秦․漢時代의 ‘庶人’ 再論
The Review of ‘Shu Ren(庶人)’ in the Qin(秦)-Han(漢) Dynasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, Mr. Joong Hyuk Im 任仲爀 defined the Characteristic and the general idea about Shi Wu and Shu Ren that Qin秦 and Han’s 漢 rank of nobility is “the system that was converged into Shi Wu士伍”. However, I felt that we should face this problem from different point of view. Particularly, Mr. Joong Hyuk Im understands the Shu Ren 庶人 by a part of ‘the system’ but I think there is a limitation to grasp of characteristic and its transition by his point of view. To understand the actual condition about Shi Wu from Qin and Han’s dynasties, We should examine the content from Sui Hu Di Qin Bamboo Manuscripts. The similar substance of Shi Wu from the above is existing on the grave which was founded from west side in Qinshihuang. It is written that a person who has noble title is resting there. People were even died because of the hard laboring. There was any chance that a person who has noble title could have reduction. It is very hard to find the character of Shu Ren. Mr. Sinaichikou 椎名一雄 said that Shu Ren 庶人 is similar to the Qi Koe Shi 七科讁 people who were excepted in military service and the corvee. However, I think that Shu Ren and Qi Ke Shi are different. Actually, I think that Shu Zi 庶子 from Shang Ju Shu Jing Nei 商君書 境內 is more similar to the Shu Ren庶人. From Shang Jun Shu Jing Nei 商君書 境內, we can find out that if someone catches an enemy they get certain amount of farm land, house and also a Shu Zi 庶子. This Shu Zi is different than a slave in private employ because Shu Zi only works for a six days per a month. The legal text of year 2 does not mention about giving a salve to the people of noble title. If the farm land and house land were given by the level of noble title, people need many slaves to work for them. As the noble title was higher, they had more farm land or house so they needed many slave to work for them. I think Shu Zi did not have a noble title and it was a Shu Ren. The thing that they provided a laboring to a person who has noble title was a sign that Shu Ren was the corvee of a person under Jing Tian Zhi. On the book the legal text of year 2 shows us about Shu Ren, they seemed like they were subordinated. From The legal text of year 2 has a example about releasing the slave in private employ and make him as a Shu Ren. This example shows us the characteristic of Shu Ren clearly. His owner makes his slaves to be free, that does not mean that they will be free forever. If they do make a problem or do crime they are going to slave. Therefore even though the owner frees his slave to go and the slave becomes a Si Shu or a Shu Ren, it was conditionally free. The thing is even though the owner let the slave become a Shu Ren 庶人, the slave is still belongs to the owner. More interesting thing is if the slave becomes a Si Shu or a Shu Ren, they were discharged with a laboring and paying head tax. This is same case with that Shu Ren who are excluded from the age law in legal text of year 2 and Shu Ren who was excepted from the corvee and military service.
Abstract
Recently, Mr. Joong Hyuk Im 任仲爀 defined the Characteristic and the general idea about Shi Wu and Shu Ren that Qin秦 and Han’s 漢 rank of nobility is “the system that was converged into Shi Wu士伍”. However, I felt that we should face this problem from different point of view. Particularly, Mr. Joong Hyuk Im understands the Shu Ren 庶人 by a part of ‘the system’ but I think there is a limitation to grasp of characteristic and its transition by his point of view. To understand the actual condition about Shi Wu from Qin and Han’s dynasties, We should examine the content from Sui Hu Di Qin Bamboo Manuscripts. The similar substance of Shi Wu from the above is existing on the grave which was founded from west side in Qinshihuang. It is written that a person who has noble title is resting there. People were even died because of the hard laboring. There was any chance that a person who has noble title could have reduction. It is very hard to find the character of Shu Ren. Mr. Sinaichikou 椎名一雄 said that Shu Ren 庶人 is similar to the Qi Koe Shi 七科讁 people who were excepted in military service and the corvee. However, I think that Shu Ren and Qi Ke Shi are different. Actually, I think that Shu Zi 庶子 from Shang Ju Shu Jing Nei 商君書 境內 is more similar to the Shu Ren庶人. From Shang Jun Shu Jing Nei 商君書 境內, we can find out that if someone catches an enemy they get certain amount of farm land, house and also a Shu Zi 庶子. This Shu Zi is different than a slave in private employ because Shu Zi only works for a six days per a month. The legal text of year 2 does not mention about giving a salve to the people of noble title. If the farm land and house land were given by the level of noble title, people need many slaves to work for them. As the noble title was higher, they had more farm land or house so they needed many slave to work for them. I think Shu Zi did not have a noble title and it was a Shu Ren. The thing that they provided a laboring to a person who has noble title was a sign that Shu Ren was the corvee of a person under Jing Tian Zhi. On the book the legal text of year 2 shows us about Shu Ren, they seemed like they were subordinated. From The legal text of year 2 has a example about releasing the slave in private employ and make him as a Shu Ren. This example shows us the characteristic of Shu Ren clearly. His owner makes his slaves to be free, that does not mean that they will be free forever. If they do make a problem or do crime they are going to slave. Therefore even though the owner frees his slave to go and the slave becomes a Si Shu or a Shu Ren, it was conditionally free. The thing is even though the owner let the slave become a Shu Ren 庶人, the slave is still belongs to the owner. More interesting thing is if the slave becomes a Si Shu or a Shu Ren, they were discharged with a laboring and paying head tax. This is same case with that Shu Ren who are excluded from the age law in legal text of year 2 and Shu Ren who was excepted from the corvee and military service.
참고문헌 (49)
- 尾形勇, "良賤制の形成とその展開", 岩波講座世界歷史, 5 (1970)
- 好並隆司, "漢代下層庶人の存在形態(二)", 史學雜誌, 82(2) (1973)
- 堀敏一, "中國における良·賤身分制の成立過程, In 中國古代の身分制" (1987), 汲古書院
- 川本芳昭, "北魏時代における所謂良奴制の成立-良の問題を中心として-", 史學雜誌, 97(7) (1987)
- 林炳德, "中國古代의 奴婢와 刑徒", 忠北史學, 3 (1990)
- 林炳德, "魏晉南北朝의 良賤制", 歷史學報, 142 (1994)
- 椎名一雄, "張家山漢簡二年律令に見える爵制-庶人の理解を中心として", 鴨台史學, 6 (2006)
- 曹旅寧, "秦漢法律簡牘中的 “庶人”身分及法律地位問題", 咸陽師範學院學報, 22(3) (2007)
- 鷹取祐司, "秦漢時代の刑罰と爵制的身分制", 立命館文學, 608 (2008)
- 임중혁, "秦漢律의 耐刑 ― 士伍로의 수렴 시스템과 관련하여 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (19), pp.103~178 (2008), 중국고중세사학회
- 임병덕, "秦 · 漢時代의 士伍와 庶人", 중국고중세사연구, 20(20), pp.325~376 (2008), 중국고중세사학회
- 임중혁, "秦漢律의 庶人", 중국고중세사연구, (22), pp.163~234 (2009), 중국고중세사학회
- 박건주, "秦漢 법제상의 「刑盡者」ㆍ「免隸臣妾」과 公卒ㆍ士伍ㆍ庶人", 중국학보, (58), pp.201~228 (2008), 한국중국학회
- 林炳德, "秦漢時期的庶人", 簡帛硏究 (2011)
- 김경호, "秦・漢初 行書律의 內容과 地方統治", 史叢(사총), (73), pp.103~150 (2011), 역사연구소
- 김병준, "장가산한간 <이년율령>의 출토위치와 편련 - 서사 과정의 복원을 겸하여", 인문논총, (65), pp.221~266 (2011), 인문학연구원
- 윤재석, "秦․漢初의 戶籍制度", 중국고중세사연구, (26), pp.61~118 (2011), 중국고중세사학회
- 이명화, "秦漢 女性 刑罰의 減刑과 勞役", 중국고중세사연구, (25), pp.57~99 (2011), 중국고중세사학회
- 임병덕, "出土文獻에 보이는 秦漢 시기의 土地制度 -法的 規定과 그 實際 및 授田制의 變化-", 중국사연구, (75), pp.1~31 (2011), 중국사학회
- 임중혁, "漢初의 律令 제정과 田宅制度", 중국고중세사연구, (25), pp.101~151 (2011), 중국고중세사학회
- 임중혁, "秦始皇 31年의 自實田", 중국고중세사연구, (26), pp.1~60 (2011), 중국고중세사학회
- 朱漢民, "嶽麓書院藏秦簡(壹)" (2010), 上海辭書出版社
- 朱漢民, "嶽麓書院藏秦簡(貳)" (2011), 上海辭書出版社
- 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "里耶秦簡(壹)" (2012), 文物出版社
- 陳偉, "里耶秦簡牘校釋(第一卷)" (2012), 武漢大學出版社
- 임중혁, "秦漢律의 庶人", 중국고중세사연구, 22(22), pp.163~234 (2009), 중국고중세사학회
- 鷹取祐司, "秦漢時代の刑罰と爵制的身分制", 立命館文學, 608, pp.104~ (2008)
- 임중혁, "秦漢律의 庶人", 중국고중세사연구, (22), pp.163~234 (2009), 중국고중세사학회
- 山田勝芳, "漢代の算と役", 東北大學敎養部紀要, 28 (1978)
- 楠山修作, "漢代女性力役不課論, In 中國史論集" (2001), 朋友書店
- 山田勝芳, "前漢武帝代の地域社會と女性徭役-安徽省天長市安樂鎭九十號漢墓 木牘から考える-", 集刊東洋學, 97, pp.3~ (2007)
- 鷲尾祐子, "出土文字にみえる秦漢代戶籍制度-湖北省里耶古城出土秦名籍と江 蘇省天長縣出土戶口簿․筭賦-", 東亞文史論叢, pp.36~37 (2007), 東亞歷史文化硏究會
- "江陵張家山漢墓出土‘二年律令‘譯注稿(2)", 東方學報, 77, pp.10~ (2004)
- 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組, "張家山漢墓竹簡〔二四七號墓〕(釋文修訂 本)", pp.26~ (2006), 文物出版社
- 冨谷至, "江陵張家山二四七號墓出土漢律令の硏究(論考篇·譯注篇)", pp.81~ (2006), 朋友書店
- 彭浩, "二年律令與奏讞書-張家山二四七號漢墓出土法 律文獻釋讀", pp.142~ (2007), 上海古籍出版社
- 專修大學二年律令硏究會, "張家山漢簡二年律令譯注(三) -具律-", 專修史學, 37, pp.178~ (2004)
- 張榮强, "二年律令與漢代課役身分", 中國史硏究, pp.33~34 (2005)
- 王彥輝, "從張家山漢簡看西漢時期私奴婢的社會地位", 東北師大學報(哲學社會科學版, pp.18~ (2003)
- 袁延勝, "天長紀莊木牘《算簿》與漢代算賦問題", 中國史研究, pp.111~112 (2008)
- 王愛淸, "試論張家山漢簡中的“私屬”", 烏魯木齊職 業大學學報, 13(2), pp.58~59 (2004)
- 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "里耶秦簡(壹)" (2012), 文物出版社
- 張春龍, "里耶秦簡中戶籍和人口管理記錄, In 里耶古城․秦簡與秦文化硏究" (2009), 科學出版社
- 椎名一雄, "邊境漢簡にみられる爵位事例への一考察", 大正大學大學院硏究論集, 34, pp.1~3 (2010)
- 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "里耶發掘報告", pp.185~190 (2007), 岳麓書社
- 曹旅寧, "秦漢法律簡牘中的“庶人”身分及法律地位問題", 咸陽師範學院學報, 22(3), pp.14~ (2007)
- 윤재석, "수호지진묘죽간 역주", pp.379~ (2010), 소명출판사
- 林炳德, "출토문헌과 漢文帝의 刑制改革, In 동양사 1", pp.58~ (2007), 책세상
- 임병덕, "秦漢 交替期의 奴婢", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.175~226 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
