A Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of -(u)m and -ki in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigated the properties of Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki using a distinctive collexeme analysis (DCA; Gries and Stefanowitch, 2004b). In this study, all the sentences with Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki were extracted from the Sejong Treebank. Then, a DCA was applied to the extracted corpus data. A DCA is known to be a statistical analysis which identifies the lexemes with a strong preference for one of the alternations. The analysis results demonstrated which predicates prefer -(u)m and which ones prefer -ki. Through the analysis, the followings were observed: (i) The collostructional strengths (CS) were differentiated in two dimensions (-(u)m vs. -ki and matrix predicate vs. complement predicate), (ii) -(u)m nominals have stronger CS values than -ki nominals, (iii) a lot of predicates can combine with -(u)m or -ki to form a nominal but that only some predicates -(u)m or -ki nominals as a complement, and (iv) Matrix predicates have stronger CS values than complement predicates.
Abstract
This paper investigated the properties of Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki using a distinctive collexeme analysis (DCA; Gries and Stefanowitch, 2004b). In this study, all the sentences with Korean nominalizer -(u)m and -ki were extracted from the Sejong Treebank. Then, a DCA was applied to the extracted corpus data. A DCA is known to be a statistical analysis which identifies the lexemes with a strong preference for one of the alternations. The analysis results demonstrated which predicates prefer -(u)m and which ones prefer -ki. Through the analysis, the followings were observed: (i) The collostructional strengths (CS) were differentiated in two dimensions (-(u)m vs. -ki and matrix predicate vs. complement predicate), (ii) -(u)m nominals have stronger CS values than -ki nominals, (iii) a lot of predicates can combine with -(u)m or -ki to form a nominal but that only some predicates -(u)m or -ki nominals as a complement, and (iv) Matrix predicates have stronger CS values than complement predicates.
참고문헌 (26)
- Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book" (1999), Heinle & Heinle Publishers
- Chae, W., "On the Korean Nominalizer -ki", Korean Linguistics, 8, pp.95~107 (1979)
- Chang, S., "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalization", Language Research, 2(1), pp.18~31 (1966)
- Choe, H., "Urimalbon" (1975), Jeongumsa
- Cowan, R., "The Teacher’s Grammar of English" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Deshors, C., "Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach", Journal of English Linguistics, 45(3), pp.260~290 (2017)
- Gries, S., "Language, Culture, and Mind", pp.225~236 (2004), Center for the Study of Language and Information
- Gries, S., "Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-based Perspective on ‘Alternations’", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), pp.97~129 (2004)
- Gries, S., "Coll.analysis 3.2a. A Program for R for Windows 2.x" (2007), University of California at Santa Babara
- Gries, S., "Converging Evidence : Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), pp.635~676 (2005)
- Hong, C., "Study on the Historical Change of the Nominalized Endings", Korean Language and Literature, 89, pp.31~51 (1983)
- Huddleston, R, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Im, H., "On the Semantic Characteristics of Nominalization", Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.83~104 (1974)
- Kim, J., "A Study on the Derivational Suffix -m and -ki", Study on the Korean Language Education, 2 (1973)
- Kim, M., "A Study on Word Formation of Suffix ‘-m’ and ‘-ki’", Doctoral, pp.2004
- Kim, N., "The Grammar of Korean Complementation" (1984), Center for Korean Studies. University of Hawaii
- Lee, Y., "A Multifactorial Analysis of Korean -m and -ki", A Paper Presented in the Conference of the Linguistic Association of Korea (2019)
- The Final Report of 21th Century Sejong Project, "National Institute of Korean Language", National Institute of Korean Language, ~ (2007)
- Pedersen, T., "Fishing for Exactness", Proceedings of the South-Central SAS Users Group Conference, pp.188~200 (1996)
- Quirk, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Sim, J., "Semantic Function of Nominalizer", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), pp.79~102 (1980)
- Stefanowitsch, A., "Covarying Collexemes", Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), pp.1~46 (2005)
- Stefanowitsch, A., "Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp.209~243 (2003)
- Suh, J., "Kuke Munpep" (1996), Hanyang University Press
- Woo, H., "Distributions and Semantic Function of Korean Nominalizer -(u)m and -ki", Language, 12, pp.119~160 (1987), Yonsei University
- Yang, D., "On Complementizers in Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 1(2), pp.18~46 (1976)