본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학교 학습장애 판별 준거에 관한 논의:불일치 준거와 대안적인 방안을 중심으로

Approach to the Identification of Learning Disabilities

김자경
한국특수아동학회 (Kacsn: Korean Association Of The Children With Special Need)|2005.12|특수아동교육연구 (The Journal of Special Children Education)|제7권 제4호|pp. 255-276

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

학습장애cognitive deficitsdiscrepancy판별classificationcriterialearning disabilities준거중재반응모델불일치개념선별과정인지적 결함대안적 교수방법pre-referral stepresponsiveness to interventionalternative intervention strategy
주제분류교육학

초록

학습장애의 판별에 관한 논쟁은 학습장애라는 용어가 사용된 이래 지금까지 지속되고 있다. 불일치 준거에 대한 끊임없는 문제제기와 더불어 IDEA는 불일치 준거의 폐지와 함께 중재반응기초 준거를 새로이 제시하였다. 이에 본 논문은 IQ와 성취 간의 불일치 모델을 기반으로 하는 학습장애 진단 준거에 대한 그동안의 주요 논의점을 검토해보고, 현재 진행되고 있는 학습장애 판별의 문제점들을 제기한다. 또한 최근 들어 여러 연구자들에 의해 불일치 준거의 대안으로 제시되고 있는 두 종류의 준거, 즉 인지기술 결함을 바탕으로 한 준거와 중재반응모델을 기반으로 하는 준거에 대해 학교현장에서 학습장애를 판별하는데 적용가능한지에 대해 살펴본다. 이러한 논의를 바탕으로 본 논문은 현장에 적용가능하면서 ‘순수한’ 학습장애를 판별하기 위한 다단계 진단과정을 제안한다.

Abstract

Issues on how to identify children with learning disabilities have consistently been under debate in the area of special education. The criteria of a discrepancy between IQ and achievement had been widely used to identify the children with learning disabilities before IDEA adopted the new criteria on the basis of Responsiveness to intervention(RTI) model in 2004. Recently, cognitive approaches, particularly on reading disabilities, have also been used as the criteria to identify learning disabilities. Despite their own theoretical rationale, however, the previous approaches pose some problems in assessing various aspects of learning disabilities. This paper suggests a multiple-step procedure for the identification of children with learning disabilities. The multiple-step procedure emphasizes a pre-referral step in particular. The pre-referral step refers to a screening process to sort out the at-risk children from those who have learning difficulties due to other deficits. It is also suggested that various alternative interventions be used for the target children for a certain period of time in order to see if the target children's learning difficulties are originated from the teacher's inappropriate and insufficient instruction. This pre-referral step is important to avoid the possibility that children are incorrectly judged to have disabilities. This paper also recommends that both formal and informal diagnostic devices be used to solve the discrepancy between the potential ability and the actual achievement. The informal diagnostic devices need be adopted in the identification procedure since the formal standardized instruments are not sufficient to assess diverse properties of learning disabilities.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. "학습장애아동의 이해와 교육" (2003), 학지사
  2. "한글 읽기장애 아동의 음운인식 능력과 명명속도 결손에 관한 비교 연구", 12(2), pp.241~254 (2003)
  3. "2004 미국 특수교육법 개정에 즈음하여 살펴본 미국 특수교육의 동향 학습장애 영역을 중심으로", pp.21~30 (2005)
  4. "학습장애의 판별방법 및 절차에 관한 고찰", 36, pp.101~126 (2001)
  5. "읽기장애아의 음운 처리 고찰", 17(2), pp.43~70 (2001)
  6. "단순언어장애유아와 일반유아의 작업기억 및 음운 인식 특성 연구", 7(1), pp.217~235 (2005)
  7. "한글독해장애 아동의 작업 기억, 단기 기억, 읽기속도, 통사지식에 관한 연구", 17(2), pp.105~121 (1998)
  8. "학습장애의 진단 및 평가 토론", pp.67~74 (2005), 한국학습장애학회 춘계 심포지움
  9. "음운인식훈련이 읽기장애아동의 음운인식 읽기에 미치는 효과", 12(2), pp.61~80 (2003)
  10. "Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.178~186 (1991), Aaron
  11. "Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities", 36, pp.151~164 (2003)
  12. "CEC's summary of significant issues" (2004)
  13. "A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities", 35, pp.386~406 (2002)
  14. "Cognitive functioning as measured by the WISC-R Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance?", 36, pp.48~58 (2003)
  15. "What is so special about special education?", pp.1082~1090 (1997)
  16. "Cognitive profiles of reading disability Comparison of discrepancy and low achievement definitions Journal of Educational Psychology", pp.6~23 (1994)
  17. "What is so special about IQ? The limited explanatory power of cognitive abilities in the real world of special education", pp.315~322 (1998), Macmillan
  18. "Physical and psychiatric diagnoses of pupils with mild mental retardation currently being referred for related rervices", 22, pp.221~228 (1987)
  19. "Their use in actual practice", pp.107~114 (1983), Sinclair
  20. "A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.495~500 (1991)
  21. "The relevance of IQ in the determination of learning disabilities Abandoning scores as decision makers Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.500~503 (1989)
  22. "The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training", 41, pp.5~14 (1974)
  23. "Intelligent testing with the WISC-Ⅲ" (1994), Wiley
  24. "What definitions of learning disability say and don't say", 33, pp.239~256 (2000)
  25. "The locus of so-called IQ test results in reading disabilities", 22, pp.507~512 (1989)
  26. "Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability Journal of Learning Disabilities", 33, pp.334~358 (2000)
  27. "The labyrinth of IDEA School decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence", 101, pp.161~174 (1996), MacMillan
  28. "Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches", 28, pp.59~74 (2005)
  29. "Learning disability definitions and criteria used by state education departments", pp.217~232 (1996)
  30. "Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments", pp.141~152 (1990)
  31. "Assessment of learning disabilities The challenge of evaluating the cognitive strategies and processes underlying learning Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities" (1994)
  32. "Does it contribute to an understanding of learning disabilities? Educational Psychology Review", 12(3), pp.315~337 (2000)
  33. "Operationalizing the NJCLD definition of learning disabilities for on-going assessment" (1997)
  34. "The irrelevance of IQ to the definition of learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.434~438 (1991)
  35. "Relationships among rapid digit naming, phonological processing, motor automaticity, and speech perception in poor, average, and good readers and spellers", 38(1), pp.12~28 (2005)
  36. "Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability Results from the Connecticut longitudinal study Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.639~648 (1992)
  37. "IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities", pp.469~478 (1989)
  38. "Why we do not need intelligence test scores in the definition and analyses of learning disabilities", 22, pp.514~518 (1989)
  39. "Development of grammatical sensitivity and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children", pho(logical), pp.28~37 (1988)
  40. "Children and adults with learning disabilities" (1997)
  41. "Effect of attention therapy on reading comprehension", 36(6), pp.556~563 (2003)
  42. "How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts", 17, pp.118~123 (2002)
  43. "Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ Failure to validate discrepancy method Journal of Learning Disabilities", 36(1), pp.24~33 (2003)
  44. "Phenotypic performance profile of Children with reading disabilities A regression based test of the phonological-core difference model Journal of Educational Psychology", pp.24~53 (1994)
  45. "Definition x treatment interaction for students with learning disabilities", 28, pp.644~658 (1999)
  46. "Department of Education Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Office of Special Education Programs" (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

불일치모형과 중재반응모형을 넘어서 : 학습장애의 진단을 위한 새로운 통합 모형의 제안을 중심으로김동일, 정광조한국정서행동장애학회 · 정서·행동장애연구2008 · 제24권 제1호학습장애아동의 진단평가 방안변찬석한국시각장애교육&재활학회 · 시각장애연구2009 · 제25권 제1호RTI와 학습장애, 어떻게 봐야 하나?: 국내 학습장애 이론과 실제에의 시사점이대식한국통합교육학회 · 통합교육연구2008 · 제3권 제2호학습장애의 정의와 진단적 평가기준의 법적 규정을 위한 대안 탐색정대영한국특수아동학회 · 특수아동교육연구2007 · 제9권 제2호미국의 반응중심 중재법 채택이 국내 학습장애 진단평가 정책에 주는 시사점정대영한국특수아동학회 · 특수아동교육연구2010 · 제12권 제2호국내 읽기학습장애 연구의 판별방법 분석안정애한국특수교육문제연구소 · 특수교육저널:이론과 실천2006 · 제7권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

통합 환경에서의 놀이 참여인원에 따른 단계별 놀이프로그램이 자폐장애아동의 교사와의 사회적 상호작용에 미치는 효과김은선, 김미경pp. 1-22정신지체 특수학교 수학교육용 CD-ROM Title의 내용 및 품질 분석김은화pp. 23-41지역 내 협력적 통합교육 프로그램 제공에 필요한 교사 재교육 모형 개발을 위한 실태 조사박혜준, 황복선, 채희태, 박현주, 김형일pp. 43-65난화 활동이 정신지체아동의 도형-배경 변별과 보고 쓰기 오류에 미치는 효과윤희봉, 박재국, 양정미pp. 67-90조음 및 음운장애아동과 일반아동간의 음운인식능력 비교김자경, 김기주, 안성우, 신지현pp. 91-106
원문 보기