, "Peer teaching in the writing classroom", pp.48~50 (1981)
21. Jenkins, R, "Responding to student writing: Written dialogues on writing and revision", pp.82~86 (1987)
22. Knoblauch, C. H, "Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art", pp.1~4 (1981)
23. Koch, R, "Syllogisms and superstition: The current state of responding to writing", pp.464~471 (1982)
24. Lamberg, W, "Self-provided and peer-provided feedback", pp.63~69 (1980)
25. Leki, I, "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes", pp.5~19 (1990)
26. Leki, I, "Coaching from the margin: issues in written responses", pp.284~294 (1990), Cambridge University Press.
27. Leki, I, "The Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes", pp.203~218 (1991)
28. Leki, I, "Understanding ESL writers: A guide for teachers" (1992), Heinemann.
29. Mangelsdorf, K, "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?", pp.274~284 (1992)
30. Mendonca, C, "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", pp.745~769 (1994)
31. Mittan, R, "The peer review process: Harnessing students′ communicative power", pp.172~219 (1989)
32. Nelson, G. L, "An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions", pp.257~276 (1992)
33. Nelson, G. L, "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", pp.135~142 (1993)
34. Patridge, K. L, "A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teachers evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written composition" (1983)
35. Perl, S, "Five writers writing: Case studies of the composing processes of unskilled college writers" (1978), New York University.
36. Perl, S, "The composing processes of unskilled college writers", pp.317~336 (1979)
37. Pianko, S, "A description of the composing process of college freshman writers", pp.5~22 (1979)
38. Radecki, P. M, "ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work", pp.355~365 (1988)
39. Reid, J, "Teaching ESL writing" (1993), Prentice Hall Regents.
40. Rohman, D. G, "Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process", pp.106~112 (1965)
41. Saito, H, "Teachers′ practices and students′ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners", pp.46~70 (1994)
42. Semke, H. D, "The effects of the red pen" (1984)
43. Stanley, J, "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", pp.217~233 (1992)
44. Tyson, R. E, "Motivation, self-confidence, and the process approach in Korean university writing classes" (1997)
45. Tyson, R. E., "Increasing motivation and confidence in Asian university- level EFL writers" (1998)
46. Tyson, R. E., "Academic writing and the process approach" (1999)
47. Tyson, R. E., "Increasing the effectiveness of composition instruction in Korean university English classes", 21, pp.205~214 (2000)
48. Zamel, V, "The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies", pp.165~187 (1983)
49. Zamel, V, "Responding to students writing", pp.79~101 (1985)
50. Zhang, S, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천