본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수업 대화에서의 청자 소외 양상 분석 - 교사 발화의 응답성 분석을 중심으로 -

Analysis of Listener Alienation in Class Conversation: Focusing on the Answerability Analysis of Teacher Utterance

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study focuses on the answerability of utterance that enables students to actively engage in class, categorizes the answer structure of teacher utterance, and explores the signs of listener alienation in class for each type. Examining the teacher's utterance from the perspectives of “answerability” and “listener alienation” highlights the nature of the conversation and “building a relationship.” It is also significant in that it allows reflection on the existing efficiency-centered teacher speech discourse. In this study, listener alienation was viewed as ‘a state in which the status as an answerer of the teacher's utterances has not been stably granted to an individual, and therefore, she/he neither expects nor forms any ‘educational relationship’ with the teacher in the classroom.’ Based on this concept, the answer structure of the teacher's utterance was categorized and the types of listener alienation that could occur for each type was explored. Primarily, it was confirmed that the answer structure of teacher utterance can be classified into six types. Signs of listener alienation were observed in four types. In view of this, implications for teacher speech were drawn.

Abstract

This study focuses on the answerability of utterance that enables students to actively engage in class, categorizes the answer structure of teacher utterance, and explores the signs of listener alienation in class for each type. Examining the teacher's utterance from the perspectives of “answerability” and “listener alienation” highlights the nature of the conversation and “building a relationship.” It is also significant in that it allows reflection on the existing efficiency-centered teacher speech discourse. In this study, listener alienation was viewed as ‘a state in which the status as an answerer of the teacher's utterances has not been stably granted to an individual, and therefore, she/he neither expects nor forms any ‘educational relationship’ with the teacher in the classroom.’ Based on this concept, the answer structure of the teacher's utterance was categorized and the types of listener alienation that could occur for each type was explored. Primarily, it was confirmed that the answer structure of teacher utterance can be classified into six types. Signs of listener alienation were observed in four types. In view of this, implications for teacher speech were drawn.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 권순희, "초등학교 국어과 수업에 나타난 교사의 질문, 피드백 양상과 개선 방안", 국어교육, (118), pp.65~100 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  2. 고창규, "초등학교 1학년 수업의 참여구조에 관한 연구", 교육인류학연구, 3(1), pp.1~23 (2000)
  3. 박동섭, "바흐친의 대화성 개념을 통한 교실 담화분석의 방향 모색", 교육인류학연구, 11(1), pp.37~72 (2008), 한국교육인류학회[DOI]
  4. 박재현, "국어 교수 화법의 유형적 특성에 관한 분석적 고찰 - 국어교사의 평가", 피드백 발화를 중심으로, 2010, pp.(86), 125~156[DOI]
  5. 박창균, "말하기·듣기 수업의 참여구조 양상 연구-초등학교 4학년 중심으로", 한국초등국어교육, (32), pp.191~218 (2006), 한국초등국어교육학회
  6. 서근원, "학교 혁신의 패러독스: 교민에서 회인으로" (2012), 강현출판사
  7. 서근원, "우리 반 훈이는 수업에서 어떻게 소외되는가?", 교육인류학연구, 17(3), pp.41~102 (2014), 한국교육인류학회[DOI]
  8. 서영진, "국어 수업 대화에서 교사와 학습자의 상호작용 양상", 청람어문교육, (64), pp.7~41 (2017), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
  9. 이창덕, "교사 질문발화와 학생 반응에 대한 교사 피드백 발화 연구, 국어교과교육연구", 국어교과교육연구, 15, pp.177~216 (2008)
  10. 이창덕, "국어 수업대화에서 교사 피드백 방식 분석 연구", 국어교육연구, (66), pp.173~206 (2018), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  11. 이형빈, "학생의 수업참여 및 소외 양상에 대한 현상학적 연구", 교육과정연구, 32(1), pp.25~51 (2014), 한국교육과정학회[DOI]
  12. 정혜승, "교실 소통의 양상과 문제", 화법연구, 9, pp.69~114 (2006)
  13. 조영달, "한국 중등학교 교실수업의 이해" (2001), 교육과학사
  14. 편지윤, "읽기 관여(reading engagement) 개념 정립을 위한 시론", 독서연구, (48), pp.105~132 (2018), 한국독서학회[DOI]
  15. Au, K. H. P., "Cultural congruence in classroom participation structures : Achieving a balance of rights", Discourse Processes, 6(2), pp.145~167 (1983)
  16. Bakhtin, M. M., "Speech genres and other late essays" (1986), University of Texas Press
  17. Bernstein, B., "Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity : Theory, research and critique" (2000), Rowman & Littlefield
  18. Edwards, A., "The language of teaching" (1978), Heinemann
  19. Fredricks, J. A., "School engagement : Potential of the concept, state of the evidence", Review of Educational Research, 74, pp.59~109 (2004)
  20. Shultz, J. J., "Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education", pp.88~123 (1982), Center for Applied Linguistics

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)