본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

김현 初期 批評 연구

A Study of Kim Hyun's Early Criticism

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

본 논문은 한국 현대문학 비평사에서 중요한 위치를 점하고 있는 비평가 김현의 初期 비평세계에 대한 해명을 목적으로 삼고 있다. 청년 김현의 평단 데뷔작 나르시스 시론은 ‘프랑스 象徵主義 詩學’과 ‘無神論的 實存主義’의 수용을 토대로 한 것으로 김현 문학인식론의 윤곽을 제시하고 있다. 데뷔 직후에 씌어진 앙드레 브르통이 서정주에게 주는 편지, 불빛이 말하는 이유 등의 산문은 그가 文學靑年期의 발상법을 청산하고 비평가로 거듭 나는 순간의 ‘過渡期的 意識 상태’를 노정하고 있다. 이 산문들 속에서 김현은 새로운 문학의 수립을 갈망하는 認定鬪爭的 욕망을 노출하고 있으며 超現實主義의 顚覆 정신과 프로이트 精神分析學에 대한 깊은 관심을 보여준다. 강력한 批評的 自意識의 형성과 小說의 原理에 대한 이론적 추구의 과정을 드러내고 있는 批評考는 청년기의 김현이 추구했던 知的 冒險의 결산이자 批評家로서 正體性의 확립을 의미한다.

Abstract

Kim, Hyun is one of the critics who has given major and enduring influences on literary criticism since the Korean War. He was one of the new generations who experienced a bit affluent society recovered after the tumult of the war. Based on his new and innovative recognition of the zeitgeist he was taking the lead of the struggle against ‘symbolic violence' since the 1960s. The evaluation on his works is still debated as much as his status in Korean literary history. In my view, the first thing that needs to be done is to evaluate his works with more objective point of views. This study will be focused on a close examination of his early works with the need of reevaluation. When he started his career as a critic, Kim, Hyun studied general knowledge about criticism and constructed his own critical point of view. With the formation of his own critical thought he made an array of projected critical works continuously. His starting work as a critic was “Narcissist Poetics”. Based on French symbolist poetics and Atheist- Existentialism, “Narcissist Poetics” was the epistemological cornerstone of his thought on literature. His “A History of Love Affairs,” “A Letter from André Breton to Seo Jung-joo,” “The Reasons of that Light tells,” revealed the intermediate progress to be a maturing critic out of early literary thought. By these works Kim, Hyun expressed his desire to establish innovative literary criticism and showed his great interest to subversive aspects of surrealism and Freudian psychoanalysis. His “Consideration on Criticism” studied histories and objects of criticism, the way how to analyse literary texts with a broad view. This proved that it was the product of his early intellectual exploration and the establishment of his critical view on literature.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. "韓國文學의 位相ꡕ" (1977), 문학과지성사
  2. "전체에 대한 통찰ꡕ" (1990)
  3. 권성우, "1960년대 비평에 나타난 ‘현대성’ 연구", (25), pp.15~ (1999), 일지사
  4. 김윤식, "19세대의 내면 풍경」", pp.~4 (1990)
  5. 이명원, "김현 문학비평 연구" (1999), 29
  6. 임영봉, "한국 현대문학 비평사론", pp.181~ (2000), 역락
  7. 임영봉, "19세대 비평담론의 형성과정", 16 (2003), 우리문학회
  8. 임영봉, "김현 비평의 기원", 3, pp.193~201 (2006), 한겨레어문학회
  9. 임영봉, "동인지 散文時代 연구", 우리문학연구, (21), pp.395~420 (2007), 우리문학회
  10. 정규웅, "글동네에서 생긴 일" (1999), 문학세계사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)