An Overview of Children’s Source Monitoring Ⅱ: Focused on the Characteristics of Sources, Source Judgment, and Individual Differences
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is aimed to offer a comprehensive overview of research on children’s source monitoring (SM), exploring significant factors known to impact children’s SM focused on the context of children’s testimony. The discussion was mainly presented the results of applied and experimental studies of children’s SM. The ultimate goal of this review is to build a beneficial synthesis of currently available and relevant information concerning children’s SM process and ability, thereby producing a reliable and concise interpretation that classifies important areas for potential future research of children’s testimony. Various factors may influence children’s SM; however, this overview was concentrated on, in particular, critical characteristics of the sources, the source judgment processes, and the individual differences within the context of children’s testimony. The experimental research and implied conclusions criticized herein proposed a groundwork and theoretical perspective for potential state-of-the-art empirical studies in this research field. It is hopeful that these imperative and extensive knowledge can be incorporated into practical legal settings in children’s lives and well-being.
Abstract
This paper is aimed to offer a comprehensive overview of research on children’s source monitoring (SM), exploring significant factors known to impact children’s SM focused on the context of children’s testimony. The discussion was mainly presented the results of applied and experimental studies of children’s SM. The ultimate goal of this review is to build a beneficial synthesis of currently available and relevant information concerning children’s SM process and ability, thereby producing a reliable and concise interpretation that classifies important areas for potential future research of children’s testimony. Various factors may influence children’s SM; however, this overview was concentrated on, in particular, critical characteristics of the sources, the source judgment processes, and the individual differences within the context of children’s testimony. The experimental research and implied conclusions criticized herein proposed a groundwork and theoretical perspective for potential state-of-the-art empirical studies in this research field. It is hopeful that these imperative and extensive knowledge can be incorporated into practical legal settings in children’s lives and well-being.
참고문헌 (45)
- Ackerman, B. P., "The sources of children's source errors in judging causal inferences", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, pp.90~119 (1992)
- Ackerman, B. P., "Children’s source errors in referential communication", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, pp.432~464 (1994)
- Bink, M. L., "An alternative conceptualization to memory “strength” in reality monitoring", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), pp.804~809 (1999)
- Brainerd, C. J., "Gist is the grist : Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism", Developmental Review, 10, pp.3~47 (1990)
- Ceci, S. J., "Suggestibility of the children’s witness : An historical review and synthesis", Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), pp.403~439 (1993)
- Ceci, S. J., "Jeopardy in the courtroom" (1995), American Psychological Association
- Ceci, S. J., "The Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol 4", pp.714~774 (1998)
- Ceci, S. J., "Repeatedly thinking about a non-event : source misattributions among preschoolers", Consciousness and Cognition, 3, pp.388~401 (1994)
- Ceci, S. J., "Children’ s eyewitness testimony", pp.79~91 (1987), Springer
- Connolly, D. A., "Children’s suggestibility for an instance of a repeated event versus a unique event : The effect of degree of association between variable options", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, pp.207~223 (2006)
- Day, K., "The role of similarity in developmental differences in source monitoring", British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, pp.219~232 (1998)
- Dodson, C. S., "On the recollection of specific and partial-source information", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(5), pp.1121~1136 (1998)
- Foley, M. A., "Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions : A developmental comparison", Child Development, 56(5), pp.1145~1155 (1985)
- Foley, M. A., "Developmental comparisons of explicit versus implicit imagery and reality monitoring", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51(1), pp.1~13 (1991)
- Foley, M. A., "Developmental comparisons of the ability to discriminate between memories for symbolic play enactments", Developmental Psychology, 30(2), pp.206~217 (1994)
- Foley, M. A., "Age-related confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech", Child Development, 54, pp.51~60 (1983)
- Hoffman, H. G., "Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23(2), pp.371~383 (1997)
- Jacoby, L. L., "A process dissociation framework : Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory", Journal of Memory and Language, 30, pp.513~541 (1991)
- Johnson, M. K., "The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice", Memory & Cognition, 16, pp.337~342 (1988)
- Johnson, M. K., "Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 117, pp.371~376 (1988)
- Johnson, M. K., "Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), pp.1409~1419 (1994)
- Johnson, M. K., "Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring", American Journal of Psychology, 94, pp.37~64 (1981)
- Lane, S. M., "Dividing attention during a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, pp.199~212 (2006)
- Lee, S., "An overview of theory and research of source monitoring in children’s testimony context", Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2(3), pp.199~215 (2011)
- Lindsay, D. S., "Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses’ ability to remember event details", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), pp.1077~1083 (1990)
- Lindsay, D. S., "The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source", Memory & Cognition, 17(3), pp.349~358 (1989)
- Lindsay, D. S., "Memory and testimony in child witnesses", pp.86~108 (1995), Sag
- Lindsay, D. S., "Developmental changes in memory source monitoring", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52(3), pp.297~318 (1991)
- Markham, R., "Development of reality monitoring for performed and imagined actions", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, pp.1347~1354 (1991)
- Markham, R., "The effect of vividness of imagery on reality monitoring", Journal of Mental Imagery, 17, pp.159~170 (1993)
- Marks, D. F., "Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures", British Journal of Psychology, 64, pp.17~24 (1973)
- Marsh, R. L., "Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions", Memory, 14, pp.148~160 (2006)
- Newcombe, P. A., "Where to look first for suggestibility in young children", Cognition, 59(3), pp.337~356 (1996)
- Parker, J. F., "Age differences in source monitoring of performed and imagined actions on immediate and delayed tests", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, pp.84~101 (1995)
- Perner, J., "Understanding the representational mind" (1991), MIT Press
- Poole, D. A., "Interviewing preschoolers : Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), pp.129~154 (1995)
- Roberts, K. P., "Children’s discriminations of actual and pretend actions in a hiding game", British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, pp.321~333 (1995)
- Robinson, E. J, "Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development" (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Robinson, E. J, "Children's Source Monitoring", pp.355~381 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Ass
- Snodgrass, J. G., "A standardized set of 260 pictures : Norms for name agreement, familiarity and visual complexity", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning & Memory, 6, pp.174~215 (1980)
- Spaniol, J., "When Is Schematic Knowledge Used in Source Monitoring?", Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), pp.631~651 (2002)
- Taylor, M., "Children’s understanding of knowledge acquisition : The tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned", Child Development, 65, pp.1581~1604 (1994)
- Thierry, K. L., "Children’s source monitoring", pp.171~196 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Welch-Ross, M. K., "Young children’s understanding of conflicting mental representation predicts suggestibility", Developmental Psychology, 33, pp.43~53 (1997)
- Zaragoza, M. S., "Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), pp.934~945 (1994)