인조 후반~효종 초반 대외전략상의 위기에 대한 검토

Abstract

This is a study that new external strategy was sought after the Manchu War of 1636, and its usefulness in the wake of changes in the internal and external environment such as the diplomatic logic and justification created in the process, such as 備倭論 and 朝․淸和親論, the entry of the Qing Dynasty and the enthronement of Hyojong. And this thesis examines the process of losing and undergoing the process of abolition from the point of view of a crisis in external strategy between the late Injo and early Hyojong. ‘Diplomatic justification that prepare for the provocation of Japan’(備倭論) was embodied in reporting Japan's movements to the Qing Dynasty. The Joseon government was able to form a strategic consensus between Joseon and Qing by delivering the message of threatening Japan's move and maintain independence in policy toward Japan while blocking the link between China and Japan. However, the limitations were revealed as the Qing dynasty took over Beijing, and it was intertwined with the situation in which wariness toward Japan was eased, and the Qing check against the use of anti-Qing personnel after Hyojong's accession. ‘Hiding the real relationship between Joseon and Qing’(朝․淸和親論) was a strategy to conceal from the Japanese side the fact that it had surrendered to the Qing Dynasty after being defeated in the Manchu War of 1636. It was a very clear and incomplete countermeasure, which was practically discarded as the checks on Joseon were eased after Establishment of “Mainland” Qing. The abandonment of the use of this diplomatic strategy, which had achieved certain results in the period after the Manchu War of 1636, led to a crisis in foreign strategy as no new countermeasures emerged after that.