사적 술어의 인칭 제약에 대한 화용론적 연구
A Pragmatic Account of the Person Constraint of Private Predicates.
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Noh, Eun-Ju. 2017. A Pragmatic Account of the Person Constraint of Private Predicates. Journal of Korean Linguistics 43-1. 21-42. It has been claimed that Korean private predicates have to be used with a first person subject in statements. The person constraint has been analyzed as a syntactic or morpho-syntactic phenomenon. In this paper, within the framework of relevance theory, I suggest that the sentences with a private predicate be divided into representations (or descriptions) and metarepresentations. If the sentence ends with a declarative sentence-type suffix, it is the speaker's description of a state of affairs, which is constrained by the person constraint. If the sentence is used with an epistemic (including evidential) marker, it is a metarepresentation of the speaker’s own private representation, where the person constraint is lifted. In the case of an attributive metarepresentation, such as reported speech, the person constraint is imposed on the original representation. Thus, non-first-person subject can be used if it was a first person in the original representation. In Korean, these attributive metarepresentations have to be used with an explicit marker (like a verb of saying or a hearsay particle). Finally, I conclude that since the imposition of a person constraint on private predicates is pragmatically determined, the constraint can better be explained as a pragmatic phenomenon. (Inha University)
Abstract
Noh, Eun-Ju. 2017. A Pragmatic Account of the Person Constraint of Private Predicates. Journal of Korean Linguistics 43-1. 21-42. It has been claimed that Korean private predicates have to be used with a first person subject in statements. The person constraint has been analyzed as a syntactic or morpho-syntactic phenomenon. In this paper, within the framework of relevance theory, I suggest that the sentences with a private predicate be divided into representations (or descriptions) and metarepresentations. If the sentence ends with a declarative sentence-type suffix, it is the speaker's description of a state of affairs, which is constrained by the person constraint. If the sentence is used with an epistemic (including evidential) marker, it is a metarepresentation of the speaker’s own private representation, where the person constraint is lifted. In the case of an attributive metarepresentation, such as reported speech, the person constraint is imposed on the original representation. Thus, non-first-person subject can be used if it was a first person in the original representation. In Korean, these attributive metarepresentations have to be used with an explicit marker (like a verb of saying or a hearsay particle). Finally, I conclude that since the imposition of a person constraint on private predicates is pragmatically determined, the constraint can better be explained as a pragmatic phenomenon. (Inha University)
참고문헌 (22)
- 김흥수, "현대국어 심리동사 구문 연구" (1989), 탑 출판사
- 임은하, "감정동사 연구", 국어 교육, 68, pp.317~336 (1998)
- Kwon, Iksoo, "The Viewpoint Shifter ‘-eha-’ in Korean and How It Affects Causal Event Structure", Language Sciences, 42, pp.30~42 (2014)
- Lee, Chungmin, "Cases for Psychological Verbs in Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), pp.256~296 (1976)
- Lee, Hyo-Sang, "Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective", PhD, pp.1991
- Lee, Keedong, "A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles" (1983), Hankook
- Matsui, Tomoko, "Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude", pp.145~172 (2000), John Benjamins
- Noh, Eun-Ju, "Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(6), pp.603~628 (1998)
- Noh, Eun-Ju, "Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theory Approach" (2000), John Benjamins
- 노은주, "Linguistic Encoding of Relevance of the Propositional Content to the Addressee: A Korean Sentence-Final Particle e", 담화와 인지, 14(1), pp.41~62 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Palmer, F. R., "The English Verb" (1988), Longman
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean Language" (1999), University Press
- Sperber, Dan, "What is Intelligence?", pp.179~198 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Sperber, Dan, "Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective", Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, 10, pp.117~137 (2000)
- Sperber, Dan, "Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
- Uchida, Seiji, "Koji Hyoi kara Mita Nichieigo eno Ichishiten (Higher-level Explicatures in English and Japanese)", Bulletin for Human Culture, 17, pp.7~18 (2002), Nara Women’s University
- Uchida, Seiji, "Metarepresentation to Nihongo: ‘Tai", Tagatteiru’, 2004, pp.33(6), 79~86
- Metarepresentational Phenomena in Japanese and Korean, "Uchida, Seiji", Nara University, 46~
- Wilson, Deirdre, "Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication", Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, 10, pp.411~448 (2000)
- Wilson, Deirdre, "Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences", pp.77~101 (1988), Stanford University Press
- Yang, In-Seok, "Korean Syntax: Case Markers. Delimiters. Complementation, and Relativization. Doctoral Dissertation", PhD, pp.1972