의외성에 대한 대안적 고찰 : 한국어를 바탕으로
A Note on the Mirativity in Other Views Based on Korean.
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Jeong, Haegwon. 2018. A Note on the Mirativity in Other Views Based on Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43-1, 129-152. Mirativity was proposed by DeLancey(1997) as an independent semantic and grammatical category that represents new or unexpected information. However previous definitions of mirativity have some limitations and cause misunderstanding, so it is redescribed as 'a state between proposition and integrated knowledge' for this study. Three attributes and their values are proposed, i) correlativity between the expectation of .integrated knowledge and the contents of proposition, ii) immediacy which is interval between realization and utterance, and iii) objectivity in utterances or narratives oriented to the speaker, the listener, or the audience. They are mutually exclusive dimensions of mirativity. Thus, it is confirmed that mirativity is an independent grammatical category and is distinguished from other related categories, such as exclamative, evidentiality, and epistemic modality. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
Abstract
Jeong, Haegwon. 2018. A Note on the Mirativity in Other Views Based on Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 43-1, 129-152. Mirativity was proposed by DeLancey(1997) as an independent semantic and grammatical category that represents new or unexpected information. However previous definitions of mirativity have some limitations and cause misunderstanding, so it is redescribed as 'a state between proposition and integrated knowledge' for this study. Three attributes and their values are proposed, i) correlativity between the expectation of .integrated knowledge and the contents of proposition, ii) immediacy which is interval between realization and utterance, and iii) objectivity in utterances or narratives oriented to the speaker, the listener, or the audience. They are mutually exclusive dimensions of mirativity. Thus, it is confirmed that mirativity is an independent grammatical category and is distinguished from other related categories, such as exclamative, evidentiality, and epistemic modality. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
참고문헌 (28)
- 구현정, "반영적 경청에 쓰이는 ‘-구나’의 담화기능", 어문학연구, 4, pp.49~72 (1995)
- 권익수, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미 재고찰: 정경숙(2012)에 대한 다른 생각", 언어, 38(1), pp.53~66 (2013), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 박재연, "한국어 어미 결합에서 나타나는 비합성적 의미 해석", 언어와 정보 사회, 26, pp.215~250 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 송재목, "한국어 ‘증거성’ 종결어미 ‘-네’: 정경숙(2007, 2012)에 대한 대답", 언어, 39(4), pp.819~850 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 송재목, "의외성(mirative)에 대하여: 독립된 문법범주 설정의 문제점을 중심으로", 언어, 41(4), pp.593~617 (2016), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 장경현, "국어 문장 종결부의 문체" (2010), 역락
- 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서", 언어, 37(4), pp.995~1016 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 조민영, "한국어 교육을 위한 표현문형 ‘-는 것이다'의 담화기능 연구: 문법화를 통해 획득한 양태 의미를 바탕으로", 석사, pp.2017
- 진관초, "한국어 의외성 표지 ‘-다니’에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.91~126 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y, "The essence of mirativity", Linguistic Typology, 16(3), pp.435~486 (2012)
- Akatsuka, Noriko, "Conditionals and the Epistemic Scale", Language, 61(3), pp.625~639 (1985)
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y, "The essence of mirativity", Typology, 16, pp.435~485 (2012)
- DeLancey, Scott, "Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information", Linguistic Typology, 1, pp.33~52 (1997)
- DeLancey, Scott, "The mirative and evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- DeLancey, Scott, "Still mirative after all these years", Linguistic Typology, 16(3), pp.529~564 (2012)
- Dickinson, Connie, "Mirativity in Tsafiki", Studies in Language, 24(2), pp.379~422 (2000)
- Donabédian, Anaīd, "Towards a semasiological account of evidentials: An enunciative approach of -er in Modern Western Armenian", Journal of pragmatics, 33(3), pp.421~442 (2001)
- Friedman, Victor A, "Perhaps mirativity is phlogiston, but admirativity is perfect: On Balkan evidential strategies", Linguistic Typology, 16(3), pp.505~528 (2012)
- Hanks, William F., "L'énonciation médiatisée II: Le traitement épistémologique de l'information : illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes", pp.311~334 (2007), Peeters Publishers
- Hengeveld, Kees, "Didn't you know? Mirativity does exist!", Linguistic Typology, 16(3), pp.487~504 (2012)
- Hill, Nathan W, "Mirativity’ does not exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects", Linguistic Typology, 16(3), pp.389~434 (2012)
- Lazard, Gilbert, "Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?", Linguistic Typology, 3, pp.91~109 (1999)
- Lee, Hyo Sang, "Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.135~168 (1993)
- Plungian, Vladimir A., "Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages", pp.15~58 (2010), De Gruyter Mouton
- Radden, Günter, "Cognitive English Grammar" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing
- Slobin, Dan, "Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics", pp.185~200 (1982), Benjamins
- Strauss, Susan, "Cognitive realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence-ending particles -kwun, -ney and -tela", Language Sciences, 27, pp.437~480 (2005)