본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 교실의 수업 대화 분석 - 교사의 상호작용 촉진 방식을 중심으로 -

The Analysis of Classroom Discourse in KFL class –Focused on teacher’s interaction promoting ways-

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper tried to make clear the factors leading the classroom discourse with the continuous interaction between a teacher and learners focused on smooth communications through the analysis of classroom discourse in KFL(Korean as a Foreign Language) class. It was confirmed again that in order to lead smooth communications in KFL class, the role of the teacher is very important. Among others, it was found that the topic of the class schemed out by the teacher, the aspects of teacher’s response, teacher’s class operation etc affect significantly on the interactions among the participants of the class. It was cleared that regarding the topic of the class, the first important factor affecting the interaction, the selection of it attractive to the learners and the proper alteration of such a topic cause the smooth communication between the teacher and the learners. Next one is the aspect of teacher’s response against the learners’ response after teacher’s initiation to be identified that the teacher’s nonverbal response cause the positive feedback from learners to encourage their desire of speech to lead them to continuous interaction. In addition it was ascertained that the disconnection of the interaction was overcome by helping them in a verbal response with teacher’s provision of various scaffolding for the learners not only to find and correct the errors for themselves but to speak. Lastly the pattern of turn-allocation which is the essential factor for verbal discourse enabling all the learners to participate in the classroom discourse by turning equal allocation to the various learners and adjusting the order of speech with the consideration of learners’ character, was recognized as a way to promote the interaction.

Abstract

This paper tried to make clear the factors leading the classroom discourse with the continuous interaction between a teacher and learners focused on smooth communications through the analysis of classroom discourse in KFL(Korean as a Foreign Language) class. It was confirmed again that in order to lead smooth communications in KFL class, the role of the teacher is very important. Among others, it was found that the topic of the class schemed out by the teacher, the aspects of teacher’s response, teacher’s class operation etc affect significantly on the interactions among the participants of the class. It was cleared that regarding the topic of the class, the first important factor affecting the interaction, the selection of it attractive to the learners and the proper alteration of such a topic cause the smooth communication between the teacher and the learners. Next one is the aspect of teacher’s response against the learners’ response after teacher’s initiation to be identified that the teacher’s nonverbal response cause the positive feedback from learners to encourage their desire of speech to lead them to continuous interaction. In addition it was ascertained that the disconnection of the interaction was overcome by helping them in a verbal response with teacher’s provision of various scaffolding for the learners not only to find and correct the errors for themselves but to speak. Lastly the pattern of turn-allocation which is the essential factor for verbal discourse enabling all the learners to participate in the classroom discourse by turning equal allocation to the various learners and adjusting the order of speech with the consideration of learners’ character, was recognized as a way to promote the interaction.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 고창규, "수업대화 분석틀의 비교 연구-Mehan, Sinclair와 Coulthard, Lemke의 연구를 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6(1), pp.113~144 (2006), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  2. 김재욱, "한국어 수업에서의 교사 발화 연구", 이중언어학, (34), pp.27~48 (2007), 이중언어학회
  3. 朴仙玉, "한국어 교사의 질문 유형과 기능에 대한 연구-외국인에게 한국어를교육하는 교사의 발화를 중심으로-", 화법연구, 5, pp.371~399 (2003)
  4. 박용익, "대화분석(개정 증보판)" (2001), 역락
  5. 박용익, "수업 대화의 분석과 말하기 교육" (2003), 역락
  6. 박재현, "국어 교수 화법의 유형적 특성에 관한 분석적 고찰 - 국어교사의 평가", 피드백 발화를 중심으로, 2010, pp.(86), 125~156[DOI]
  7. 송경숙, "담화화용론" (2003), 한국문화사
  8. 이동은, "한국어 평가담화의 특징", 한국어교육, 13(2), pp.9~204 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
  9. 이진영, "교사의 질문이 한국어 교실에서 교사-학습자간 상호작용에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2007
  10. 진제희, "한국어 학습자들의 의사소통 전략 유형 분류 및 분석(비상호적 상황을 중심으로)", 한국어 교육, 11(1), pp.175~199 (2000)
  11. 진제희, "상호 작용 상황에서 나타난 한국어 학습자들의 의사소통 전략 양상", 이중언어학, 17(1), pp.339~358 (2000)
  12. 진제희, "교실 상호작용에서 나타난 교사의 역할", 한국어교육, 13(1), pp.11~264 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
  13. 진제희, "사회언어학적 및 전략적 말하기 능력 배양을 위한 담화분석 방법의 적용", 한국어교육, 14(1), pp.13~323 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
  14. 진제희, "한국어 교실 구두 상호작용에 나타난 문제 해결을 위한 의미 협상 : 교사-학습자 대화를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2004
  15. 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구", 이중언어학, (28), pp.371~390 (2005), 이중언어학회
  16. 진제희, "(외국인을 위한 한국어)수업 대화 분석" (2006), 커뮤니케이션북스
  17. 한상미, "외국어로서의 한국어 교육에서 교사말 연구 : 상호작용 기능에 따른 유형을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2001
  18. 한상미, "한국어 교실에서 나타난 교사의 피드백 유형 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 25(1), pp.453~505 (2001), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  19. 허문영, "한국어 말하기 인터뷰 시험의 상호작용 분석 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  20. 홍종명, "한국어 수업 의미협상(negotiation of meaning) 과정에서 나타난 문제발생 표지(indicator) 연구", 언어와 문화, 5(3), pp.345~362 (2009), 한국언어문화교육학회
  21. Bruner, J., "The role of dialogue in language acquisition, In The Child’s concept of Language" (1978), Springer-Verlag
  22. Brown, H. D., "원리에 의한 교수: 언어 교육에의 상호작용적 접근법(Teaching by Principles : An Interactive Approach toLanguage Pedagogy(3rd ed.)" (2008), 피어슨에듀케이션코리아
  23. Chaudron, C., "Second language classroom : Research on teaching and learning" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  24. Greenfield, P., "A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life, In Everyday cognition", pp.117~138 (1984), Harvard University Press
  25. Hugh, Mehan, "Learning lessons : Social organization in the classroom" (1979), Harvard University Press
  26. Jefferson, G., "Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation, In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction", pp.219~248 (1978), Academic Press
  27. Kumaravadivelu, B., "Maximizing learning potential in the communicative classroom", ELT JOURNAL, 47(1), pp.12~21 (1993)
  28. Lemke, J. L., "Talking science : Language, learning and values" (1990), Ablex Publishing
  29. Lier, L. V., "Analiysing interaction in second language classroom", ELT JOURNAL, 38(3), pp.160~169 (1984)
  30. Malamah-Thomas, A., "Classroom Interaction" (1987), Oxford University Press
  31. Richards, J. C, "Approches and methods in language teaching(2nd ed.)" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  32. 김종현, "말이 열리는 교실" (2011), 학이시습
  33. Sinclair, J. M., "Toward an analysis of discourse : The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
  34. Vigil, N. A., "Rule fossilization: a tentative model", Language Learning, 26(2), pp.281~295 (1976)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)