본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Teacher discourse and students’ participation

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Despite the growing interest in teacher evaluation in Korea, not much is known about how teachers use classroom discourse to scaffold student learning during class. This study was designed to examine the interactional architecture of classroom discourse both quantitatively and qualitatively and present a possible evaluation model of teacher classroom discourse applicable to current Korean educational settings. Findings were summarized in three: (1)although there was no big difference between the numbers of teacher and student turns, the teacher produced much more words in each turn, (2) the primary pattern of teacher discourse was identified as questions, and (3)because most of teacher questions were at lower cognitive complexity levels,such questions seem to fail to provide students with opportunities to construct their thoughts for responding to the questions, and elicited less students’participation. Through the analysis of the highly teacher-centered class, we found that teacher-centered discourse may negatively affect students’ ways of thinking and participation. Pedagogical implications and limitations are also presented in this paper.

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in teacher evaluation in Korea, not much is known about how teachers use classroom discourse to scaffold student learning during class. This study was designed to examine the interactional architecture of classroom discourse both quantitatively and qualitatively and present a possible evaluation model of teacher classroom discourse applicable to current Korean educational settings. Findings were summarized in three: (1)although there was no big difference between the numbers of teacher and student turns, the teacher produced much more words in each turn, (2) the primary pattern of teacher discourse was identified as questions, and (3)because most of teacher questions were at lower cognitive complexity levels,such questions seem to fail to provide students with opportunities to construct their thoughts for responding to the questions, and elicited less students’participation. Through the analysis of the highly teacher-centered class, we found that teacher-centered discourse may negatively affect students’ ways of thinking and participation. Pedagogical implications and limitations are also presented in this paper.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Alexander, R., "Towards dialogic teaching. Rethinking classroom talk (2nd ed.)" (2004), Dialogues
  2. Applebee, A., "Discussion Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English", American Education Research Journal, 40(3), pp.685~730 (2003)
  3. Bakhtin, M. M., "The dialogic imagination: Four essays" (1981), University of Texas Press
  4. Bloom, B. S., "Taxonomy of educational objectives, In Handbook I: Cognitive domain" (1956), McKay
  5. Cazden, C. B., "Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning" (1988), Heinemann
  6. Dillon, L. T., "The remedial status of student questioning", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), pp.197~210 (1988)
  7. Donato, R., "Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.27~50 (2000), Oxford University Press
  8. Drew, P., "Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  9. Ellis, A. B., "A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), pp.221~262 (2007)
  10. Greenleaf, C., "Linking classroom discourse and classroom content: Following the trail of intellectual work in a writing lesson", Discourse Processes, 16, pp.465~505 (1993)
  11. Heritage, J., "Garfinkel and ethnomethodology" (1984), Polity Press
  12. Kogut, G., "Teacher talk, pedagogical talk and classroom activities", Paper presented at the 3rd Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference (2009)
  13. Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning and values" (1990), Ablex
  14. A coding scheme for the analysis of classroom discourse in Singapore Schools, "Luke A.", Center for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, ~ (2005)
  15. Matusov, E., "Schooling as cultural process: Shared thinking and guidance by children from schools differing in collaborative practices, In Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 29", pp.129~160 (2002), Academic Press
  16. Mehan, H., "Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom" (1979), Harvard University Press
  17. Myhill, D., "Talking, listening, learning. Effective talk in the primary classroom" (2006), Open University Press
  18. Nathan, M. J., "To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), pp.525~565 (2007)
  19. 김수연, "Regulation of Teacher Elicitations in the Mathematics Classroom", COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 27(2), pp.91~120 (2009), LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC-TAYLOR FRANCIS
  20. Nystand, M., "Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation, In Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom", pp.1~29 (1997), Teacher’s College Press
  21. Nystrand, M., "Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom" (1997), Teachers College Press
  22. Richards, J. C., "Approaches and methods in language teaching" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  23. Schegloff. E. A., "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 8(4), pp.289~327 (1973)
  24. Seedhouse. P., "The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective" (2005), Blackwell
  25. Sfard, A., "When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: The case of a class learning about negative numbers", Journal of the Learning Science, 16(4), pp.565~613 (2007)
  26. Sinclair, J. M., "Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
  27. Swain, M., "The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue, In Sociocultural theory and second language learning", pp.97~114 (2000), Oxford University Press
  28. Takahashi, E., "Social interaction and language development in a FLES classroom, In Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction", pp.139~159 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
  29. Verplaetse, L. S., "Mr. Wonderful: Portrait of a dialogic teacher, In Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction", pp.221~242 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
  30. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  31. Yip, D. Y., "Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction", Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), pp.76~83 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)