양건식(梁建植) 사상과 문학의 총체성①－인물에 비춰 본 양건식 사상궤적의 윤곽－

Abstract

Baekhwa(白華) Yang Geon-sik(梁建植, 1889~1944) was the back-story of Korean modern literature. Why is Yang Geon-sik still not properly entering Korean modern literature?,Although he was a writer who had already published a remarkable short story in the 1910s, there is no full-length novel except translation, and the stereotype that has been recognized as a Chinese literary translator since the 1910s, not a full-fledged writer, is still strong.,For a bigger reason, I would like to point out the results that I did not pay attention to the Yang Geon-sik idea as a ‘methodological value’ that I tried to counter the ‘violent modernity’ thrown by the West., This study is planned to proceed with two major directions with the aim of restoring the overallity of Yang Geon-sik’s ideas and literature.,1 I will reexamine his ideological value through the ideological trajectory of Yang Kun-sik, and I will pursue it by rediscovering Yang Kun-sik’s literature in the 1910s and dividing it into two progress items.,It is already known that his writing activities have been carried out in various fields, but there has been no mention of his ideological power.,The fact that there were few signs of mentioning Yang Geon-sik in the study of modern discourse in the 1910s and 1930s disproves this.,He was more sensitive to the formation of modern discourse in East Asia and the transition of knowledge field ().,When you read his entire article, you can see that he has revealed his voice precisely in every phase of the times.,This thesis is the first attempt of the research direction, and aims to reevaluate his ideological value through the trajectory of Yang Geon-sik’s thought and to reestablish the position of Yang Geon-sik in our modern literature history.,Since Yang Geon-sik was a back-to-back history of modern Korean literature, he decided to choose a methodology to explore his ideological trajectory through major figures from Korea, China and Japan during the Yang Geon-sik era.