학습장애의 정의와 진단적 평가기준의 법적 규정을 위한 대안 탐색
Exploring the Measure to Set Forth Legal Provisions for the Definition and the Diagnostic Evaluation Criteria of Learning Disability
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 학습장애의 정의와 진단적 평가 기준의 법적 규정을 위한 대안을 탐색하였다. 학습장애의 개념을 규정하고 진단평가의 준거를 설정하며, 합리적이고 타당성 있는 판별 절차를 확보하기 위해서는 이 장애가 지닌 속성을 학습의 측면에서 규정짓고, 장애의 결정이 사회적 구인의 문제임을 인식하며 합의과정을 모색하는 것이 바람직하다는 입장이다. 논의 과정에서 새로운 정보를 제시하기보다 한국학습장애학회에서 주최한 심포지엄의 결과를 종합하여 학회 차원에서 합의된 결과를 도출할 수 있는 계기를 마련하는 데 중점을 두었다. 본 논문에서는 사회적 배경 요인, 특수교육 관련 법령 개정을 위한 기초 연구 방향, 학습장애의 법적 개념 및 진단 평가 방법과 판별의 실제를 검토하고 이를 근거로 학습장애의 정의와 진단 기준 및 방법을 제안하였다.
Abstract
The key to this discussion lies in the fact that the learning disability is influenced the most by the social factor which is agreed and determined by specific members of specific local culture. We must bear in mind that the arguments which were made to clarify the identify of learning disability are not the matter of right or wrong. Rather, it is a matter of choice. The concept and identification of learning disability needs the process of validation through various basic research and related studies. Specifically, tardiness in learning or low achievement must be studied and reviewed in-depth in the process. However, constraints on ultimate problem make it hard to go beyond the consensus or choice. In particular, the learning disability must be considered as a particular form of learning demand and those with learning disability must be defined carefully, in consideration that the concept and model of disability has been highlighted, shifting away from the medical standpoint, and the disability is defined as 'sameness and difference', not the defect or sheer difference, and the person with disability is accepted and embraced as a member of community. Obviously, the law lays out a common denominator to provide the basis for the guarantee of minimum right. Therefore, the education in reality must focus on maximizing the potential of individual and help them adjust to future society in a way that goes beyond the realm of law. Finally, a measure must be explored that the community can agree upon in the constant process of consensus and choice because the identity and identification criteria of learning disability are determined, depending on our ability to provide educational service.
참고문헌 (46)
- 강재륜, "철학" (1996), 일신사
- 김성애, "독일의 학습장애아 교육", 학습장애의 학문적 토대 확립. 한국학습장애학회 2005춘계 심포지엄 (2005)
- 김자경, "학습장애 판별방법 및 절차에 관한 고찰: 학습장애 정의에 따른 관련 논문 분석을 중심으로", 특수교육학연구, 36(1), pp.101~126 (2001)
- 김자경, "학습장애의 개념과 분류의 대안 탐색에 대한 토론", 학습장애의 학문적 토대 확립. 한국학습장애학회 2005춘계 심포지엄 (2005)
- 특수교육 관련 법령 개정을 위한 기초연구, "박지연", 교육인적자원부, ~, pp.정책연구 2005 공모과제-18 (2005)
- 신종호, "학습장애의 개념과 분류의 대안 탐색에 대한 토론", 학습장애의 학문적 토대 확립. 한국학습장애학회 2005춘계 심포지엄 (2005)
- 학습장애아 특성분석과 진단도구, "이나미", 한국교육개발원, ~ (1990)
- 이상훈, "학습장애와 사정에 대한 논의", 정서․학습장애연구, 15(2), pp.101~120 (1999)
- 정대영, "학습장애 개념에 관한 이론적 모델 연구", 특수교육학회지, 12, pp.89~105 (1991)
- 정대영, "학습장애의 개념과 분류", 정서․학습장애아교육, 9 (1993)
- 정대영, "학습장애아동을 위한 읽기교수 기법 탐색", 정서․학습장애연구, 17(1), pp.19~51 (2001)
- 정대영, "학습장애의 개념 및 진단평가의 문제와 과제", 정서·행동장애연구, 18(1), pp.63~88 (2002), 한국정서·행동장애아교육학회
- 정대영, "장애학생의 기능평가와 특수교육 의사결정", 특수아동교육연구, 5(1), pp.91~108 (2003)
- 정대영, "행동과학과 특수교육 연구의 희망적 전망과 해결 과제", 정서·행동장애연구, 21(1), pp.1~24 (2005), 한국정서·행동장애아교육학회
- 정대영, "특수교육진흥법 개정 방향과 원칙 탐색", 특수아동교육연구, 8(1), pp.1~26 (2006), 한국특수아동학회
- 한기언, "21세기 한국의 교육학" (2003), 한국학술정보
- 허승준, "학습장애의 진단과 평가", 학습장애의 학문적 토대 확립. 한국학습장애학회 2005춘계 심포지엄 (2005)
- 황원영, "특수교육철학" (1997), 교육과학사
- 上野一彦, "LDどは: 症狀, 原因, 診斷の だめに" (1996), 靑木書店
- Ackerman, P., "Children with learning disabilities : WISC profiles", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, pp.150~166 (1971)
- Berninger, V. W., "Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols" (1994)
- Bradley, R., "Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice" (2002), Erlbaum
- Daly, E., "A model of conducting functional analysis of academic performance problems", School Psychology Review, 26, pp.554~557 (1997)
- Davis, G. A., "Education of the gifted and talented" (2004), Pearson
- Davis, L. J., "Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism & other difficult position" (2002), New York University Press
- Devlieger, P., "Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts and communities" (2003), Garant
- Fuchs, L., "Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities", Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, pp.204~219 (1998)
- Good, R. H., "Operationalizing response to intervention in eligibility decisions", Paper presented at the National Research Center on learning disabilites responsiveness-to-intervention symposium (2003)
- Greshman, F. M., "Conceptualizing behavior disorders in terms of resistance to intervention", School Psychology Review, 20, pp.23~36 (1991)
- Gutkin, T. B., "WISC-R scatter indices: Useful information for differential diagnosis?", Journal of School Psychology, 17, pp.368~371 (1979)
- Hallaha, D. P., "Learning disabilities: Foundation, characteristics, and effective teaching" (2005), Pearson
- Hammill, D. D., "On defining learning disabilities : An emerging consensus", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), pp.74~84 (1990)
- Kauffman, A. S., "The WISC-R and learning disabilities assessment : State of the art", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, pp.520~526 (1981)
- Kavale, K. A., "A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler Scale profile and recategorizations: Patterns and parodies?", Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, pp.136~156 (1984)
- Oregon Department of Education, "Identification of students with learning disabilities under the IDEA 2004", ~ (2005)
- Reschly, R. J., "What if LD identification changed to reflect research findings?", Paper presented at the National Research Center on learning disabilities responsiveness-to-intervention symposium (2003)
- Slee, R., "The politics of theorising special education, In Theorising special education" (1998), Routledge
- Simeonsson, R. J., "Prompoting children's health, education, and well being, In Risk, resilience, and prevention: Promoting the well-being of all children" (1994), Paul H. Brooks
- Soder, M., "Disability as a social construct: the labelling approach revisited", European Journal of Special Needs Education, 4(2), pp.117~129 (1989)
- Stainback, W., "Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives" (1996), Allyn & Bacon
- Stiker, H. J., "The history of disability" (1999), The University of Michigan Press
- Swanson, H. L., "Definition X treatment interaction for students with learning disabilities", School Psychology Review, 33, pp.114~136 (1999)
- Thomas, G., "Destructing special education and constructing inclusion" (2001), Open University Press
- Walker, H. M., "Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among schools-age children and youth", Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, pp.194~209 (1996)
- Wisconsoin Department of Public Instruction, "The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004", Implications for educators who work with students with SLD selected experts, ~ (2005)
- Wisconsoin Department of Public Instruction, "Specific learning disability assessment and decision-making: Technical assistance guide", ~ (2005)