마이스터고 육성 정책 성과분석

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the performance of policy for meister school. Performance analysis criteria was developed based on prior studies. It consisted of two categories which are policy making and policy implementation. Policy making category consisted of three elements such as policy environment, policy objectives, decision making structure and policy implementation category consisted of six elements such as selection of eligible schools, building a education system, building a human resource infra, building a physical infra, building a network, building a supporting and managing system. To analyze the performance, it was used research papers, internal data, and interview to persons who related meister school. The major finding of this study were as follows: ① In the policy making category; first, status of internal and external environment were reflected on policy making for meister school. Second, feasibility of policy objectives was so high, but the foreign language education should be enhanced. Third, decision making was effective, but it should be built the cooperative relationship with other functions in the government and office of education. ② In the policy implementation category; first, new education system was effectively built by developing of curriculum and graduates' approval system. Second, human resource infra was built by obtaining the excellent principals, teachers and students, but it should be improved the system for meister teachers. Third, physical infra was effectively built by supporting of funds, facilities and materials from various organizations, but it should be lead to supporting of local governments and industries. Forth, network was effectively built by enhancing the partnership between schools and industries and supporting the career path, but it should be lead to participating of local governments and industries. Fifth, to effectively support of meister schools, center for meister school and consultative groups of policy and practical affairs were established. ③ Developmental directions were suggested; political support and one's own effort to enhance the partnership between schools and industries; improving the system and building a network for supporting the employment of graduates; building a flexible education system and improving the competencies to cope with the demand of industries; building a competitive climate by diversification of supporting agents.