중국 학창(鶴氅)의 형성과 전개 과정에 관한 연구
A study on the formation and development of Hakchang in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The crane was recognized as a symbol of longevity and a riding bird of immortals in China, and this symbolism developed the crane from a feather-winged robe. Hakchang is a costume that symbolizes the desire to sprout wings and fly to the sky and the symbol of a crane flying freely in the sky, escaping from the world. Hakchang appeared with the establishment of Taoism during the Wei, Jin, Southern, and Northern Dynasties. In the early form, there was a short-length shawl made of bird feathers and worn over the shoulder and a rectangular-shaped shawl made of fabric. Fabric shawl is the original form of Hakchang and was an essential element of the Taoist dress code. During the Tang and Song Dynasties, along with the secularization of Taoism, Hakchang was expanded into three types: rectangular-shaped Hakchang, wide-sleeve Hakchang, and Hakchang with crane patterns, and continued until the Ming Dynasty. Three types of Hakchang were worn as Taoist robes and mourning clothes in the Ming Dynasty. Wide-sleeved Hakchang was widely worn by the public regardless of social status, age, and gender, as it was used interchangeably with the name Changui. Until the middle of the 18th century in the Qing Dynasty, Hakchang was used interchangeably with Changui as a term meaning Dubong. Around the 19th century, Changui changed to a terminology referring to Manchu women's daily overcoats. In the Qing Dynasty, there is no trace that Hakchang was used as a term for Taoist clothing. Hakchang appeared as clothing for the public, showing an aspect that deviated from religiosity. Chinese Hakchang began with 'clothes made of feathers of birds' and gradually expanded their meanings, diversifying their types. The rectangular-shaped Hakchang was inherited from the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties to the Qing Dynasty, and it solidified its position as a Taoist robe for a long time.
Abstract
The crane was recognized as a symbol of longevity and a riding bird of immortals in China, and this symbolism developed the crane from a feather-winged robe. Hakchang is a costume that symbolizes the desire to sprout wings and fly to the sky and the symbol of a crane flying freely in the sky, escaping from the world. Hakchang appeared with the establishment of Taoism during the Wei, Jin, Southern, and Northern Dynasties. In the early form, there was a short-length shawl made of bird feathers and worn over the shoulder and a rectangular-shaped shawl made of fabric. Fabric shawl is the original form of Hakchang and was an essential element of the Taoist dress code. During the Tang and Song Dynasties, along with the secularization of Taoism, Hakchang was expanded into three types: rectangular-shaped Hakchang, wide-sleeve Hakchang, and Hakchang with crane patterns, and continued until the Ming Dynasty. Three types of Hakchang were worn as Taoist robes and mourning clothes in the Ming Dynasty. Wide-sleeved Hakchang was widely worn by the public regardless of social status, age, and gender, as it was used interchangeably with the name Changui. Until the middle of the 18th century in the Qing Dynasty, Hakchang was used interchangeably with Changui as a term meaning Dubong. Around the 19th century, Changui changed to a terminology referring to Manchu women's daily overcoats. In the Qing Dynasty, there is no trace that Hakchang was used as a term for Taoist clothing. Hakchang appeared as clothing for the public, showing an aspect that deviated from religiosity. Chinese Hakchang began with 'clothes made of feathers of birds' and gradually expanded their meanings, diversifying their types. The rectangular-shaped Hakchang was inherited from the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties to the Qing Dynasty, and it solidified its position as a Taoist robe for a long time.
참고문헌 (49)
- 劉向, "列仙傳", pp.71~ (2011), 지식을 만드는 지식
- "藝文類聚卷78 靈異部上仙道"[URL]
- 이연순, "16세기 중반 詠鶴詩에 나타난 鶴의 의미 연구 - 「次玉堂失鶴韻」을 중심으로", 韓國古典硏究, (35), pp.223~256 (2016), 한국고전연구학회[DOI]
- 김혜란, "조선 후기 학창의 연구", 한복문화, 25(3), pp.5~22 (2022), 한복문화학회
- 周思源, "试述"羽衣"的文化内涵", 民闾文化论坛, 90 (2011)[DOI]
- 王惠莹, "鶴氅名物考证及其宗敎性和世俗化思考", 宗敎信仰与民族文化, 15, pp.135~146 (2021)
- 張默涵, "氅衣造型的演化与文化含义探析", 长沙大学学报, 30(4), pp.122~125 (2016)
- 周岭, "《红楼梦》中薛宝钗的鹤氅", 文學與文化, 2, pp.113~118 (2021)[DOI]
- 杨琳, "《红楼梦》“洋线番羓丝的鹤氅”解证", 红楼梦學刊, 3, pp.328~338 (2022)
- 高春明, "中國服饰名物考", pp.254~ (2001), 上海文化出版社
- "史記本紀卷20 孝武本紀"[URL]
- "晉書列傳卷"[URL]
- 牟鐘鑒, "중국 도교사: 신선을꿈꾼사람들의이야기", pp.82~ (2015), 예문서원
- 常盤大定, "중국의 불교와 유교도교. 하", pp.89~ (2021), 세창출판사
- 李松, "中国道教美術史 : 漢魏晋南北朝篇", pp.198~ (2022), 勉誠社
- "北京古宮博物院"[URL]
- 董海斌, "宋代道教服饰制度初探", 道教研究, 2, pp.70~ (2020)
- 戴耕, "中国古代文人隐士制道服而衣的风尚及精神情怀", 裝饰, 109 (2009)[DOI]
- 任榮子, "道敎服飾小考", 道敎文化硏究, 2, pp.363~ (1988)
- "太平御覽道部17 冠"[URL]
- "Museum of Fine Arts Boston"[URL]
- 吴羽, "唐宋世俗人士穿着道服考", 晋阳学刊, 5, pp.88~ (2009)
- 김지현, "도교의 정전화 - 모델 내러티브와 의례화를 중심으로 -", 한국사상사학, (55), pp.205~246 (2017), 한국사상사학회
- "上海博物館"[URL]
- Stephen Little, "Taoism and the arts of China", pp.175~ (2000), Art Institute of Chicago
- "北京古宮博物院"[URL]
- 张振谦, "北宋文人士大夫穿道服现象论析", 世界宗敎硏究, 4, pp.95~96 (2010)
- "上海博物館"[URL]
- "舊五代史列傳卷67 盧程"[URL]
- "北京古宮博物院"[URL]
- 檀國大學校東洋學硏究所, "漢韓大辭典7", pp.1024~ (2004), 檀國大學校出版部
- 撷芳主人, "大明衣冠图志", pp.304~ (2016), 北京大學出版社
- "蒙韃備錄婦女"[URL]
- 王国维, "王國維遺書8", pp.187~ (1983), 上海書店出版社
- "宋史列傳"[URL]
- 王利民, "金代阎德源墓的研究与审视", 文物天地, 11, pp.109~ (2019)
- 上海市紅樓夢學會, "紅樓夢鑑賞辭典" (1988), 上海古籍出版社
- "金甁梅"[URL]
- "British Museum"[URL]
- "金甁梅潘金蓮摳打如意兒王三官義拜西門慶"[URL]
- "台北故宮博物院"[URL]
- 周保錫, "中國古代服飾史", pp.265~ (1984), 中國戏剧出版社
- 黎姗姗, "清代天仙洞衣特征研究", 碩士, pp.2020
- 黃能馥, "중국의 비단역사 칠천년 : 역대직조와 자수품 연구", pp.432~ (2017), 한국학술정보
- "紅樓夢"[URL]
- 范蓉, "晩淸滿族氅衣文化硏究", 硕士, pp.2018
- "北京古宮博物院"[URL]
- 殷安妮, "晚清宫廷氅衣与衬衣异同比较及其工艺释析", 艺术设计研究, 2, pp.38~ (2014)
- 단국대학교 동양학연구소, "漢韓大辭典6", pp.344~ (2003), 檀國大學校出版部
